Skip to main content
Log in

Moral reasoning, parental sex attitudes, and sex guilt in female college students

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forty-eight female college students completed the Mosher Forced-Choice Guilt Inventory, the Rest Defining Issues Test, and the Family Attitude and Communication Scale in order to study the relationship between sex guilt, moral reasoning, and perceived parental sex attitudes. Analysis of variance indicated that Stage 4 moral reasoners had significantly higher sex guilt scores than Stage 5 reasoners. There was also a significant interaction effect between moral reasoning and perceived parental sex attitudes with respect to sex guilt, with Stage 5 reasoners from permissive family backgrounds having very low levels of guilt. The findings suggested that there is an overall negative relationship between sex guilt and moral reasoning, supporting prior studies. However, the relationship between sex guilt and permissive/restrictive family background is more complicated. Paradoxically, more advanced Stage 5 reasoners seemed more influenced by family sexual attitudes than Stage 4 reasoners. The authors offer an explanation for this finding and stress the importance of moral reasoning as a variable in understanding sexual attitudes and behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, P., Mosher, D., Abramson, L., and Woychowski, B. (1977). Personality correlates of the Mosher Guilt Scales.J. Person. Assess. 41: 375–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D., and Kelley K. (1981).An Introduction to Personality (3rd ed.). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. B. (1966). Two scales for parent evaluation.J. Genet. Psychol. 108: 49–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, R., and Baur, K. (1980).Our Sexuality. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Augelli, J. F., and Cross, H. J. (1975). Relationship of sex guilt and moral reasoning to premarital sex in college women and in couples.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 43: 40–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard, M., and Gibbons, F. X. (1982). Sexual experience, sex guilt, and sexual moral reasoning.J. Person. 50: 345–359.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, G., and Mosher, D. (1970). Effects of sex guilt and sexual stimulation on the recall of word associations.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 34: 67–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E., and Parke, R. (1979).Child Psychology: A Contemporary Viewpoint. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A. (1957).Two-Factor Index of Social Position. Yale University, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, K. (1979). Socialization factors in contraceptive attitudes: Roles of affective responses.J. Sex Res. 15: 6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, K. (1981). Adolescent sexuality: The first lessons. In Byrne, D., and Fisher, W. A. (eds.),Adolescents, Sex, and Contraception. New York: McGraw-Hill (as cited in Byrne and Kelley, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1963). The development of children's orientations toward a moral order: Sequence in the development of moral thought.Vita Humana, VI (as cited in Craig, R., 1972, An analysis of the psychology of moral development of L. Kohlberg.Counseling and Values 17: 10–17).

  • Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In Lickona, T. (ed.),Moral Development and Behavior. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langston, R. (1973). Sex guilt and sex behavior in college students.J. Person. Assess. 37: 467–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. (1961).The development and validation of a sentence completion measure of guilt. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.

  • Mosher, D., (1966). The development and multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis of three measures of three aspects of guilt.J. Consult. Psychol. 30: 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D., and Cross, H. J. (1971). Sex guilt and premarital sexual experiences of college students.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 36: 27–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Grady, K. E., and Janda, L. H. (1979). Factor analysis of the Mosher Forced-Choice Guilt Inventory.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 47: 1131–1133.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1932).The Moral Judgment of the Child. Harcourt, Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. (1976). New approaches in the assessment of moral judgment. In Lickona, T. (ed.),Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research and Social issues. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. (1979).Development in Judging Moral Issues. University of Minneapolis Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. (1979).Revised Manual for the Defining Issues Test: An Objective Test of Moral Judgment Development. Minneapolis: Minnesota Moral Research Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. (1973). Effects of sex guilt and sexual arousal on the retention of birth control information.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 41: 61–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Propper, S., Brown, R.A. Moral reasoning, parental sex attitudes, and sex guilt in female college students. Arch Sex Behav 15, 331–340 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01550367

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01550367

Key words

Navigation