Skip to main content
Log in

You and me as she and he: The meaning of gender-related concepts in other- and self-perception

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compares and contrasts the use of gender-related concepts in other-and self-perception. The schematic use and stereotypic and affective meanings of feminine and masculine were derived from hierarchical classes analysis (HICLAS) of participants' (N = 72; 50 females, 22 males, 54% white) ratings of self and significant others. The study reveals that people use these concepts differently in their perception of others than in their perception of self. In addition, the meaning of masculine and feminine constructed by these participants differs significantly from their traditional definitions. Finally, being feminine is evaluated more positively than being masculine in the perception of others, while the ego protective function of gender leads participants to evaluate their own gender's features most positively in self-perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashmore, R. D., Del Boca, F. K., & Titus, D. (1984).Types of women and men: Yours, mine and ours. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, Toronto, August.

  • Ashmore, R. D., Del Boca, F. K., & Wohlers, A. J. (1986). Gender stereotypes. In R. D. Ashmore & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.),The social psychology of female-male relations: A critical analysis of central concepts. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, R. D., & Ogilvie, D. M. (1988).Gender identity, sex stereotypes, and social action. Research proposal funded by the National Institute of Mental Health. Ashmore, R. D. & Ogilvie, D. (1992) He's such a nice boy ⋯ When he's with Grandma: Gender and evaluation in self-with-other representations. In R. P. Lipka & T. M. Brinhaupt (Eds.),The self: Definitional and methodological issues. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, D. (1966).The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D. J. (1972). Self perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 6). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1985). Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.),Psychology and gender. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 3). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I., Broverman, D., Clarkson, F., Rosenkrantz, P., & Vogel, S. (1970). Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgements of mental health.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum?Psychological Bulletin, 80 389–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, E. P. (1985). Psychological androgyny. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender.American Psychologist, 39 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boeck, P., & Rosenberg, S. (1988). Hierarchical classes: Model and data analysis.Psychometrica, 53 361–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lisi, R., & Soundranayagam, L. (1990). The conceptual structure of sex role stereotypes in college students.Sex Roles, 23 593–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1991). Are women evaluated more favorably than men? An analysis of attitudes, beliefs, and emotions.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, S. (1974). Approval of cross-sex-role behavior.Psychological Reports, 35 643–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. (1991).The saturated self. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982).In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hort, B. E., Fagot, B. I., & Leinbach, M. D. (1990). Are people's notion of maleness more stereotypically framed than their notion of femaleness?"Sex Roles, 23 197–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, S. J., & McKenna, W. (1978).Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1987). The varied meanings of"masculine" and “feminine.” In J. M. Reinisch, L. A. Rosenblum, & S. A. Sanders (Eds.),Masculinity/femininity: Basic perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawski, J. G. (1985). The measurement of masculinity and femininity: Engendering categorical realities. In A. J. Stewart & M. B. Lykes (Eds.),Gender and personality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Oyserman, D. (1989). Gender and thought: The role of the self-concept. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.),Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie, D. M., & Ashmore, R. D. (1991). Self-with other representations as a unit of analysis in self-concept research. In R. C. Curtis (Ed.),The relational self: Theoretical convergences in psychoanalysis and social psychology. New York: Guilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957).The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of outgroup homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of ingroup and outgroup members.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 1051–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955).Family, socialization and interaction processes. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, D. A. (1990). Familiarity and differences in self- and other-representations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59 369–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, S. (1988). Self and others: Studies in social personality and autobiography. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 21). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I., & Broverman, D. M. (1968). Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1967).The phenomenology of the social world. (G. Walsh & F. Lehnert, Trans.). Evanston, Il: Northwestern University Press. (Original work published in 1932).

    Google Scholar 

  • Six, B., & Eckes, T. (1991). A closer look at the complex structure of gender stereotypes.Sex Roles, 24 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.),Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1985). Gender identity and its implications for the concepts of masculinity and femininity. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.),Psychology and gender. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 32). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic acting out behaviors.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 1673–1682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity.JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology.

  • Van Mechelen, I., & De Boeck, P. (1990). Projection of a binary criterion into a model of hierarchical classes.Psychometrika, 55 677–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1982).Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty nation study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990).Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pennell, G.E., Ogilvie, D.M. You and me as she and he: The meaning of gender-related concepts in other- and self-perception. Sex Roles 33, 29–57 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01547934

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01547934

Keywords

Navigation