Abstract
A study of the cytology of endosperm ofPisum sativum, pea, fixed at different stages of development reveals that it remains free nuclear throughout its entire life. The nuclei are extremely polymorphic and differ in size from each other. The nuclei increase proportionately in size with the advancement in endosperm age.
The haploid chromosome number of the taxon was verified asn=7. The endosperm nuclei were normally triploid with 3n=21 chromosomes, but higher polyploidy (6n and 12n) and aneuploidy were also recorded in small proportions. Nuclear fusions and aberrations such as irregular separation of chromosomes, sticky bridges and laggards are believed to be responsible for the origin of polyploid nuclei.
Accumulation of mitotic aberrations including bridges and laggards are considered to result in reduced divisional activity thereby leading to endosperm breakdown with the consequent low seed set in some cases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham, A. &P. M. Mathew (1963). Cytology of coconut endosperm.Ann. Bot., N. S. 27: 505–512.
Abraham, A., C. A. Ninan &P. Gopinath (1965). Cytology of development of abnormal endosperm in Phillipine Makapuno coconuts.Caryologia 18: 395–408.
Brink, R. A. &D. C. Cooper (1947). The endosperm in seed development.Bot. Rev. 13: 423–541.
Cooper, G. O. (1938). Cytological investigations ofPisum sativum.Bot. Gaz. 99: 584–591.
Duncan, R. E. &J. G. Ross (1950). The nucleus in differentiation and development. III. Nuclei of maize endosperm.Jour. Hered. 41: 259–268.
Enzenberg, U. (1961). Beiträge zur Karyologie des Endosperms.Österr. Bot. Z. 102: 460–475.
Geitler, L. (1953). Endomitose und endomitotische Polyploidisierung.Protoplasmatologia 6: 1–89.
Kapoor, B. M. (1966a). Contributions to the cytology of endosperm in some Angiosperms. X.Nigella damascena andN. sativa.Caryologia 19: 73–83.
Kapoor, B. M. (1966b). Contributions to the cytology of endosperm in Angiosperms. XI.Lathyrus odoratus L.Genet. Iberica (in press).
Kapoor, B. M. &S. L. Tandon (1963a). Contributions to the cytology of endosperm in some Angiosperms. III.Amaryllis belladonna L.Cytologia 28: 399–408.
Kapoor, B. M. &S. L. Tandon (1963b). Contributions to the cytology of endosperm in some Angiosperms. IV.Zephyranthes grandiflora Lindl.Genetica 34: 102–112.
Kapoor, B. M. &S. L. Tandon (1964a). Contributions to the cytology of endosperm in some Angiosperms. V.Zephyranthes lancasteri Traub.Φyton 21: 37–43.
Kapoor, B. M. &S. L. Tandon (1964c). Contributions to the cytology of endosperm in some Angiosperms. VI.Allium cepa L.Portug. Acta Biol. 8: 115–124.
Kapoor, B. M. &S. L. Tandon (1964c). Contributions to the cytology of endosperm in some Angiosperms. VII.Vicia faba L.Caryologia 17: 471–479.
Kapoor, B. M. &S. L. Tandon (1964d). Contributions to the cytology of endosperm in some Angiosperms. VIII.Chrysanthemum carinatum L.Genetica 35: 197–204.
Kapoor, B. M. &S. L. Tandon (1964e). Contributions to the cytology of endosperm in some Angiosperms. IX.Solanum melongena L.The Nucleus 7: 37–41.
Kato, Y. (1957). Cytological abnormalities in the embryo-sac mother cell and endosperm tissue ofLilium Formolongo Hort. andAllium fistulosum L.Cytologia 22: 69–79.
Punnett, H. H. (1953). Cytological evidence of hexaploid cells in maize endosperm.Jour. Hered. 44: 257–259.
Roy, R. P. &R. P. Jha (1960). Cytology of endosperm in some Dipterocarps and legumes.Proc. 47th Indian Sci. Congr. (Bombay), Part III: 364–365.
Tandon, S. L. &B. M. Kapoor (1962a). Cytology of endosperm in Angiosperms.Sci. & Cult. 28: 114–117.
Tandon, S. L. &B. M. Kapoor (1962b). Contributions to the cytology of endosperm in some Angiosperms. I.Zephyranthes ajax Sprenger.Caryologia 15: 21–41.
Tandon, S. L. &B. M. Kapoor (1963). Contributions to the cytology of endosperm in some Angiosperms. II.Nothoscordum fragrans Kunth.Caryologia 16: 377–395.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kapoor, B.M. Contributions to the cytology of endosperm in angiosperms-XII.Pisum sativum L.. Genetica 37, 557–568 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01547153
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01547153