Conclusions
-
1.
The energy-storage hydroelectric stations proposed by P. P. Khlopenkov can be regarded as an alternative to channel stations under favorable (for an ESHES) natural conditions and in the case of economic and ecological counterindications of the creation of large channel reservoirs.
-
2.
As the technical economic studies showed, reconstruction of the Volga-Lenin HES to the Samara ESHES with lowering the design level of the Kuibyshev reservoir both by 10 m and 4 m is not expedient.
-
3.
The creation of the upper reservoir of the ESHES in the Zhiguli Mountains under extremely difficult natural conditions is related to major complicated engineering works.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
V. D. Novozhenin and G. L. Sarukhanov, “Energy-storage hydroelectric station on Samarskaya Luka,” Énerg. Stroit., No. 1 (1990).
G. L. Sarukhanov and V. D. Novozhenin, “Concerning lowering the water level in the Kuibyshev reservoir,” Proekt. Inzh. Izysk., No. 4 (1990).
V. D. Novozhenin and G. L. Sarukhanov, “Concerning the matter of lowering the water levels in Volga reservoirs,” Gidrotekh. Stroit., No. 8 (1991).
Additional information
Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel'stvo, No. 1, pp. 43–45, January, 1993.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sarukhanov, G.L. Once more concerning the matter of energy-storage hydroelectric stations. Hydrotechnical Construction 27, 46–48 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01545557
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01545557