Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate interpersonal sexist discrimination, operationally defined as distancing behavior. A heterogeneous sample of participants were approached at four train stations and completed two paper and pencil simulated seating measures, a sex role attitudes measure, and provided demographic information. It was predicted that in the neutral situations presented in the seating measures where there is a choice to sit either next to a man or a woman, men would more often choose to sit next to a man but women were not expected to make seating choices based on the gender of the person seated. Men's seating choices were found to be influenced by the gender of target persons whereas women's choices were not, but men either distanced from or approached women target persons. Self-reported sex role attitudes were found not to be related to distancing behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females' friendliness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830–838.
Abbey, A., & Melby, C. (1986). The effects of nonverbal cues on gender differences in perceptions of sexual intent.Sex Roles, 15, 283–298.
Johnson, C. B., Stockdale, M. S., & Saal, F. E. (1991). Persistence of men's misperceptions of friendly cues across a variety of interpersonal encounters.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 463–475.
Kasof, J. (1993). Sex bias in the naming of stimulus persons.Psychological Bulletin, 113, 140–163.
Larsen, K. S., & Long, E. (1988). Attitudes toward sex-roles: Traditional or egalitarian?Sex Roles, 19, 1–12.
Lott, B. (1987). Sexist discrimination as distancing behavior: I. A laboratory demonstration.Psychology of Women Quartely, 11, 47–58.
Lott, B. (1989). Sexist discrimination as distancing behavior: II. Primetime television.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 341–355.
Lott, B. (1995). Interpersonal sexist discrimination as distancing behavior. In. B. Lott & D. Maluso (Eds.)The Social Psychology of Interpersonal Discrimination. New York: Guilford.
Lott, B., Lott, A. J., & Fernald, J. (1990). Individual differences in distancing responses to women on a photo choice task.Sex Roles, 22, 97–110.
Maluso, D. (1989).Intergender Distancing Behavior: A Field Experiment. Master's thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881.
Saal, F. E., Johnson, C. B., & Weber, N. (1989). Friendly or sexy? It may depend on whom you ask.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 263–276.
Additional information
Requests for reprints may be sent to any of the authors at the University of Rhode Island, Department of Psychology, Kingston, RI 02881.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saris, R.N., Johnston, I. & Lott, B. Women as cues for men's approach or distancing behavior: A study of interpersonal sexist discrimination. Sex Roles 33, 289–298 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544616
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544616