Skip to main content
Log in

Revisiting university student gender role perceptions

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gender role perceptions of five objects—Ideal Woman, Ideal Man, Most Women, Most Men and Self—were elicited from 3300 university students, 81% of whom were Caucasian, with 7% Hispanic, 6% African-American, and 4% Asian. Profiles of student responses for the five objects provided a comprehensive updating of 1970s research on student gender roles. Women (N= 1842) and men (N= 1148) students generally preferred an androgynous Ideal Woman. Women also preferred an androgynous Ideal Man, but men preferred a masculine sex-typed Ideal Man. Women and men's perceptions of Most Women and Men continued to be sex-typed. Men's self perceptions were androgynous, while women saw themselves as feminine sex-typed. Findings suggest that little change in students' gender role perceptions has occurred in the past 15 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, K., & Landers, A. (1978). Sex differences in dominance behavior.Sex Roles, 4, 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. (1992).Gender stereotypes and roles. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. (1981).Bem Sex Role Inventory: Professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, D., & Williams, J. (1991). Sex stereotypes in the United States revisited: 1972–1988.Sex Roles, 24, 413–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabeck, M., & Weisgerber, K. (1989). College students' perceptions of men and women choosing teaching and management: The effects of gender and sex role egalitarianism.Sex Roles, 21, 841–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I., Vogel, S., Broverman, D., Clarkson, F., & Rosenkrantz, P. (1972). Sex role stereotypes: A current appraisal.Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer.Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, E. (1985).Psychological androgyny. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deseran, F., & Falk, W. (1982). Women as generalized other and self theory.Sex Roles, 8, 283–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagley, A., & Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes towards women and men.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etaugh, C., & Spiller, B. (1989). Attitudes towards women: Comparison of traditional-aged and older college students.Journal of College Student Development, 30, 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etaugh, C., & Stern, J. (1984). Person perceptions: Effects of employment status, marital status and age of child.Sex Roles, 11, 413–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, L., Deutsch, C., & Strahan, R. (1978). Feminine and masculine dimensions of the typical, desirable and ideal woman and man.Sex Roles, 4, 767–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, P., & Medalie, J. (1989). The college scene today: Two views.Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 3, 89–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, F., & Carlisle, W. (1990). Gender diversity in student affairs: Administrative perceptions and recommendations.NASPA Journal, 27, 306–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A., & Andre, T. (1992). College students' attitudes toward women: A three dimensional approach.College Student Journal, 26, 253–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D., & Eisenhart, M. (1988). Moments of discontent: University women and the gender status quo.Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 19, 115–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudak, M. (1993). Gender schema theory revisited: Men's stereotypes of American women.Sex Roles, 28, 279–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. (1989). Feminization of student affairs.NASPA Journal, 27, 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalof, L., & Cargill, T. (1991). Fraternity and sorority membership and gender dominance attitudes.Sex Roles, 25, 417–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarovsky, M. (1985).Women in college, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipps, H. (1933).Sex and gender. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B. (1979). Sex role orientation and fear of success: Clarifying an unclear relationship.Sex Roles, 5, 126–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P., & Hummer, R. (1989). Fraternities and rape on campus.Gender and Society, 3, 457–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, J., & Sherriffs, A. (1959). Men's and women's beliefs, ideals and self-concepts.American Journal of Sociology, 64, 356–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettles, E., & Loevinger, J. (1983). Sex role expectations and ego level in relation to problem marriages.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 676–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (1982).In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best-run companies. New York: Warner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pooler, W. (1991). Sex of child preference among college students.Sex Roles, 25, 569–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (1959). Therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships. In S. Koch (ed.),Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. III). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, B., & Labeff, E. (1977). Sex roles and feminism revisited: An intergenerational comparison.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 113–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scher, D. (1984). Sex-role contradictions: Self-perceptions and ideal perceptions.Sex Roles, 10, 651–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvern, L., & Ryan, V. (1983). A reexamination of masculine and feminine sex-role ideals and conflicts among ideals for the man, woman, and person.Sex Roles, 9, 1223–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624–635.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stickel, S., & Bonett, R. (1991). Gender differences in career self efficacy: Combining a career with home and family.Journal of College Student Development, 32, 297–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, S. (1985). Education and business students: A comparison of self and sex role attitudes.College Student Journal, 19, 86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, S., & Meek, P. (1980). Greek and non-Greek student perceptions of sex roles.Journal of the National Association for Women Deans, Administrators, and Counselors, 43, 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., & Hall, J. (1982). Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions.Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, R., & Crawford, M. (1992).Women and gender: A feminist psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. (1980). Concepts of self, ideal self and ideal woman held by college men and women: A comparison study.Journal of College Personnel, 21, 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werrbach, J., & Gilbert, L. (1987). Men, gender stereotyping, and psychotherapy: Therapists' perceptions of male clients.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 562–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. (1983). Sex role orientation and self esteem: A critical meta-analytic review.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 756–778.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Street, S., Kimmel, E.B. & Kromrey, J.D. Revisiting university student gender role perceptions. Sex Roles 33, 183–201 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544610

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544610

Keywords

Navigation