Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 31, Issue 5–6, pp 275–295 | Cite as

Who's on top? Power in romantic relationships

  • Diane H. Felmlee
Article

Abstract

Power balances are investigated in a sample of 413 heterosexual dating individuals (86% white, 9.7% black, 4.3% other ethnicities). Less than half the respondents perceive their relationships to be equal in the distribution of power, and men are over twice as likely as women to be viewed as the partners having more power. Imbalances are also evident in three related measures—decision-making, emotional involvement, and equity. A higher proportion of both women and men say that the male partner, rather than the female partner, made more of the decisions, was less emotionally involved, and in general was “getting a better deal.” Finally, male dominance, but not equality of power between the genders, is associated with greater romantic relationship longevity. More specifically, the higher the relative degree of power attributed by respondents to the male, rather than the female, partner of a dyad, the lower is the subsequent rate of relationship dissolution.

Keywords

Social Psychology Male Partner Romantic Relationship Good Deal Related Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allison, P. (1984).Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bernard, J. (1972).The future of marriage. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
  3. Blau, P. M. (1964).Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960).Husbands and wives. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Caldwell, M. A., & Peplau, L. A. (1984). The balance of power in lesbian relationships.Sex Roles, 10 587–599.Google Scholar
  6. Cancian, F. C. (1987).Love in America: Gender and self-development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cate, R. M., & Lloyd, S. A. (1992).Courtship. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Cate, R. M., Lloyd, S. A., & Henton, J. M. (1986). The effect of equity, equality, and reward level on the stability of students' premarital relationships.Journal of Social Psychology, 125 715–721.Google Scholar
  9. Cromwell, R. E., & Olson, D. (Eds.). (1975).Power in families. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  10. Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 735–754.Google Scholar
  11. Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., & Bassin, E. (1990). The dissolution of intimate relationships: A hazard model.Social Psychology Quarterly, 53 13–30.Google Scholar
  12. Gerber, G. L. (1988). Leadership roles and the gender stereotype traits.Sex Roles, 18 649–668.Google Scholar
  13. Gillespie, D. L. (1971). Who has the power? The marital struggle.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33 445–458.Google Scholar
  14. Grauerholz, E. (1985).Power and intimacy: Power relationships between men and women. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  15. Grauerholz, E. (1987). Balancing the power in dating relationships.Sex Roles, 10 563–571.Google Scholar
  16. Gray-Little, B. (1982). Marital quality and power processes among black couples.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44 633–646.Google Scholar
  17. Gray-Little, B., & Burks, N. (1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique.Psychological Bulletin, 93 513–538.Google Scholar
  18. Hatfield, E., & Traupmann, J. (1981). Intimate relationships: A perspective from equity theory. In S. W. Duck & R. Gilmour (Eds.),Personal relationships 1: Studying personal relationships. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1976). Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs.Journal of Social Issues, 32 147–168.Google Scholar
  20. Horwitz, A. V. (1982). Sex-role expectations, power, and psychological distress.Sex Roles, 8 607–623.Google Scholar
  21. Hyde, J. S. (1990). Meta-analysis and the psychology of gender differences.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16 55–73.Google Scholar
  22. Lipman-Blumen, J. (1984).Gender roles and power. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Lips, H. M. (1991).Women, men, and power. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  24. Lujansky, H., & Mikula, G. (1983). Can equity theory explain the quality and stability of romantic relationships?British Journal of Social Psychology, 22 101–112.Google Scholar
  25. McDonald, G. W. (1980). Family power: The assessment of a decade of theory and research, 1970–1979.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42 841–854.Google Scholar
  26. National Opinion Research Center. (1985).General social surveys, 1972–1985: Cumulative data. Chicago: National Opinion research Center [producer].Google Scholar
  27. Peplau, L. A. (1979). Power in dating relationships. In J. Freeman (Ed.),Women: A feminist perspective (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  28. Rodman, H. (1972). Marital power and the theory of resources in cultural context.Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 3 50–69.Google Scholar
  29. Ruble, T. L. (1983). Sex stereotypes: Issues of change in the 1970's.Sex Roles, 9 397–402.Google Scholar
  30. Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1970). The study of family power structure: A review 1960–1969.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32 539–552.Google Scholar
  31. Scanzoni, J. (1982).Sexual bargaining: Power politics in the American marriage (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sprecher, S. (1985). Sex differences in bases of power in dating relationships.Sex Roles, 12 449–462.Google Scholar
  33. Sprecher, S. (1986). The relationship between inequity and emotions in close relationships.Social Psychology Quarterly, 49 309–321.Google Scholar
  34. Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1992). The influence of parents and friends on the quality and stability of romantic relationships: A three-wave longitudinal investigation.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54 1–13.Google Scholar
  35. Teachman, J. D. (1982). Methodological issues in the analysis of family formation and dissolution.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44 1037–1053.Google Scholar
  36. Tuma, N. B., Hannan, M. T., & Groeneveld, L. T. (1979). Dynamic analysis of event histories.American Journal of Sociology, 84 820–854.Google Scholar
  37. U.S. Department of Labor, Women's Bureau. (1990).Facts on working women, No. 90-2.Google Scholar
  38. Waller, W. (1937). The rating and dating complex.American Sociological Review, 2 727–734.Google Scholar
  39. Williams, J. E., & Bennett, S. M. (1975). The definition of sex stereotypes via the adjective check list.Sex Roles, 1 327–337.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane H. Felmlee
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations