Researchers have criticized existing measures of masculinity and femininity, largely on the basis of their unidimensional nature. The purpose of the present research was twofold: first, to determine the features most central to the categories of masculinity and femininity (prototypes), and second, to identify the dimensions of masculinity and femininity. Instead of relying upon a priori notions of the features that constitute masculinity and femininity, lay conceptions of masculinity and femininity were obtained from college students and their parents. Approximately half of the subjects who participated in this research were Caucasian. To distinguish gender role from gender, subjects were asked to describe one of six stimulus persons: masculine male, masculine female, masculine person, feminine male, feminine female, feminine person. Contrary to previous claims, subjects were able to articulate their conceptions of masculinity and femininity, physical features did not dominate their descriptions, and a number of personality traits named did correspond to conventional inventories. These features were rated by a second group of subjects in terms of how well they described the same set of six stimulus persons. Factor analyses revealed what could be described as lay conceptions of the dimensions of masculinity and femininity. The utility of these dimensions for future research is discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Antill, J. K. (1983). Sex role complementarity versus similarity in married couples.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 145–155.
Bakan, D. (1966).The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Batlis, N., & Small, A. (1982). Sex roles and Type A behavior.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(2), 315–316.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42 155–162.
Blascovich, J., Major, B., & Katkin, E. S. (1981).Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(4), 600–604.
Brannon, R. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture's blueprint of manhood, and what it's done for us lately. In D. David & R. Brannon (Eds.),The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Cantor, N., & Mischel, W. (1979). Prototypes in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12). New York: Academic Press.
Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity—femininity: An exception to a famous dictum?Psychological Bulletin, 80 389–407.
Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 991–1004.
Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior.Psychological Review, 94(3), 369–389.
Doyle, J. A. (1983).The male experience. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
Frank, S. J., McLaughlin, A. M., & Crusco, A. (1984). Sex role attributes, symptom distress, and defensive style among college men and women.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 182–192.
Garfinkel, P. (1985).In a man's world. Scarborough, Ontario: The New American Library.
Gough, H. G. (1952). Identifying psychological femininity.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 12 427–439.
Gross, A. E. (1978). The male role and heterosexual behavior.Journal of Social Issues, 34 87–107.
Guilford, J. P, & Guilford, R. B. (1936). Personality factors, S, E, and M and Their Measurement.Journal of Psychology, 2 109–127.
Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1940). A multiphasic personality schedule (Minnesota); Construction of a schedule.Journal of Psychology, 10 249–254.
Helgeson, V. S. (1990). The role of masculinity in a prognostic predictor of heart attack severity.Sex Roles, 22 755–774.
Helgeson, V. S., Shaver, P., & Dyer, M. (1987). Prototypes of intimacy and distance in same-sex and opposite-sex relationships.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4 195–233.
Holahan, C. K., & Spence, J. T. (1980). Desirable and undesirable masculine and feminine traits in counseling clients and unselected students.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48 300–302.
Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.),Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Kurdek, L. A., & Schmitt, J. P. (1986). Relationship quality of partners in heterosexual married, heterosexual cohabitating, and gay and lesbian relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 711–720.
Lau, C. (1989). Sex role orientation and domains of self-esteem.Sex Roles, 21 415–422.
Lewin, M. (1984a). Rather worse than folly? Psychology measures femininity and masculinity, 1. In M. Lewin (Ed.),In the shadow of the past: Psychology portrays the sexes. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lewin, M. (1984b). Psychology measures femininity and masculinity, 2. In M. Lewin (Ed.),In the shadow of the past: Psychology portrays the sexes. New York: Columbia University Press.
Locksley, A., & Colten, M. E. (1979). Psychological androgyny: A case of mistaken identity?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 1017–1031.
Lundy, A., & Rosenberg, J. A. (1987). Androgyny, masculinity, and self-esteem.Social Behavior and Personality, 15(1), 91–95.
Murstein, B. I., & Williams, P. D. (1983). Sex roles and marriage adjustment.Small Group Behavior, 14(1), 77–94.
Myers, A. M., & Gonda, G. (1982). Utility of the masculinity-femininity construct: Comparison of traditional and androgyny approaches.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43 514–523.
Nezu, A. M., & Nezu, C. M. (1987). Psychological distress, problem-solving, and coping reactions: Sex role differences.Sex Roles, 16 205–214.
Nichols, J. (1975).Men's liberation: A new definition of masculinity. New York: Penguin Books, Ltd.
O'Heron, C. A., & Orlofsky, J. L. (1990). Stereotypic and nonstereotypic sex role trait and behavior orientations, gender identity, and psychological adjustment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58 134–143.
O'Neil, J. M., Helms, B. J., Gable, R. K., David, L., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1986). Gender-role conflict scale: College men's fear of femininity.Sex Roles, 14 335–350.
Peterson, C. D., Baucom, D. H., Elliott, M. J., & Farr, P. A. (1989). The relationship between sex role identity and marital adjustment.Sex Roles, 21 775–787.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.),Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O'Connor, D. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 1061–1086.
Snell, W. E., Jr. (1986). The Masculine Role Inventory: Components and correlates.Sex Roles, 15 443–455.
Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 656–666.
Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.),Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationship to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 1673–1682.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity.JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4 127.
Spence, J. T., & Sawin, L. L. (1985). Images of masculinity and femininity: A reconceptualization. In. V. E. O'Leary, R. K. Unger, & B. S. Wallston (Eds.),Sex, gender and social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Strong, E. K. (1936). Interests of men and women.Journal of Social Psychology, 7 49–67.
Tavris, C., & Wade, C. (1984).The longest war: Sex differences in perspective. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Terman, L., & Miles, C. C. (1936).Sex and personality, studies in masculinity and femininity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tolson, A. (1977).The limits of masculinity. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
Verbrugge, L. M. (1985). Gender and health: An update on hypotheses and evidence.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 26 156–182.
Wheeler, L., Reis, H., & Nezlek, J. (1983). Loneliness, social interaction, and sex roles.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 943–953.
Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1983). Sex role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 765–778.
Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1984). Sex-role orientation and psychological well-being: Two meta-analyses.Sex Roles, 12 207–225.
The author is grateful to Phillip Shaver, Michael Scheier, and the anonymous reviewers for comments on a previous draft of the manuscript.
About this article
Cite this article
Helgeson, V.S. Prototypes and dimensions of masculinity and femininity. Sex Roles 31, 653–682 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544286
- College Student
- Social Psychology
- Physical Feature
- Personality Trait
- Gender Role