Skip to main content
Log in

Gender-related personality traits and ego development: Differential patterns for men and women

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two studies were designed to test the hypothesis that enhanced ego level affords the capacity to express those gender-related traits stereotypical for the opposite sex. In Study 1, 209 white male and female college students completed the Personal Attributes Questionnaire and the Loevinger Sentence Completion Test, a semiprojective measure of ego development. Analyses revealed that for women, instrumentality was related to ego development; for men, expressiveness was associated with ego level. Study 2 further tested this hypothesis using a more heterogeneous sample and several alternative measures of gender-related traits, including the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Nontraditional gender role traits and ideals (masculinity for females, femininity for males) were associated with higher levels of ego development. Implications of the findings for ego development theory are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antill, J., & Cunningham, J. (1979). Self-esteem as a function of masculinity in both sexes.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 783–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, D. (1966).The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. (1975). Sex-role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. (1981a). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing.Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. (1981b).Bem Sex-Role Inventory professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S., & Lenney, E. (1976). Sex typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 48–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S., Martyna, W., & Watson, C. (1976). Sex typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1016–1023.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berzins, J., Welling, M., & Wetter, R. (1978). A new measure of psychological androgyny based on the Personality Research Form.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 126–138.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. H. (1973). Conceptions of sex-role: Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives.American Psychologist, 28, 512–526.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bursik, K. (1991). Adaptation to divorce and ego development in adult women.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 300–306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costos, D. (1986). Sex role identity in young adults: Its parental antecedents and relation to ego development.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 602–611.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. (1980). Loevinger's measure of ego development: Reliability and national norms for male and female short forms.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 909–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. (1964). Acquisition and significance of sex typing and sex role identity. In M. Hoffman & L. Hoffman (Eds.),Review of child development research. New York: Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive-development analysis of children's sex-role concepts and attitudes. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.),The development of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1976).Ego development: Conceptions and theories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1979). Construct validity of the Sentence Completion Test of Ego Development.Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 281–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J., & Hy Le, L. (1989).Measuring ego development: Supplementary manual and exercises for Form 81 of the Washington University Sentence Completion Test. Unpublished manuscript, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J., & Wessler, R. (1970).Measuring ego development: Vol. 1. Construction and use of a sentence completion test. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J., Wessler, R., & Redmore, C. (1970).Measuring ego development: Vol. 2. Scoring manual for women and girls. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorr, M., & Manning, T. (1978). Personality correlates of the sex role types.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34, 884–888.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A., & Butcher, J. (1981). The relationship between androgyny and subjective indicators of emotional well-being.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 722–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A., & Butcher, J. (1983). Masculinity, femininity, and androgyny viewed and assessed as distinct concepts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 722–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. (1987). Masculinity, femininity, and androgyny: Their relations to multiple dimension of self-concept.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 22, 91–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H., & Byrne, B. (1991). Differentiated additive androgyny model: Relations between masculinity, femininity, and multiple dimensions of self-concept.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 811–828.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nettles, E., & Loevinger, J. (1983). Sex role expectations and ego level in relation to problem marriages.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 676–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Heron, C., & Orlofsky, J. (1990). Stereotypic and nonstereotypic sex role trait and behavior orientations, gender identity, and psychological adjustment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 134–143.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Neil, J. (1990). Assessing men's gender role conflict. In D. Moore & F. Leafgren (Eds.),Men in conflict: Problem solving strategies and interventions (pp. 23–38). Alexandria, VA: American Association for Counseling and Development Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E., & Tetenbaum, J. (1979). Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prager, K., & Bailey, J. (1985). Androgyny, ego development, and psychosocial crisis resolution.Sex Roles, 13, 525–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmore, C., & Waldman, K. (1975). Reliability of a sentence completion measure of ego development.Journal of Personality Assessment, 39, 236–243.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, E., & Koopman, E. (1978). the relationship of women's sex role identity to self-esteem and ego development.Journal of Psychology, 98, 299–305.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, K., & Robins, C. (1987). Psychological androgyny and ego development.Sex Roles, 16, 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a Multifactorial Theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624–635.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity.Journal Supplement Abstract Service Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., & Hall, J. (1982). Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions.Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, M. (1981). Reliability of the Sentence Completion Test of ego development in a clinical population.Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 485–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. (1983). Sex role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 765–778.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bursik, K. Gender-related personality traits and ego development: Differential patterns for men and women. Sex Roles 32, 601–615 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544214

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544214

Keywords

Navigation