Abstract
This study investigated antecedents and work-related correlates of reported sexual harassment by 365 primarily Caucasian women in male-typed, female-typed, and gender-integrated occupations. Two competing hypotheses on the antecedents of sexual harassment were tested. No support was found for the “contact hypothesis,” which holds that harassment is related to contact with the opposite gender. Partial support was found for the “sex role spillover” model, which holds that harassment is due to the transfer of gender roles to the workplace. No significant differences in reports of sexual harassment were found between women in male-typed, female-typed, and gender-integrated occupations. Within male-typed occupations, blue-collar women reported greater harassment than white-collar women, but were less likely to display assertive reactions to harassment. Investigation of work-related outcomes revealed that sexual harassment was positively related to reports of gender discrimination in promotion and employment practices, and had a negative impact on job satisfaction, particularly among blue-collar women. Theoretical implications of these results are discussed and a revision of the sex role spillover model is presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, D. D., Terpstra, D. E., & Larntz, K. (1990). The influence of individual characteristics and severity of harassing behavior on reactions to sexual harassment.Sex Roles, 22, 305–325.
Beggs, J. M., & Doolittle, D. C. (1993). Perceptions now and then of occupational sex typing: A replication of Shinar's 1975 study.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1435–1453.
Betz, N. E., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1987).The career psychology of women. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Bielby, W. T., & Baron, J. N. (1984). A woman's place is with other women: Sex segregation within organizations. In B. F. Reskin (Ed.),Sex segregation in the workplace. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brass, D. J. (1985). Men's and women's networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization.Academy of Management Journal, 28, 327–343.
Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal.Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59–78.
Brooks, L., & Perot, A. R. (1991). Reporting sexual harassment: Exploring a predictive model.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 31–47.
Bureau of National Affairs. (1987, June). Sexual harassment: Employer policies and problems.Personnel Policies Forum. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.
Colwill, N. L., & Colwill, H. D. (1986). Women with blue collars: The forgotten minority.Business Quarterly, 50, 15–17.
Cornell University. (1975). Study conducted in 1975 by the Working Women's Institute. In L. Farley (Ed.),Sexual shakedown: the sexual harassment of women on the job. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Corriher, S. E., & Booth, R. (1994).Sexual harassment and job satisfaction: The climate for women in an institution for higher-learning. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC.
Craig, J. M., & Jacobs, R. R. (1985). The effect of working with women on male attitudes toward female firefighters.Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 6, 61–74.
Crull, P. (1982). Stress effects of sexual harassment on the job: Implications for counseling.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 539–544.
Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S. L., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, Y., Ormerod, M., & Weitzman, L. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152–175.
Frierson, J. G. (1989). Reduce the costs of sexual harassment.Personnel Journal, 68, 79–85.
Garvey, M. S. (1986). The high cost of sexual harassment suits.Personnel Journal, 65, 75–78, 80.
Greenfeld, S., Greiner, L., & Wood, M. M. (1980). The “feminine mystique” in male-dominated jobs: A comparison of attitudes and background factors of women in male-dominated versus female-dominated jobs.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 17, 291–309.
Gutek, B. A. (1985).Sex and the workplace: The impact of sexual behavior and harassment on women, men, and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gutek, B. A., & Cohen, A. G. (1987). Sex ratios, sex role spillover, and sex at work: A comparison of men's and women's experiences.Human Relations, 40, 97–115.
Gutek, B. A., & Dunwoody, V. (1987). Understanding sex in the workplace. In A. Stromberg, L. Larwood & B. A. Gutek (Eds.),Women and work: An annual review (Vol. 2). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gutek, B. A., & Morasch, B. (1982). Sex-ratios, sex-role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work.Journal of Social Issues, 38, 55–74.
Gutek, B. A., Cohen, A. G., & Konrad, A. M. (1990). Predicting social-sexual behavior at work: A contact hypothesis.Academy of Management Journal, 33, 560–577.
Hawkins, R. P., & Pingree, S. (1978). Effects of changing proportions of the sexes on ratings of occupational prestige.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2, 314–322.
Kanter, R. M. (1977).Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Konrad, A. M., & Gutek, B. A. (1986). Impact of work experiences on attitudes toward sexual harassment.Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 422–438.
Linenberger, P., & Keaveny, T. J. (1981). Sexual harassment in employment.Human Resource Management, 20, 11–17.
Livingston, J. A. (1982). Responses to sexual harassment on the job: Legal, organizational, and individual actions.Journal of Social Issues, 38, 5–22.
Mansfield, P. K., Koch, P. B., Henderson, J., Vicary, J. R., Cohn, M., & Young, E. (1991). The job climate for women in traditionally male blue-collar environments.Sex Roles, 25, 63–79.
Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Mechelle Vinson, 447 U.S. 57, 40 FEP cases 1822 (June 19, 1986).
Meyer, H., & Lee, M. (1978).Women in traditionally male jobs: The experiences of ten public utility companies, R & D Monograph No. 65, U.S. Department of Labor Report, ETA, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. (1981).Women and work: A psychological perspective. New York: Praeger.
O'Farrell, B. (1982). Women and nontraditional blue-collar jobs in the 1980's: An overview. In P. A. Wallace (Ed.),Women in the workplace. Boston: Auburn House.
O'Farrell, B. (1983. Women in blue-collar occupations: Traditional and nontraditional. In A. H. Stromberg & S. Harkess (Eds.),Working women: Theories and facts in perspective. Mountain View CA: Mayfield.
O'Farrell, B., & Harlan, S. L. (1982). Craftworkers and clerks: The effect of male co-worker hostility on women's satisfaction with non-traditional jobs.Social Problems, 29, 252–265.
Powell, B., & Jacobs, J. A. (1983). Sex and consensus in occupational prestige ratings.Sociology and Social Research, 67, 392–404.
Ragins, B. R., & Sundstrom, E. (1989). Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective.Psychological Bulletin, 105, 51–88.
Safran, C. (1976, November). What men do to women on the job: A shocking look at sexual harassment,Redbook, pp. 149, 217–223.
Sandroff, R. (1988, December). Sexual harassment in the Fortune 500.Working Woman, pp. 69–73.
Scheffield, C. J. (1987). Sexual terrorism: The social control of women. In B. B. Hess & M. M. Ferree (Eds.),Analyzing gender: A handbook of social science research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Shinar, E. H. (1975). Sexual stereotypes of occupations.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 7, 99–111.
South, S. J., Bonjean, C. M., Markham, W. T., & Corder, J. (1982). Social structure and intergroup interaction: Men and women of the federal bureaucracy.American Sociological Review, 47, 587–499.
Swerdlow, M. (1989). Men's accommodation to women entering a nontraditional occupation: A case of rapid transit operatives.Gender and Society, 3, 373–387.
Tangri, S. S., Burt, M. R., & Johnson, L. B. (1982). Sexual harassment at work: Three explanatory models.Journal of Social Issues, 38, 33–54.
Terborg, J. R., & Ilgen, D. R. (1975). A theoretical approach to sex discrimination in traditionally masculine occupations.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 352–376.
Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D. (1986). A framework for the study of sexual harassment.Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 17–34.
Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D. (1989). The identification and classification of reactions to sexual harassment.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 1–14.
United Nations. (1975). Study conducted in 1975 by the U.N. ad hoc group on equal rights for women. In L. Farley (Ed.),Sexual shakedown: The sexual harassment of women on the job. New York: McGraw-Hill.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1991, January).Employment and earnings. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981).Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Walshok, M. L. (1981).Blue-collar women: Pioneers on the male frontier. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Waxman, M. (1990). Institutional strategies for dealing with sexual harassment.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 3, 73–75.
Wild, R., & Dawson, J. A. (1973). Prediction of the job attitudes and behaviours of female manual workers: A research note.Journal of Management Studies, 10, 113–117.
Wilson, K., Faison, R., & Britton, G. M. (1983). Cultural aspects of male sex aggression.Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 241–255.
White, M. J., Kruczek, T. A., Brown, M. T., & White, G. B. (1989). Occupational sex stereotypes among college students.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 34, 289–298.
York, K. M. (1989). Defining sexual harassment in workplaces: a policy-capturing approach.Academy of Management Journal, 32, 830–850.
York, K. M., & Brookhouse, K. J. (1988). The legal history of work-related sexual harassment and implications for employers.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1, 227–237.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ragins, B.R., Scandura, T.A. Antecedents and work-related correlates of reported sexual harassment: An empirical investigation of competing hypotheses. Sex Roles 32, 429–455 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544181
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544181