Skip to main content
Log in

Antecedents and work-related correlates of reported sexual harassment: An empirical investigation of competing hypotheses

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated antecedents and work-related correlates of reported sexual harassment by 365 primarily Caucasian women in male-typed, female-typed, and gender-integrated occupations. Two competing hypotheses on the antecedents of sexual harassment were tested. No support was found for the “contact hypothesis,” which holds that harassment is related to contact with the opposite gender. Partial support was found for the “sex role spillover” model, which holds that harassment is due to the transfer of gender roles to the workplace. No significant differences in reports of sexual harassment were found between women in male-typed, female-typed, and gender-integrated occupations. Within male-typed occupations, blue-collar women reported greater harassment than white-collar women, but were less likely to display assertive reactions to harassment. Investigation of work-related outcomes revealed that sexual harassment was positively related to reports of gender discrimination in promotion and employment practices, and had a negative impact on job satisfaction, particularly among blue-collar women. Theoretical implications of these results are discussed and a revision of the sex role spillover model is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, D. D., Terpstra, D. E., & Larntz, K. (1990). The influence of individual characteristics and severity of harassing behavior on reactions to sexual harassment.Sex Roles, 22, 305–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beggs, J. M., & Doolittle, D. C. (1993). Perceptions now and then of occupational sex typing: A replication of Shinar's 1975 study.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1435–1453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, N. E., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1987).The career psychology of women. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielby, W. T., & Baron, J. N. (1984). A woman's place is with other women: Sex segregation within organizations. In B. F. Reskin (Ed.),Sex segregation in the workplace. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J. (1985). Men's and women's networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization.Academy of Management Journal, 28, 327–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal.Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, L., & Perot, A. R. (1991). Reporting sexual harassment: Exploring a predictive model.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of National Affairs. (1987, June). Sexual harassment: Employer policies and problems.Personnel Policies Forum. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwill, N. L., & Colwill, H. D. (1986). Women with blue collars: The forgotten minority.Business Quarterly, 50, 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell University. (1975). Study conducted in 1975 by the Working Women's Institute. In L. Farley (Ed.),Sexual shakedown: the sexual harassment of women on the job. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corriher, S. E., & Booth, R. (1994).Sexual harassment and job satisfaction: The climate for women in an institution for higher-learning. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J. M., & Jacobs, R. R. (1985). The effect of working with women on male attitudes toward female firefighters.Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 6, 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crull, P. (1982). Stress effects of sexual harassment on the job: Implications for counseling.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 539–544.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S. L., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, Y., Ormerod, M., & Weitzman, L. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frierson, J. G. (1989). Reduce the costs of sexual harassment.Personnel Journal, 68, 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, M. S. (1986). The high cost of sexual harassment suits.Personnel Journal, 65, 75–78, 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfeld, S., Greiner, L., & Wood, M. M. (1980). The “feminine mystique” in male-dominated jobs: A comparison of attitudes and background factors of women in male-dominated versus female-dominated jobs.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 17, 291–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A. (1985).Sex and the workplace: The impact of sexual behavior and harassment on women, men, and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., & Cohen, A. G. (1987). Sex ratios, sex role spillover, and sex at work: A comparison of men's and women's experiences.Human Relations, 40, 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., & Dunwoody, V. (1987). Understanding sex in the workplace. In A. Stromberg, L. Larwood & B. A. Gutek (Eds.),Women and work: An annual review (Vol. 2). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., & Morasch, B. (1982). Sex-ratios, sex-role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work.Journal of Social Issues, 38, 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., Cohen, A. G., & Konrad, A. M. (1990). Predicting social-sexual behavior at work: A contact hypothesis.Academy of Management Journal, 33, 560–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R. P., & Pingree, S. (1978). Effects of changing proportions of the sexes on ratings of occupational prestige.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2, 314–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977).Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A. M., & Gutek, B. A. (1986). Impact of work experiences on attitudes toward sexual harassment.Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 422–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linenberger, P., & Keaveny, T. J. (1981). Sexual harassment in employment.Human Resource Management, 20, 11–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, J. A. (1982). Responses to sexual harassment on the job: Legal, organizational, and individual actions.Journal of Social Issues, 38, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, P. K., Koch, P. B., Henderson, J., Vicary, J. R., Cohn, M., & Young, E. (1991). The job climate for women in traditionally male blue-collar environments.Sex Roles, 25, 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Mechelle Vinson, 447 U.S. 57, 40 FEP cases 1822 (June 19, 1986).

  • Meyer, H., & Lee, M. (1978).Women in traditionally male jobs: The experiences of ten public utility companies, R & D Monograph No. 65, U.S. Department of Labor Report, ETA, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. (1981).Women and work: A psychological perspective. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Farrell, B. (1982). Women and nontraditional blue-collar jobs in the 1980's: An overview. In P. A. Wallace (Ed.),Women in the workplace. Boston: Auburn House.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Farrell, B. (1983. Women in blue-collar occupations: Traditional and nontraditional. In A. H. Stromberg & S. Harkess (Eds.),Working women: Theories and facts in perspective. Mountain View CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Farrell, B., & Harlan, S. L. (1982). Craftworkers and clerks: The effect of male co-worker hostility on women's satisfaction with non-traditional jobs.Social Problems, 29, 252–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, B., & Jacobs, J. A. (1983). Sex and consensus in occupational prestige ratings.Sociology and Social Research, 67, 392–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragins, B. R., & Sundstrom, E. (1989). Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective.Psychological Bulletin, 105, 51–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safran, C. (1976, November). What men do to women on the job: A shocking look at sexual harassment,Redbook, pp. 149, 217–223.

  • Sandroff, R. (1988, December). Sexual harassment in the Fortune 500.Working Woman, pp. 69–73.

  • Scheffield, C. J. (1987). Sexual terrorism: The social control of women. In B. B. Hess & M. M. Ferree (Eds.),Analyzing gender: A handbook of social science research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinar, E. H. (1975). Sexual stereotypes of occupations.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 7, 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, S. J., Bonjean, C. M., Markham, W. T., & Corder, J. (1982). Social structure and intergroup interaction: Men and women of the federal bureaucracy.American Sociological Review, 47, 587–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlow, M. (1989). Men's accommodation to women entering a nontraditional occupation: A case of rapid transit operatives.Gender and Society, 3, 373–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangri, S. S., Burt, M. R., & Johnson, L. B. (1982). Sexual harassment at work: Three explanatory models.Journal of Social Issues, 38, 33–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborg, J. R., & Ilgen, D. R. (1975). A theoretical approach to sex discrimination in traditionally masculine occupations.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 352–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D. (1986). A framework for the study of sexual harassment.Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D. (1989). The identification and classification of reactions to sexual harassment.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1975). Study conducted in 1975 by the U.N. ad hoc group on equal rights for women. In L. Farley (Ed.),Sexual shakedown: The sexual harassment of women on the job. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1991, January).Employment and earnings. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981).Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walshok, M. L. (1981).Blue-collar women: Pioneers on the male frontier. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waxman, M. (1990). Institutional strategies for dealing with sexual harassment.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 3, 73–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, R., & Dawson, J. A. (1973). Prediction of the job attitudes and behaviours of female manual workers: A research note.Journal of Management Studies, 10, 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K., Faison, R., & Britton, G. M. (1983). Cultural aspects of male sex aggression.Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. J., Kruczek, T. A., Brown, M. T., & White, G. B. (1989). Occupational sex stereotypes among college students.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 34, 289–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • York, K. M. (1989). Defining sexual harassment in workplaces: a policy-capturing approach.Academy of Management Journal, 32, 830–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • York, K. M., & Brookhouse, K. J. (1988). The legal history of work-related sexual harassment and implications for employers.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1, 227–237.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ragins, B.R., Scandura, T.A. Antecedents and work-related correlates of reported sexual harassment: An empirical investigation of competing hypotheses. Sex Roles 32, 429–455 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544181

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544181

Keywords

Navigation