This study investigated reactions to a hypothetical scenario describing a domestic dispute that ended in violence. In the scenario either the husband or the wife was the perpetrator of the physical violence, the violence either occurred under stress or after deliberation, and the perpetrator was subsequently jailed for 2 years. Results from 220 participants (109 males, 111 females) from metropolitan Adelaide, South Australia, showed significant main effects of stimulus person. Participants were more negative to the husband than to the wife in regard to responsibility for the offense, deservingness of the penalty, seriousness of the offense, perceived harshness of the penalty, reported positive affect, and reported sympathy. These main effects were qualified by interaction effects involving stimulus person (husband, wife) and situation (stress, deliberation), and stimulus person and gender of participant. The results suggested that there were different patterns of belief about the dynamics of domestic violence as well as a degree of in-group or same gender favoritism when female participants responded to the scenario involving the wife.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Dutton, D. G. (1992). Theoretical and empirical perspectives on the etiology and prevention of wife assault. In R. De V. Peters, R. J. McMahon, & V. L. Quinsey (Eds.),Aggression and violence throughout the life span. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Dutton, D. G. (1995).The domestic assault of women: Psychological and criminal justice perspectives. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature.Psychological Bulletin, 100 309–330.
Feather, N. T. (1990). Reactions to equal reward allocations: Effects of situation, gender, and values.British Journal of Social Psychology, 29 315–329.
Feather, N. T. (1996). Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 571–587.
Frieze, I. (1979). Perceptions of battered wives. In I. H. Frieze, D. Bar-Tal, & J. S. Carroll (Eds.),New approaches to social problems: Applications of attribution theory. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gerber, G. L. (1991). Gender stereotypes and power: Perceptions of roles in violent marriages.Sex Roles, 24 439–458.
Greene, E., Raitz, A., & Lindblad, H. (1989). Juror's knowledge of battered women.Journal of Family Violence, 4 105–125.
Ho, R., & Venus, M. (1995). Reactions to a battered woman who kills her abused spouse: An attributional analysis.Australian Journal of Psychology, 47 153–159.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988).Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group process. London: Routledge.
Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Intergroup behavior, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories.British Journal of Social Psychology, 26 325–340.
Kristiansen, C. M., & Guilietti, R. (1990). Perceptions of wife abuse: Effects of gender, attitudes toward women, and just-world beliefs among college students.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14 177–189.
Lagerspetz, K. M., Bjorkqvist, K., & Peltonen, T. (1988). Is indirect aggression typical of females? Gender differences in aggressiveness in 11 to 12 year old children.Aggressive Behavior, 14 403–414.
Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C.Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pierce, M. C., & Harris, R. J. (1993). The effect of provocation, race, and injury description on men's and women's perception of a wife-battering incident.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23 767–790.
Pierce, M. C., & Harris, R. J. (1994). Attributions about spouse abuse: It matters who the batterers and victims are.Sex Roles, 30 553–565.
Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1978).Assessment in special and remedial education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Saunders, D. G., Lynch, A. B., Grayson, M., & Linz, D. (1987). The inventory of beliefs about wife beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes.Violence and Victims, 2 39–57.
Saunders, D. G. (1988). Wife abuse, husband abuse, or mutual combat? A feminist perspective on the empirical findings. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.),Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14 101–113.
Shaver, K. G. (1985).The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Summers, G., & Feldman, N. S. (1984). Blaming the victim versus blaming the perpetrator: An attributional analysis of spouse abuse.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2 339–347.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.).Psychology in intergroup relations (2nd ed.) Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987),Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Walker, L. E. (1984).The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.
I am indebted to the Australian Research Council for funding this research.
About this article
Cite this article
Feather, N.T. Domestic violence, gender, and perceptions of justice. Sex Roles 35, 507–519 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544134
- Interaction Effect
- Social Psychology
- Positive Affect
- Domestic Violence
- Female Participant