Abstract
The use of facilitated communication with individuals with autism has generated considerable controversy over the past several years. Only recently has research begun appearing which examines the procedure using reasonable scientific controls to establish the validity of this form of communication. The present study assessed the validity of facilitated communication and evaluated the effects of facilitator influence with seven individuals with autism and mental retardation. Three individuals showed clear evidence of facilitator influence, another three showed no such influence, and one subject performed at chance levels. A follow-up session with the three subjects who showed no facilitator influence demonstrated that they also showed no unexpected language competence compared to their measured IQ and to assessment under standard conditions. Results are discussed in terms of significance for facilitated communication in general and in terms of the utility of the methodology as a means of demonstrating language competence or facilitator influence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beyer, W. H. (1966).Handbook of tables for probability and statistics. Cleveland, OH: The Chemical Rubber Company.
Biklen, D. (1990). Communication unbound: Autism and praxis.Harvard Educational Review, 60, 291–314.
Biklen, D. (1992) Typing to talk: Facilitated communication.American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 15–17.
Calculator, S. N., & Singer, K. M. (1992). Letter to the editor: Preliminary validation of facilitated communication.Topics in Language Disorders, 12, ix-xvi.
Crossley, R. (1988).Unexpected communication attainments by persons diagnosed as autistic and intellectually impaired. Caulfield, Victoria: Deal Communication Centre.
Crossley, R., & McDonald, A. (1980).Annie's coming out. New York: Penguin Books.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981).Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test — Revised: Manual for Forms L and M. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Green, G. (1992, October).Facilitated communication: Scientific and ethical issues. Waltham, MA: E. K. Shriver Center UAP Research Colloquium.
Hudson, A., Melita, B., & Arnold, N. (1993). Brief report: A case study assessing the validity of facilitated communication.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23, 165–173.
Intellectual Disability Review Panel. (1989).Report to the director-general on the validity and reliability of assisted communication. Melbourne, Victoria, AUST: Victoria Community Services.
Smith, M. D., & Belcher, R. G. (1993). Facilitated communication with adults with autism.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23, 175–183.
Wheeler, D. L., Jacobson, J. W., Paglieri, R. A., & Schwartz, A. A. (1993). An experimental assessment of facilitated communication.Mental Retardation, 31, 49–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oswald, D.P. Facilitator influence in facilitated communication. J Behav Educ 4, 191–199 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544112
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544112