Skip to main content
Log in

Some results comparing Monte Carlo simulation and first order Taylor series approximation for steady groundwater flow

  • Originals
  • Published:
Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The expected head and standard deviation of the head from the first order Taylor series approximation is compared to Monte Carlo simulation, for steady flow in a confined aquifer with transmissivity as a random variable. Emphasis is on the effect of changes in the covariance structure of the transmissivity, and pumping rates, on the errors in the first order Taylor series approximation. The accuracy of the first order Taylor series approximation is found to be particularly sensitive to pumping rates. With significant pumping the approximation is found to under estimate both the expected drawdown and head variance, and the error increases as the pumping rate increases. This can lead to large errors in probability constraints based on moments from the first order Taylor series approximation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dettinger, M.; Wilson, J. 1981: First order analysis of uncertainty in numerical models of groundwater flow, Part 1. Mathematical development, Water Resour. Res 17, 149–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeze, R. 1975: A stochastic-conceptual analysis of one-dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media, Water Resour. Res. 11, 725–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelhar, L. 1986: Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to applications, Water Resour. Res. 22, 135S-145S

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, R.; Kitanidas, P. 1985: Analysis of the spatial structure of properties of selected aquifers, Water Resour. Res. 21, 563–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitanidis, P.; Vomvoris, E. 1983: A geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in groundwater modeling (steady state) and one-dimensional simulation, Water Resour. Res. 19, 677–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Matalas, N. 1967: Mathematical assessment of synthetic hydrology, Water Resour. Res. 3, 937–945

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L.; Freeze, R. 1979a: Stochastic analysis of steady state groundwater flow in a bounded domain 1. One-dimensional simulations, Water Resour. Res. 15, 521–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L.; Freeze, R. 1979b: Stochastic analysis of steady state groundwater flow in a bounded domain, 2. Two-dimensional simulations, Water Resour. Res. 15, 1543–1559

    Google Scholar 

  • Townley, L. 1984: Second-order effects of uncertain transmissivities on predictions of piezometric heads. In: Finite elements in water resources, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference, New York: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Townley, L.; Wilson, J. 1985: Computationally efficient algorithms for parameter estimation and uncertainty propagation in numerical models of groundwater flow, Water Resour. Res. 21, 1851–1860

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, Y. 1986: Groundwater management by chance constrained model, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 112, 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, B.; Gorelick, S. 1987: Optimal groundwater quality management under parameter uncertainty, Water Resour. Res. 23, 1162–1174

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, L. Some results comparing Monte Carlo simulation and first order Taylor series approximation for steady groundwater flow. Stochastic Hydrol Hydraul 3, 179–190 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01543858

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01543858

Key words

Navigation