Abstract
An analysis of the social welfare movement suggests two simultaneous but divergent philosophies within that movement. One philosophy includes a commitment to the individual client and action to increase the individual's opportunity to select his own goals and methods of achieving such goals. The opposing position assumes that superior wisdom comes from being a member of the professional class and commits the professional to dictating the modes and goals of living of those he presumably serves. It is proposed that the social welfare movement may be at an important decision-making point in its history, and the case is made that a decision for maximizing individual freedom is of the greatest importance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Legislative Reference Service, Library of Congress. The Congress.The Constitution of the United States of America—analysis and interpretation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1964.
Lindman, F. T., &McIntyre, D. H., Jr. (Eds.),The mentally disabled and the law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.
Popper, K. R. The open society and its enemies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1950.
Ross, H. A. Commitment of the mentally ill: problems of law and policy.Mich. Law Rev., 1959,57, 945–1018.
Sulzer, E. S. Reinforcement and the therapeutic contract.J. counsel. Psychol., 1962,9, 271–276.
Sulzer, E. S. Demagogues and mental health: a look at both sides.Commun, ment. Hlth J., 1965,1, 14–18.
Sulzer, E. S. Involuntary institutionalization: some legal, ethical, and social implications.ETC: A review of general semantics, 1966,23, 331–345.
Szasz, T. S. Law, liberty, and psychiatry. New York: Macmillan, 1963.
Szasz, T. S. Psychiatric justice. New York: Macmillan, 1965.
U.S. Public Health Service.A draft act governing hospitalization of the mentally ill. Publ. No. 51, rev. ed. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1952.
U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary.Constitutional rights of the mentally ill. Part 1—Civil Aspects. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1961.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An earlier version of this paper was read at the 92nd Annual Forum of the National Conference on Social Welfare, Atlantic City, May, 1965, as part of a meeting on “Mental Illness, Mental Retardation, and the Law.”
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sulzer, E.S. Individual freedom, law, and social welfare. Community Ment Health J 3, 49–52 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01543066
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01543066