The dearth of information regarding orgasm in postoperative transsexuals prompted the authors to study its prevalence. The sample consisted of 14 male-to-female (M—F) and 9 female-to-male (F—M) postoperative transsexuals. The relationship of orgasm to sexual and general satisfaction was explored via a specially designed questionnaire. Orgastic capacity declined in the M—F group and increased in the (F—M) group. Despite the decrease in orgasm in the M—F group, satisfaction with sex and general satisfaction with the results of surgery were high in both groups. General satisfaction of 86% replicates other studies. Frequency of sex increased by 75% in the M—F group and by 100% in the F—M group. A phalloplasty does not appear to be a critical factor in orgasm or in sexual satisfaction. The general conclusion is reached that it is possible to change one's body image and sexual identity and be sexually satisfied despite inadequate sexual functioning.
Key wordstranssexual postoperative orgasm sexual satisfaction outcome studies
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blanchard, R., Steiner, B., Clemmensen, L., and Dickey, R. (1989). Prediction of regrets in post-operative transsexuals.Can. J. Psychiat. 34: 43–45.Google Scholar
- Green, R., and Fleming, D. T. (1990). Transsexual surgery follow-up: Status in the 1990's. In Bancroft, J., Davis, C. M., and Weinstein, D. (eds.),Annual Review of Sex Research, Vol.1, Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, pp. 163–174.Google Scholar
- Martin, J. (1988). The incidence, frequency and rate of genital satisfaction of sixty-four post-operative male to female transsexuals reported to be experienced during various sexual behaviors: A descriptive study, Ph.D dissertation, The Institute for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
- Pauly, I. (1981). Outcome of sex reassignment surgery for transsexuals.Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiat. 15: 45–51.Google Scholar
- Pauly, I. (1990). Gender identity disorders: Evaluation and treatment,J. Sex Educ. Ther. 16: 2–24.Google Scholar