Skip to main content
Log in

Ambiguous stimuli: Sex is in the eye of the beholder

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is usually assumed that sexual material is easily identifiable by its content. The present study investigated whether subjects could be led to interpret ambiguous material as sexual or not via simple instructions. Thematically ambiguous written text was presented to 269 subjects. The principal independent variable was the content of advance information. Advance information was designed to suggest that the accompanying text had either a sexual or a nonsexual theme. After reading the story and completing an intervening task, subjects completed recall and recognition tasks based on the text. These data were used to determine the theme or story interpretation given by subjects. The information contained in the advance organizers influenced subjects' memories for and interpretations of the ambiguous story. When the story was preceded by introductory information that suggested sexual content, subjects tended to attribute sexual meaning to the story. Other subjects attributed a nonsexual meaning to the same text when it was preceded by nonsexual information. Findings suggest that under certain conditions, sex is in the “eye of the beholder.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1990).Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, 3rd ed., Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., and Pichert, J. W. (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective.J. Verbal Learning Verbal Behav. 17: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., and Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse.Am. Educ. Res. J. 14: 367–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., and Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall.J. Verbal Learning Verbal Behav. 11: 71–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., and ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57: 212–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H., and McGlone, M. S. (1990). Sex differences in memory for erotica.Cognit. Emot. 4: 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., and Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychol. Rev. 85: 363–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozminsky, E. (1977). Altering comprehension: The effect of biasing titles on text comprehension.Memory Cognit. 5: 482–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., Averill, J. R., and Opton, E. M., Jr. (1970). Toward a cognitive theory of emotion. In Arnold, M. (ed.),Feelings and Emotions Academic Press, New York, pp. 207–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., Kanner, A. D., and Folkman, S. (1980). Emotions: A cognitive-phenomenological analysis. In Plutchik, R., and Kellerman, H. (eds.),Emotion: Theory, Research, and Experience, Academic Press, New York, pp. 189–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. (1975).Mind and Emotion, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. (1980). The generation of emotion: A psychological theory. In Pultchik, R., and Kellerman, H. (eds.),Theories of Emotion, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. L. (1988). Revised Mosher guilt inventory. In C. M. Davis, C. M., Yarber, W. L., and Davis, S. L. (eds.), Sexuality-Related Measures: A Compendium, Graphic, Lake Mills, IA, pp. 152–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. L., and Cross, H. J. (1971). Sex guilt and premarital sexual experiences of college students.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol, 36: 27–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, J., Bower, G. H., and Black, J. B. (1979). The “soap opera” effect in story recall.Memory Cognit. 7: 185–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E., and Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In Anderson, R. C., Spiro, R. J., and Montague, W. E. (eds.),Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge, Wiley, New York, pp. 99–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, S., and Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.Psychol. Rev. 69: 379–397.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schallert, D. L. (1976). Improving memory for prose: The relationship between depth of processing and context.J. Verbal Learning Verbal Behav. 15: 621–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. S. (1981). Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity.J. Verbal Learning Verbal Behav. 20: 120–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., and Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of appraisal in emotion.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 48: 813–838.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, J. L. (1986). The psychophysiology of sexual arousal: An information-processing approach. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook.Diss. Abstr. Int. 48: 574B.

  • Walen, S. R., and Roth, D. (1987). The cognitive approach. In Geer, J. H., and O'Donohue, W. T. (eds.),Theories of Human Sexuality, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 335–362.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castille, C.O., Geer, J.H. Ambiguous stimuli: Sex is in the eye of the beholder. Arch Sex Behav 22, 131–143 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542362

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542362

Key words

Navigation