Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 559–585 | Cite as

Effects of recalled childhood gender nonconformity on adult genitoerotic role and AIDS exposure

  • James D. Weinrich
  • Igor Grant
  • Denise L. Jacobson
  • S. Renée Robinson
  • J. Allen McCutchan
  • the HNRC Group
Article

Abstract

The connections between childhood gender nonconformity (assessed by the Freund Feminine Gender Identity Scale, or FGI) and adult genitoerotic role (assessed by a sex history) were examined. The core sample was a group of 106 men who had sex with other men before 1980 and who are currently enrolled in two longitudinal studies of AIDS. Although other workers have cautioned against assuming a priori that childhood gender role is inherently related to adult preferences for particular sexual acts, our data suggest that there is at least a statistical association between these two concepts. In particular, the FGI (and many of its factors and items) are significantly associated with preferences for receptive anal intercourse and, less clearly, with oral-anal contact — but not with oral-genital intercourse or insertive anal intercourse. Suggestions for AIDS prevention and safe-sex awareness are made on the basis of these findings. The data also suggest that in sex research involving homosexual men, the correct genitoerotic role distinction is not insertive vs. receptive behaviors, or even insertive vs. receptive anal intercourse, but receptive anal intercourse vs. all other behaviors.

Key words

genitoerotic roles homosexuality childhood gender nonconformity Freund Feminine Gender Identity Scale insertor/insertee anal intercourse 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blanchard, R. (1985). Typology of male-to-female transsexualism.Arch. Sex. Behav. 14: 247–261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanchard, R. (1988). Nonhomosexual gender dysphoria.J. Sex Res. 24: 188–193.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchard, R., and Clemmenson, L. H. (1988). A test of the DSM-III-R's implicit assumption that fetishistic arousal and gender dysphoria are mutually exclusive.J. Sex Res. 25: 426–432.Google Scholar
  4. Blanchard, R., Racansky, I. G., and Steiner, B. W. (1986). Phallometric detection of fetishistic arousal in heterosexual male cross-dressers.J. Sex Res. 22: 452–462.Google Scholar
  5. Carrier, J. M. (1976). Cultural factors affecting urban Mexican male homosexual behavior.Arch. Sex. Behav. 5: 103–124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrier, J. M. (1977). “Sex-role preference” as an explanatory variable in homosexual behavior.Arch. Sex. Behav. 6: 53–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrier, J. M. (1980). Homosexual behavior in cross-cultural perspective. In Marmor, J. (ed.),Homosexual Behavior: A Modern Reappraisal Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, E., Gooren, L., and Ross, M. (1989). Theories of gender transpositions: A critique and suggestions for further research.J. Sex Res. 26: 525–538.Google Scholar
  9. Freund, K. W. (1974). Male homosexuality: An analysis of the pattern. In Loraine, J. A. (ed.),Understanding Homosexuality: Its Biological and Psychological Bases American Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Freund, K. W., Nagler, E., Langevin, R., Zajac, A., and Steiner, B. W. (1974). Measuring feminine gender identity in homosexual males.Arch. Sex. Behav. 3: 249–260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Freund, K. W., Steiner, B. W., and Chan, S. (1982). Two types of cross-gender identity.Arch. Sex. Behav. 11: 49–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Klein, F., Sepekoff, B., and Wolf, T. J. (1985). Sexual orientation: A multi-variable dynamic process.J. Homosex. 11(1/2): 35–49.Google Scholar
  13. Ostrow, D. G., Altmann, N., Wallemark, C.-B., Goldsmith, J., Kalish, S. B., Kyrias, C. A., Chmiel, J. S., and Phair, J. P. (1984). Patterns of sexual behavior, 1979–1983.International Conjoint Conference on Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Montréal, Canada: 20.Google Scholar
  14. Pillard, R. C., and Weinrich, J. D. (1987). The periodic table model of the gender transpositions. Part I. A theory based on masculinization and defeminization of the brain.J. Sex Res. 23: 425–454.Google Scholar
  15. Stein, M. L. (1974).Lovers, Friends, Slaves⋯: The Nine Male Sexual Types, Their Psychosexual Transactions with Call Girls, Berkley, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Weinrich, J. D., Snyder, P. J., Pillard, R. C., Grant, I., Jacobsen, D. L., Robinson, S. R., and McCutchan, J. A. (1993). A factor analysis of the Klein Sexual Orientation Grid in two disparate samples.Arch. Sex. Behav. 22: in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • James D. Weinrich
    • 1
  • Igor Grant
    • 1
  • Denise L. Jacobson
    • 1
  • S. Renée Robinson
    • 1
  • J. Allen McCutchan
    • 1
  • the HNRC Group
  1. 1.HIV Neurobehavioral Research CenterUniversity of California, San DiegoSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations