Effects of recalled childhood gender nonconformity on adult genitoerotic role and AIDS exposure
The connections between childhood gender nonconformity (assessed by the Freund Feminine Gender Identity Scale, or FGI) and adult genitoerotic role (assessed by a sex history) were examined. The core sample was a group of 106 men who had sex with other men before 1980 and who are currently enrolled in two longitudinal studies of AIDS. Although other workers have cautioned against assuming a priori that childhood gender role is inherently related to adult preferences for particular sexual acts, our data suggest that there is at least a statistical association between these two concepts. In particular, the FGI (and many of its factors and items) are significantly associated with preferences for receptive anal intercourse and, less clearly, with oral-anal contact — but not with oral-genital intercourse or insertive anal intercourse. Suggestions for AIDS prevention and safe-sex awareness are made on the basis of these findings. The data also suggest that in sex research involving homosexual men, the correct genitoerotic role distinction is not insertive vs. receptive behaviors, or even insertive vs. receptive anal intercourse, but receptive anal intercourse vs. all other behaviors.
Key wordsgenitoerotic roles homosexuality childhood gender nonconformity Freund Feminine Gender Identity Scale insertor/insertee anal intercourse
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blanchard, R. (1988). Nonhomosexual gender dysphoria.J. Sex Res. 24: 188–193.Google Scholar
- Blanchard, R., and Clemmenson, L. H. (1988). A test of the DSM-III-R's implicit assumption that fetishistic arousal and gender dysphoria are mutually exclusive.J. Sex Res. 25: 426–432.Google Scholar
- Blanchard, R., Racansky, I. G., and Steiner, B. W. (1986). Phallometric detection of fetishistic arousal in heterosexual male cross-dressers.J. Sex Res. 22: 452–462.Google Scholar
- Carrier, J. M. (1980). Homosexual behavior in cross-cultural perspective. In Marmor, J. (ed.),Homosexual Behavior: A Modern Reappraisal Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
- Coleman, E., Gooren, L., and Ross, M. (1989). Theories of gender transpositions: A critique and suggestions for further research.J. Sex Res. 26: 525–538.Google Scholar
- Freund, K. W. (1974). Male homosexuality: An analysis of the pattern. In Loraine, J. A. (ed.),Understanding Homosexuality: Its Biological and Psychological Bases American Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
- Klein, F., Sepekoff, B., and Wolf, T. J. (1985). Sexual orientation: A multi-variable dynamic process.J. Homosex. 11(1/2): 35–49.Google Scholar
- Ostrow, D. G., Altmann, N., Wallemark, C.-B., Goldsmith, J., Kalish, S. B., Kyrias, C. A., Chmiel, J. S., and Phair, J. P. (1984). Patterns of sexual behavior, 1979–1983.International Conjoint Conference on Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Montréal, Canada: 20.Google Scholar
- Pillard, R. C., and Weinrich, J. D. (1987). The periodic table model of the gender transpositions. Part I. A theory based on masculinization and defeminization of the brain.J. Sex Res. 23: 425–454.Google Scholar
- Stein, M. L. (1974).Lovers, Friends, Slaves⋯: The Nine Male Sexual Types, Their Psychosexual Transactions with Call Girls, Berkley, New York.Google Scholar
- Weinrich, J. D., Snyder, P. J., Pillard, R. C., Grant, I., Jacobsen, D. L., Robinson, S. R., and McCutchan, J. A. (1993). A factor analysis of the Klein Sexual Orientation Grid in two disparate samples.Arch. Sex. Behav. 22: in press.Google Scholar