Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 233–246 | Cite as

The habituation of sexual arousal

  • William T. O'Donohue
  • James H. Geer

Abstract

The effects of two levels of stimulus intensity (medium and high) and two levels of stimulus variability (varied stimuli and constant stimuli) on the habituation of subjective and physiological sexual arousal were investigated in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Forty male volunteers served as subjects. It was hypothesized that, as compared to constant stimuli, varied stimuli would produce higher rates of response attenuation on indices of sexual arousal. This hypothesis was confirmed for both penile response and a subjective measure of sexual arousal. Second, it was hypothesized that stimuli of medium intensity would produce higher rates of response of attentuation on subjective and physiological indices of sexual arousal than would stimuli of high intensity. This hypothesis was partially confirmed for subjective arousal but was not confirmed for the physiological measure of sexual arousal. These results were interpreted as supporting the notions that sexual arousal to erotic stimuli decreases with repeated stimulus presentations and, since the experimental design properly controlled for physiological fatigue, that a habituation process is involved in this observed decrement. The implications of habituation for sex research are discussed.

Key words

habituation sexual arousal genital measures 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bancroft, J. H. J. (1976). Psychological and physiological responses to sexual stimuli in men and women. In Levi, L. (ed.),Society, Stress and Disease. III. The Productive and Reproductive Age Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, D., Becker, R., Leitenburg, H., and Agras, W. (1970). A mechanical strain gauge for recording penile circumference change.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 3: 73–76.Google Scholar
  3. Beach, F., and Ransom, T. (1967). Effects of environmental variation on ejaculatory frequency in male rats.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 64: 384–387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bermant, G., and Davidson, J. M. (1974).Biological Bases of Sexual Behavior. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Bermant, G., Lott, D., and Anderson, L. (1968). Temporal characteristics of the Coolidge effect in male rat copulatory behavior.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 65: 447–452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Deese, J. (1958).The Psychology of Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Dewsbury, D. A. (1981). Effects of novelty on copulatory behavior: The Coolidge effect and related phenomena.Psychol. Bull. 89: 464–482.Google Scholar
  8. Graham, F. K. (1973). Habituation and dishabituation of responses innervated by the autonomic nervous system. In Peeke, H. V. S. and Herz, M. J. (eds.),Habituation. I. Behavioral Studies Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Heiman, J. L. (1977). A physiological exploration of sexual arousal patterns in females and males.Psychophysiology 14: 266–274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Howard, J. L., Reifler, C. B., and Liptzin, M. B. (1970). Effects of exposure to pornography. Technical reports of the Commission of Obscenity and Pornography (Vol. B), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  11. Korff, J., and Geer, J. H. (1983). The relationship between sexual arousal experience and genital response.Psychophysiology 20: 121–127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mehrabian, A., and Russell, J. A. (1974).An Approach to Environmental Psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  13. O'Gorman, J. G. (1977). Individual differences in habituation of human physiological responses: A review of theory, method, and findings in the study of personality correlates in non-clinical populations.Biol. Psychol. 5: 257–328.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Olst, E. H. (1971).The Orienting Reflex. Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  15. Rubin, H. B., Henson, D. E., Falvo, R. E., and High, R. W. (1979). The relationship between men's endogenous levels of testosterone and their penile responses to erotic stimuli.Behav. Res. Ther. 3: 305–312.Google Scholar
  16. Schaefer, H. H., and Colgan, A. H. (1977). The effect of pornography on penile tumescence as a function of reinforcement and novelty.Behav. Ther. 8: 938–946.Google Scholar
  17. Schaefer, H. H., Tregerthan, G. J., and Colgan, A. H. (1976). Measured and self-estimated penile erection.Behav. Ther. 7: 1–7.Google Scholar
  18. Tanner, B. (1973). Shock intensity and fear of shock in the modification of homosexual behavior in males by avoidance learning.Behav. Res. Ther. 11: 305–312.Google Scholar
  19. Thompson, R. F., and Spencer, W. A. (1966). Habituation: A model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior.Psychol. Rev. 73: 16–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Zuckerman, M. (1971). Physiological measures of sexual arousal in the human.Psychol. Bull. 75: 297–329.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • William T. O'Donohue
    • 1
  • James H. Geer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyState University of New York at Stony BrookStony BrookUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyLousiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations