Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 203–215 | Cite as

The effect of question preface on response rates to a telephone survey of sexual experience

  • Michael W. Wiederman
  • David L. Weis
  • Elizabeth Rice Allgeier


Given the heavy reliance on self-report measures in research on sexuality, issues surrounding nonresponse rates are of particular importance. Phone interviews were conducted with 400 adults living in a midsized midwestern city. Rates of nonresponse and reported sexual experience were analyzed as a function of the type of preface statement provided for four questions related to sexual behavior. One preface was general; the other referred to public concern over AIDS. On questions regarding number of sexual partners in the past year and involvement in extramarital sex, women who were given the AIDS preface were significantly more likely to answer the questions than were women who received the general preface. However, for both men and women, reported rates of sexual experience did not differ as a function of the preface statement. Differences between responders and nonresponders were explored. Men were more likely to respond to the sexual items. Education, age, marital status, and religious affiliation were unrelated to rates of response to the sexual questions. For men, responders to the sexuality items reported greater yearly incomes than did nonresponders. Some differences in reported sexual behavior were also found between responders and nonresponders; nonresponders consistently reported less sexual experience. Implications for research on sexuality and future investigation of factors affecting response to sexual items are discussed.

Key words

questionnaire methodology response bias telephone surveys gender differences demographics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allgeier, E. R., and Allgeier, A. R. (1991).Sexual Interactions 3rd ed., D. C. Heath, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, B., and Broffitt, B. (1988). Is there a valid and reliable self-report measure of sexual behavior?Arch. Sex. Behav. 17: 509–524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradburn, N., Sudman, S., Blair, E., and Stocking, C. (1978). Question threat and response bias.Public Opinion Quart. 42: 221–234.Google Scholar
  4. Catania, J. A. (1990). The AIDS epidemic: Quantitative assessment in human sexuality research. In Chouinard, A. and Albert, J. (eds.),Human Sexuality: Research Perspectives in a World Facing AIDS The International Development and Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 69–91.Google Scholar
  5. Catania, J., Gibson, D., Marin, B., Coates, T., and Greenblatt, R. (1990). Response bias in assessing sexual behaviors relevant to HIV transmission.Eval. Prog. Plann. 13: 19–29.Google Scholar
  6. Catania, J. A., McDermott, L. J., and Pollack, L. M. (1986). Questionnaire response bias and face-to-face interview sample bias in sexuality research.J. Sex Res. 22: 52–72.Google Scholar
  7. Clement, U. (1990). Surveys of heterosexual behavior. In Bancroft, J., Davis, C. M., and Weinstein, D. (eds.),Annual Review of Sex Research The Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, Mt. Vernon, IA, pp. 45–74.Google Scholar
  8. DeLamater, J., and MacCorquodale, P. (1975). The effects of interview schedule variations on reported sexual behavior.Sociol. Methods Res. 4: 215–236.Google Scholar
  9. DeLamater, J., and MacCorquodale, P. (1979).Premarital Sexuality: Attitudes, Relationships, Behavior University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  10. Farkas, G., Sine, L., and Evans, I. (1978). Personality, sexuality, and demographic differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers for a laboratory study of male sexual behavior.Arch. Sex. Behav. 7: 513–520.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Herold, E., and Way, L. (1988). Sexual self-disclosure among university women.J. Sex Res. 24, 1–14.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, R. E. (1970). Extramarital sexual intercourse: A methodological note.J. Marr. Fam. 32: 279–282.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, W., and DeLamater, J. (1976). Response effects in sex surveys.Public Opinion Quart. 40: 165–181.Google Scholar
  14. Kaats, G., and Davis, K. (1971). Effects of volunteer biases in studies of sexual behavior and attitudes.J. Sex Res. 7: 26–34.Google Scholar
  15. Klecka, W., and Tuchfarber, A. (1978). Random-digit dialing: A comparison to personal surveys.Public Opinion Quart. 42: 105–114.Google Scholar
  16. Lavrakas, P. (1987). Telephone Survey Methods: Sampling, Selection and Supervision. InApplied Social Research Series, 7 Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  17. Morokoff, P. J. (1986). Volunteer bias in the psychophysiological study of female sexuality.J. Sex Res. 22: 35–51.Google Scholar
  18. Nirenberg, T. D., Wincz, J. P., Bansal, S., Liepman, M. R., Engle-Friedman, M., and Begin, A. (1991). Volunteer bias in a study of male alcoholics' sexual behavior.Arch. Sex. Behav. 20: 371–379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rodgers, J. (1982). The recission of behaviors: Inconsistent responses in adolescent sexuality data.Soc. Sci. Res. 11: 280–296.Google Scholar
  20. Rogers, T. (1976). Interviews by telephone and in person: Quality of responses and field performance.Public Opinion Quart. 40: 51–65.Google Scholar
  21. Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. (1969). The volunteer subject. In Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. (eds.),Artifact in Behavioral Research Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Saunders, D., Fisher, W., Hewitt, E., and Clayton, J. (1985). A method for empirically assessing volunteer selection effects: Recruitment procedures and responses to erotica.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 49: 1703–1712.Google Scholar
  23. Sudman, S., and Bradburn, N. (1974).Response Effects in Surveys Aldine, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  24. Sudman, S., and Bradburn, N. (1983).Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  25. Wolchik, S., Braver, S., and Jensen, K. (1985). Volunteer bias in erotica research: Effects of intrusiveness of measure and sexual background.Arch. Sex. Behav. 14: 93–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wolchik, S., Spencer, S., and Lisi, I. (1983). Volunteer bias in research employing vaginal measures of sexual arousal.Arch. Sex. Behav. 12: 399–408.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael W. Wiederman
    • 1
  • David L. Weis
    • 2
  • Elizabeth Rice Allgeier
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  2. 2.Applied Human EcologyBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations