Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rape trauma syndrome as scientific expert testimony

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Behavioral science studies conducted on rape victims reveal a posttraumatic stress disorder which follows the attack known as rape trauma syndrome. Evidence of rape trauma syndrome can be very useful in explaining the behavior of rape victims. Rape trauma syndrome can help corroborate the victim's assertion of lack of consent and also help the jury understand the typical reactions of rape victims. Courts have held that expert testimony of rape trauma syndrome is admissible as evidence of (i) lack of consent, (ii) the amount of damages in civil suits, (iii) a defense to culpable behavior, and (iv) an explanation for behavior of the victim that is inconsistent with the claim of rape. Rape trauma syndrome meets the requirements for admissibility when it is used for the proper purpose and with adequate safeguards to prevent any unfair prejudice. Based on case precedent on the admissibility of rape trauma syndrome as scientific expert testimony, rape trauma syndrome should be admissible if (i) the evidence presented only shows the typical reactions to rape and does not make any legal conclusions as to whether the victim was raped, (ii) the expert is qualified, (iii) a proper foundation is laid, (iv) liberal cross-examination of the expert is allowed, and (v) the defense can introduce its own expert testimony on rape trauma syndrome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alphonso v. Charity Hospital of Louisiana at New Orleans, La. App. 413 So. 2d 982 (1982).cert. denied, 415 So. 2n 952 (1982).

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 3rd ed., APA, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1987).Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 3rd ed., rev., APA, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkeson, B., Calhoun, K., Resick, P., and Ellis, E. (1982). Victims of rape: Repeated assessment of depressive symptoms.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 50: 96–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, A., and Holmstrom, L. (1974). Rape trauma syndrome.Am. J. Psychiat. 131: 980–986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth v. Baldwin, Pa. 502 A. 2d 253 (1985).

  • Commonwealth v. Gallagher, Pa. 547 A.2d 355 (1988).

  • Division of Corrections v. Wynn. Fl. App. 438 So. 2d 446 (1983).

  • Ellis, E. (1983). A review of empirical rape research: Victim reactions and response to treatment.Clin. Psychol. Rev. 3: 473–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, E., Calhoun, K., and Atkeson, B. (1981). An assessment of long-term reaction to rape.J. Abn. Psychol. 90: 221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Rules of Evidence. (1988). Foundation Press, Westbury, NY.

  • Frank, E., Turner, S., and Stewart, B. (1980). Initial response to rape: The impact of factors within the rape situation.J. Behav. Assess. 2: 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, E., Turner, S., Stewart, B., Jacob, M., and West, D. (1981). Past psychiatric symptoms and response to sexual assault.Comprehen. Psychiat. 22: 479–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, P., Borgida, E. (1985). Rape trauma syndrome evidence in court.Am. Psychol. 40: 984–992.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).

  • McCord, D. (1985). The admissibility of expert testimony regarding rape trauma syndrome in rape prosecutions,Boston Coll.Law Rev. 26: 1143–1213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J., and Feldman-Summers, S. (1981). Factors related to the psychological impacts of rape on the victim.J. Abn. Psychol. 90: 562–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • People v. Bledsoe, 203 Cal. Rep. 461 (1984).

  • People v. Mathews, 91 Cal. App. 3d 1018 (1979).

  • People v. Pullins, Mi. 378 N.W.2d 506 (1983).

  • People v. Reid, 475 N.Y.S.2d 741 (1984).

  • Scadden v. State, Wy. 732 P.2d 1036 (1987).

  • State v. Allewalt, Md. 517 A.2d 741 (1986).

  • State v. Black, 109 Wash.2d 335 (1987).

  • State v. Broadniak, Mt. 718 P.2d 322 (1986).

  • State v. Harwood, Or. App. 609 P. 2d 1312 (1980).

  • State v. Hudnall, S. C. 359 S.E.2d 59 (1987).

  • State v. Huey, Az. 699 P.2d 1290 (1985).

  • State v. Marks, Kan. 647 P.2d 1292 (1982).

  • State v. McCoy, W. V. 366 S.E.2d 731 (1988).

  • State v. Middleton, Or. 657 P.2d 1215 (1983).

  • State v. Petit, 66 Or. App. 575 (1984).

  • State v. Saldana, Minn. 234 N.W.2d 227 (1982).

  • State v. Staples, N.H. 415 A.2d 320 (1980).

  • State v. Taylor, Mo. 663 S.W.2d 235 (1984).

  • White v. Violent Crimes Compensation Board, N.J. 388 A.2d 206 (1978).

  • Wilk, P. (1984). Expert testimony on rape trauma syndrome: Admissibility and effective use in criminal rape prosecution.Am. Univ. Law Rev. 33: 417, 462.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Block, A.P. Rape trauma syndrome as scientific expert testimony. Arch Sex Behav 19, 309–323 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541926

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541926

Key words

Navigation