Abstract
Theories of human sexuality have proposed that two factors reduce the double standard of sexuality and lead to a convergence of male and female sexual behavior: the degree of social benefits and amount of power women have in basic societal institutions and the extent to which a society accepts permissive sexual norms. As these factors increase, the strength of the double standard will decrease and the convergence between male and female behaviors will increase. Compared to the United States, Sweden has instituted more policies to promote gender equality and has been thought to accept more permissive premarital sexual attitudes. The focus of the research reported here is to examine country and gender differences in sexual attitudes and sexual behavior for a sample of university students in the United States (N = 407) and Sweden (N = 570). Results indicate that Swedish students endorsed more similar sexual standards for women and men and reported more accepting attitudes than did American students. For sexual behavior, American men reported the most sexual experience, Swedish men the least, with the women of both countries generally in the middle category. Notwithstanding this more permissive behavior on the part of American men, gender convergence with respect to sexual behavior is stronger in Sweden on several of the dimensions examined: age of first engaging in partner-related sexual activities for those who were sexually experienced, relationship with first partner, number of partners both in the last year and in their lifetime, and affective reactions to first coitus. Gender convergence, however, is weaker in Sweden than in the United States with respect to the incidence and frequency of various sexual activities and the degree of satisfaction with current sex life. Findings are discussed with respect to the questions they raise about the current theories that framed this research and the differential amount of sex education provided in the two countries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atwood, J. D., and Gagnon, J. (1987). Masturbatory behavior in college youth.J. Sex Educ. Ther. 13: 35–42.
Bell, R. R., and Coughey, K. (1980). Premarital sexual experience among college females.Fam. Rel. 29: 353–357.
Bishop, P. D., and Lipsitz, A. (1991). Sexual behavior among college students in the AIDS era: A comparative study.J. Psychol. Hum. Sex. 4: 135–148.
Carroll, J. L., Volk, K. D., and Hyde, J. S. (1985). Differences between males and females in motives for engaging in sexual intercourse.Arch. Sex. Behav. 14: 131–139.
Christensen, H. T. (1969). Normative theory derived from cross-cultural family research.J. Marr. Fam. 31: 209–222.
Christensen, H. T., and Gregg, C. F. (1970). Changing sex norms in America and Scandinavia.J. Marr. Fam. 32: 616–627.
Clark, R. D., and Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers.J. Psychol. Hum. Sex. 2: 39–55.
Clement, U., Schmidt, G., and Kruse, M. (1984). Changes in sex differences in sexual behavior: A replication of a study on West German students (1966–1981).Arch. Sex. Behav. 13: 99–120.
Craig, M. (1990). Coercive sexuality in dating relationships: A situational model.Clin. Psychol. Rev. 10: 395–423.
Darling, C. A., and Davidson, J. K., Sr. (1987). Guilt: A factor in sexual satisfaction.Soc. Inquiry 57: 252–271.
Darling, C. A., Kallen, D. J., and VanDosen, J. E. (1984). Sex in transition.J. Youth Adolescence 13: 385–389.
DeLamater, J. (1987). Gender differences in sexual scenarios. In Kelly, K. (ed.),Females, Male and Sexuality, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
DeLamater, J., and MacCorquodale, P. (1979).Premarital Sexuality, Attitudes, Relationships, Behavior, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
Earle, J. R., and Perricone, P. J. (1986). Premarital sexuality: A ten-year study of attitudes and behavior on a small university campus.J. Sex Res. 22: 304–310.
Grauerholz, E., and Serpe, R. T. (1985). Initiation and response: The dynamics of sexual interaction.Sex Roles 12: 1041–1059.
Hacker, S. S. (1990). The transition from the old norm to the new: Sexual values for the 1990s.SIECUS 18: 1–8.
Hendrick, S., Hendrick, C., Slapion-Foote, M., and Foot, F. (1985). Gender differences in sexual attitudes.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 48: 1630–1642.
Jones, E. F., Forrest, J. D., Goldman, N., Henshaw, S., Lincoln, R., Rosoff, J. I., Westoff, C. F., and Wulf, D. (1986).Teenage Pregnancy in Industrialized Countries, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Keller, J. F., Elliott, S. S., and Gunberg, E. (1982). Premarital sexual intercourse among single college students: A discriminant analysis.Sex Roles 8: 21–32.
King, K., Balswick, J. O., and Robinson, I. E. (1977). The continuing premarital sexual revolution among college females.J. Marr. Fam. 39: 455–459.
Knox, D., and Wilson, W. (1981). Dating behaviors of university students.Fam. Rel. 30: 255–258.
Leitenberg, H., Detzer, M. J., and Srebnik, D. (1993). Gender differences in masturbation and the relation of masturbation experience in preadolescence and/or early adolescence to sexual adjustment in young adulthood.Arch. Sex. Behav. 22: 87–98.
Lewin, B. (1982). The adolescent boy and girl: First and other early experience with intercourse from a representative sample of Swedish school adolescents.Arch. Sex. Behav. 2: 417–428.
Lewin, B. (1987). Adolescent sexuality: Changing behavior and lasting trust in the family. Paper presented at the International Seminar on Young People and Their Parents, Freising-Munchen, Germany.
Linner, B. (1967).Sex and Society in Sweden, Lowe and Brydone, London.
Lottes, I. L. (1985). The use of cluster analysis to determine belief patterns of sexual attitudes.J. Sex Res. 21: 405–421.
Lottes, I. L. (1993). Nontraditional gender roles and the sexual experiences of heterosexual college students.Sex Roles 29: 645–669.
Lottes, I. L., and Weinberg, M. (1995). Sexual coercion among university students: A comparison of the United States and Sweden. Unpublished manuscript.
McCormick, N. B. (1979). Come-ons and put-offs: Unmarried students strategies for having and avoiding sexual intercourse.Psychol. Women Quart. 4: 194–211.
Moen, P., and Forest, K. B. (1990). Working parents, workplace supports and well-being: The Swedish experience.Soc. Psychol. Quart. 53: 117–131.
Mott, F. L., and Haurin, J. (1988). Linkages between sexual activity and alcohol and drug use among American adolescents.Fam. Plann. Perspect. 20: 128–136.
Muehlenhard, C. L., and Cook, S. W. (1988). Men's self-reports of unwanted sexual activity.J. Sex Res. 24: 58–72.
O'Kelly, C. E., and Carney, L. S. (1986).Women and Men in Society, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
Person, E. S. (1980). Sexuality as the mainstay of identity: Psychoanalytic perspectives.Signs 5: 605–630.
Phillips, D. E., and Gromko, M. H. (1985). Sex differences in sexual activity: Reality or illusion.J. Sex Res. 21: 437–443.
Popenoe, D. (1987). Beyond the nuclear family: A statistical portrait of the changing family in Sweden.J. Marr. Fam. 49: 173–183.
Popenoe, D. (1988).Disturbing the Nest: Family Change and Decline in Modern Societies, Aldine De Gruyter, New York.
Qvarfort, A. M., McCrea, J., and Kolenda, P. (1988). Sweden's national policy on equality between men and women. In Kolenda, P. (ed.),Cultural Construction of Women, Sheffield, Salem, WI.
Reinisch, J. M., Sanders, S. A., Hill, C. A., and Ziemba-Davis, M. (1992). High-risk sexual behavior among heterosexual undergraduates at a midwestern university.Fam. Plann. Perspect. 24: 116–121.
Reiss, I. L. (1967).The Social Context of Premarital Sexual Permissiveness, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Reiss, I. L. (1980). Sexual customs and gender roles in Sweden and America: An analysis and interpretation. In Lopata, H. (ed.),Research on the Interweave of Social Roles: Women and Men, JAI, Greenwich, CT.
Reiss, I. L. (1981). Some observations on ideology and sexuality in America.J. Marr. Fam. 43: 271–283.
Reiss, I. L. (1983). Sexuality: A research and theory perspective. In Houston, P. (ed.),Sexuality and the Family Life Span, University of Iowa Press, Iowa City.
Reiss, I. L. (1986).Journey into Sexuality, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Reiss, I. L. (1990).An End to Shame: Shaping Our Next Sexual Revolution, Prometheus, Buffalo, NY.
Roche, J. P. (1986). Premarital sex: Attitudes and behavior by dating stage.Adolescence 21: 107–121.
Schmidt, W. E. (1993). Sweden redefines sexual revolution. In Wren, C. S., and Ethridge, W. T. (eds.),Themes of the Times, Human Sexuality, Prentice-Hall and the New York Times, New York.
Schwartz, I. M. (1993). Affective reactions of American and Swedish women to their first premarital coitus: A cross-cultural comparison.J. Sex Res. 39: 18–26.
Sherwin, R., and Corbett, S. (1985). Campus sexual noms and dating relationships: A trend and analysis.J. Sex Res. 21: 258–274.
Smith, T. W. (1990). The polls—A report: The sexual revolution.Public Opinion Quart. 54: 415–435.
Sundet, J. M., Magnus, P., Kvalem, I. L., Samuelsen, S. O., and Bakketeig, L. S. (1992). Secular trends and sociodemographic regularities of coital debut age in Norway.Arch. Sex. Behav. 21: 241–252.
Sundstrom-Feigenberg, K. (1988). Reproductive health and reproductive freedom: Maternal health care and family planning in the Swedish health system.Women Health 13: 35–55.
Trost, J. (1985). Swedish solutions.Society 22: 44–48.
Wade, C., and Cirese, S. (1991).Human Sexuality, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego, CA.
Wilson, S. M., and Medora, N. P. (1990). Gender comparisons of college students' attitudes toward sexual behavior.Adolescence 25: 615–627.
Zetterberg, H. L. (1969).Om sexuallivet i Sverige [On Sexual Life in Sweden], Sweden Statens Offentiliga Utyredningar, Stockholm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research reported here was supported in part with a grant from the Foundation for the Scientific Study of Sexuality.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weinberg, M.S., Lottes, I.L. & Shaver, F.M. Swedish or American heterosexual college youth: Who is more permissive?. Arch Sex Behav 24, 409–437 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541856
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541856