Skip to main content
Log in

Gender differences in memory for a sexual story

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present research extended previous work that identified gender differences in memory for a sexual text. That work identified a memory bias for the sexes in recognition memory, whereas we found gender differences in errors in recall memory. Recall memory is particularly important because it provides the opportunity for the individual to construct memory. This provides the opportunity for distortion to occur and allows the individual to make errors. The prediction that men would incorrectly recall more material of an erotic nature was supported. The prediction that women would incorrectly recall material that was romantic in nature was not confirmed. In a recognition task both genders endorsed more false positives of a sexual nature than a romantic nature. Using findings from research on memory for written text, predictions concerning the effects of importance, perspective, and typicality were made. Those predictions were not confirmed. A discussion of possible explanations for the various findings is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alba, J. W., and Hasher, L. (1983). Is memory schematic?Psychol. Bull. 93: 203–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., and Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse.Am. Educ. Res. J. 14: 367–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beggs, V. E., Calhoun, K. S., and Wolchik, S. A. (1987). Sexual anxiety and female sexual arousal: A comparison of arousal during sexual anxiety stimuli and sexual pleasure stimuli.Arch. Sex. Behav. 16: 311–319.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1968a). Heterosexual behavior assessment - I. Males.Behav. Res. Ther. 6: 21–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1968b). Heterosexual behavior assessment - II. Females.Behav. Res. Ther. 6: 27–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., and Johnson, M. K. (1973). Consideration of some problems of comprehension. In Chase, W. G. (ed.),Visual Information Processing Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castille, C. O., and Geer, J. H. (1989, August). Is sex in the eye of the beholder? Poster presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans.

  • Edwards, A. L. (1958).Statistical Analysis Rinehart, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. A. (1983). Gender, gender role identification, and response to erotica. In Aligeier, E. R., and McCormick, N. B. (eds.),Changing Boundaries: Gender Roles and Sexual Behavior Mayfield, Palo Alto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H., and Broussard, D. B. (1990). Scaling sexual behavior and arousal: Consistency and sex differences.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58: 664–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H., and McGlone, M. (1990). Sex differences in memory for erotica.Cognit. Emot. 4: 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, J. R. (1977). A psychophysiological exploration of sexual arousal patterns in females and males.Psychophysiology 14: 266–274.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Julien, E., and Over, R. (1988). Male sexual arousal across five modes of erotic stimulation.Arch. Sex. Behav. 17: 131–143.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., and van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychol. Rev. 85: 363–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. L., and Cross, H. G. (1971). Sex guilt and premarital sexual experience of college students.J. Consult. Clin Psychol. 36: 27–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Omanson, R. C. (1982). An analysis of narratives: Identifying central, supportive and distracting content.Discourse Proc. 5: 145–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichert, J. W., and Anderson, R. C. (1977). Taking different perspectives on a story.J. Educ. Psychol. 69: 309–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G., Sigusch, V., and Schafer, S. (1973). Responses to reading erotic stories: Male-female differences.Arch. Sex. Behav. 2: 181–199.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (1986).Attorney General's Commission on Pornography Final Report, Vols. 1 and 2, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. (Meese Commission)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winick, C. (1970). Some observations of patrons of adult theaters and bookstores.Technical Reports of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, Vol. 4, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, J. (1976).The Social Psychology of Sex. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study is based on portions of a Doctoral Dissertation submitted by J. R. Kirsch to Louisiana State University—Baton Rouge in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctoral Degree.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirsch-Rosenkrantz, J., Geer, J.H. Gender differences in memory for a sexual story. Arch Sex Behav 20, 295–305 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541848

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541848

Key words

Navigation