Abstract
Twenty-four men were exposed to erotic material of matched content across five sessions, each separated by 24 hours or more. The stimulation within a session consisted of eight 12-minute episodes depicting heterosexual activities. Both penile circumference and subjective sexual arousal varied significantly across the segments within a session. However, neither response measure showed habituation across sessions. Participation in the study did not modify the extralaboratory sexual behaviors of subjects. These results are discussed with reference to stimulus, subject, context, and measurement variables that potentially influence the extent to which repeated exposure to erotic material affects sexual arousal within the laboratory and sexual activity outside the laboratory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amoroso, D. M., Brown, M. Preusse, M., Ware, E. E., and Pilkey, D. W. (1970). An investigation of behavioral, psychological and physiological reactions to pornographic stimuli. InTechnical Reports of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, Vol. 8. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Brancroft, J. H., and Mathews, A. (1971). Autonomic correlates of penile erection.J. Psychosom. Res. 15: 159–167.
Bancroft, J. H., Jones, H. G., and Pullan, B. R. (1966) A simple transducer for measuring penile erection, with comments on its use in the treatment of sexual disorders.Behav. Res. Ther. 4: 239–241.
Bentler, P. M. (1968). Heterosexual behavior assessment—I. Males.Behav. Res. Ther. 6: 21–25.
Brown, M., Amoroso, D. M., Ware, E. E., Pruesse, M., and Pilkey, D. W. (1973). Factors affecting viewing time of pornography.J. Soc. Psychol. 90: 125–135.
Byrne, D., and Lamberth, J. (1970). The effect of erotic stimuli on sex arousal evaluative responses and subsequent behavior. InTechnical Reports of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, Vol. 8. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Davis, K. E., and Braught, G. N. (1970). Reactions to viewing films of erotically realistic heterosexual behavior. InTechnical Reports of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, Vol. 8. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Drummond, P., White, R., and Ashton, R. (1978). Imagery vividness affects habituation rate.Psychophysiology 15: 193–195.
Farkas, G. M., Sine, L. F., and Evans, I. M. (1979). The effects of distraction, performance demand, stimulus explicitness and personality on objective and subjective measures of male sexual arousal.Behav. Res. Ther. 17: 25–32.
Freund, K., Langevin, R., and Zajac, Y. (1974). A note on the erotic arousal value of moving and stationary human forms.Behav. Res. Ther. 12: 117–119.
Geer, J. H. and Fuhr, R. (1976). Cognitive factors in sexual arousal: The role of distraction.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 44: 238–243.
Hare, R. D., Wood, K., Britain, S., and Shadman, J. (1970). Autonomic responses to affective visual stimulations.Psychophysiology 7: 408–417.
Heiman, J. (1977). A psychophysiological exploration of sexual arousal patterns in females and males.Psychophysiology 14: 266–274.
Herman, S. H., Barlow, D. H., and Agras, W. S. (1974). An experimental analysis of classical conditioning as a method of increasing heterosexual arousal in homosexuals.Behav. Ther. 5: 33–47.
Howard, J. L., Reifler, C. B., and Liptzin, M. B. (1970). Effects of exposure to pornography. InTechnical Reports of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornograph, Vol. 8. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Julien, E., and Over, R. (1981). Male sexual arousal and the law of initial value.Psychophysiology 18: 709–711.
Morrish, R. B. (1973). Patterns of autonomic activation and their individual differences across appetitive and aversive stimulus situations. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Queensland University.
Mosher, D. L. (1970). Psychological reactions to pornographic films. InTechnical Reports of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, Vol. 8, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Riefler, C. B., Howard, J., Lipton, M. A., Liptzin, M. B., and Widmann, D. E. (1971). Pornography: An experimental study of effects.Amer. J. Psychiat. 128: 575–582.
Report of the Effects Panel to the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. (1970). InThe Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography, Part II. The Impact of Erotica. Bantam, New York.
Rosen, R. (1973). Suppression of penile tumescence by instrumental conditioning.Psychosom. Med. 35: 509–514.
Rosen, R. C., and Keefe, F. J. (1975). The measurement of human penile tumescence.Psychophysiology 15: 366–376.
Rubin, H. B., and Henson, D. E. (1976). Effects of alcohol on male sexual responding.Psychopharmacology 47: 123–134.
Schmidt, G. (1975). Male-female differences in sexual arousal and behavior during and after exposure to sexually explicit stimuli.Arch. Sex. Behav. 4: 353–365.
Schmidt, G., and Sigusch, V. (1970). Sex differences in responses to psychosexual stimulation by films and slides.J. Sex Res. 6: 268–283.
Schmidt, G., Sigusch, V., and Meyberg, U. (1969). Psychosexual stimulation in men: Emotional reactions, change of sex behavior and measures of conservative attitudes.J. Sex. Res. 5: 199–217.
Schmidt, G., Sigusch, V., and Schafer, S. (1973). Responses to reading erotic stories. Malefemale differences.Arch. Sex. Behav. 2: 181–199.
Sigusch, V., Schmidt, G., Reinfeld, A., and Wiedemann-Sutor, I. (1970). Psychosexual stimulation: Sex differences.J. Sex Res. 6: 10–24.
Wishnoff, R. (1978). Modeling effects of explicit and nonexplicit sexual stimuli on sexual anxiety and behavior of women.Arch. Sex. Behav. 7: 455–461.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Julien, E., Over, R. Male sexual arousal with repeated exposure to erotic stimuli. Arch Sex Behav 13, 211–222 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541648
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541648