A comparison of male and female patterns of sexual arousal

Abstract

The structural patterns of sexual arousal are examined for eight male and eight female heterosexuals. Comparisons are made in terms of physiological and subjective arousal. The results indicate (1) that males and females differ in both the direction and magnitude of their arousal response to a variety of erotic stimuli and (2) that there is a stronger correspondence between subjective and physiological measures of sexual arousal for males than for females. A social acceptability and/or unacceptability theory is suggested to account for similarities and differences between the male and female structural patterns of arousal. Several methods of assessing subjective arousal are included to represent those most frequently used in clinical research settings. It is demonstrated that each of the subjective measures discriminates between erotic conditions and that the information provided by each of the measures are comparable.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Barlow, D. H. (1977). Assessment of sexual behavior. In Ciminero, A., Calhoun, K., and Adams, H. (eds.),Handbook of Behavioral Assessment Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barlow, D. H., Becker, R., Leitenberg, H., and Agras, W. S. (1970). A mechanical strain gauge for recording penile circumference change.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 6: 355–367.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barr, R., and Blaszcyznski, A. (1976). Autonomic responses of transsexual and homosexual males to erotic film sequences.Arch. Sex. Behav. 5: 211–222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barr, R., Raphael, B., and Hennessey, N. (1974). Apparent heterosexuality in two male patients requesting change-of-sex operations.Arch. Sex. Behav. 3: 325–330.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 42: 155–162.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bentler, P. M. (1968a). Heterosexual behavior assessment—I. Males.Behav. Res. Ther. (1968b). 6= 21–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bentler, P. M. (1968b). Heterosexual behavior assessment—II. Females.Behav. Res. Ther. 6: 27–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blumstein, P. W., and Schwartz, P. (1976). Bisexuality in women.Arch. Sex. Behav. 5: 171–181.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Conrad, S., and Wincze, J. (1976). Orgasmic reconditioning: A controlled study of its effects upon the sexual arousal and behavior of adult male homosexuals.Behav. Ther. 7: 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Freund, K. (1957). Diagnostika homosexuality umuzu.Cesk. Psychiat. 53: 382–393.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gagnon, J. H., and Simon, W. (1973).Sexual Conduct. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Geer, J., Morokoff, P., and Greenwood, P. (1974). Sexual arousal in women: The development of a measurement device for vaginal blood volume.Arch. Sex. Behav. 3: 559–564.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heiman, J. (1975). Use of the vaginal photophythesmograph as a diagnostic and treatment device in female sexual dysfunction. Paper delivered at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago.

  14. Heiman, J. R. (1978). A psychosiological exploration of sexual arousal patterns in females and males.Psychophysiology 14: 266–274.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Henson, D., Rubin, H., Henson, C., and Williams, J. (1977). Temperature change of the labia minora as an objective measure of female eroticism.J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiat. 4: 401–410.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hoon, E., and Hoon, P. Sexual arousability: Differences between males and females on a self-report measure. Unpublished manuscript.

  17. Hoon, E. F., Hoon, P. W., and Wincze, J. P. (1976). An inventory for the measurement of female sexual arousability: The SAI.Arch. Sex. Behav. 5: 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hoon, P., Wincze, J., and Hoon, E. (1976). Physiological assessment of sexual arousal in women.Psychophysiology 11: 196–204.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Izard, C., and Caplan, S. (1974). Sex differences in emotional responses to erotic literature.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 42: 468.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Katchadourian, H. A., and Martin, J. A. (1979). Analyses of human sexual behavior. In Katchadourian, H. A. (ed.),Human Sexuality: A Comparative and Developmental Perspective. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., and Martin, C. (1948).Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., Martin, C., and Gebhard, P. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mavissakalian, M., Blanchard, E., Abel, G., and Barlow, D. (1975). Responses to complex erotic stimuli in homosexual and heterosexual males.Brit. J. Psychiat. 126: 252–257.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McConaghy, H. (1969). Subjective and penile phethysmographic responses following aversion therapy for homosexual impulses.Brit. J. Psychit. 115: 723–730.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Morin, S. F., and Garfinkle, E. M. (1978). Male homophobia.J. Soc. Issues 34: 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mosher, D. L., and Abramson, P. R. (1977). Subjective sexual arousal to films of masturbation.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 45: 796–807.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mosher, D. L., and O'Grady, K. E. (1979). Homosexual threat, negative attitudes toward masturbation, sex guilt, and males' sexual and affective reactions to explicit sexual films.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 47: 860–873.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sanford, D. A. (1974). Patterns of sexual arousal in heterosexual males.J. Sex. Res. 10: 150–155.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmidt, G. (1975). Male-female differences in sexual arousal and behavior during and after exposure to sexually explicit stimuli.Arch. Sex. Behav. 4: 353–365.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sigusch, V., Schmidt, G., Reinfeld, A., and Widemann-Sutor, I. (1970). Psychosexual stimulation: Sex differences.J. Sex Res. 6: 10–24.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sintchak, G., and Geer, J. A. (1975). A vaginal phethysmograph system.Psychophysiology 12: 113–115.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Steele, D. G., and Walker, C. E. (1974). Male and female differences in reaction to erotic stimuli as related to sexual adjustment.Arch. Sex. Behav. 3: 459–470.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stoller, R. J. (1976). Sexual excitement.Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 33: 899–909.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wincze, J. P., Hoon, E. F., and Hoon, P. W. (1976). Physiological responsivity of normal and dysfunctional women during erotic stimulus exposure.J. Psychosom. Res. 20: 445–451.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wincze, J., Hoon, P., and Hoon, E. (1977). Sexual arousal in women: A comparsion of cognitive and physiological responses by continuous measurement.Arch. Sex. Behav. 6: 121–133.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. Wincze Ph.D..

Additional information

Research was funded by VA Grant No. 041-34-7119 (1977).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steinman, D.L., Wincze, J.P., Sakheim et al. A comparison of male and female patterns of sexual arousal. Arch Sex Behav 10, 529–547 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541588

Download citation

Key words

  • sexual arousal
  • social acceptability
  • social unacceptability
  • subjective measures
  • sex differences