Skip to main content
Log in

Is there a national standard with respect to attitudes toward sexually explicit media material?

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surveys in 10 states conducted with probability samples of adults (N =4621) between 1976 and 1985 found that a statistically significant majority of the respondents in each state indicated acceptance of sexually explicit content in mass media. In each state, respondents felt that (i) standards have changed so that such material has become more acceptable; (ii) adults have the right to obtain such materials; and (iii) it is all right for adults to obtain and see materials containing exposure of the genitalia and every kind of sexual activity. Some factors contributing to what appears to be an emerging national consensus of acceptance are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson, H. I., Cohen, R., Heaton, E., and Suder, C. (1971). Public attitudes toward and experience with erotic materials. InCommission on Obscenity and Pornography, Technical Report, Vol. 6., U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp. 139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attorney General. (1986).Final Report of the Commission on Pornography U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Y. M., Fienberg, S. E., and Holland, P. W. (1975).Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Charting the adult video market.” (1989).Adult Video News 1989 Buyer's Guide, pp. 6–7.

  • Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. (1971).Final Report Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A., and Smith, T. W. (1991).The General Social Survey 1972–1991: Cumulative Code Book National Opinion Research Center, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, M., and Dannemiller, M. A. (1989). Pornography and community standards in Hawaii: Comparisons with other states.Arch. Sex. Behav. 18: 475–495.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, A. (1989).Pornography: Men Possessing Women Dutton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahringer, H. P. (1975). Appellants reply briefin re People of the State of New York v. J. Buckley and A. Goldstein, State Court of Appeals, pp. 1–18.

  • Garbus, M. (1990). Thornburgh's morality brigade.New York Times, April 28 p. 34.

  • Gest, T. (1989). The drive to make America porn-free,Newsweek, February 6, p. 26.

  • Glenn, N. D., and Simmons, J. L. (1967). Are regional culture differences diminishing,P. O. Q. 31: 176–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J. (1992). Topless bars want your husband.Redbook 179(5): 118–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W. V., and Snyder, T. D. (1986).Digest of Education Statistics 1985–1986 U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrman, M. S., and Bordner, D. C. (1983). Attitudes toward pornography in a southern community,Criminology, 349–374.

  • Jackson, G., Masnick, G., Bolton, R., Bartlett, S., and Pitkin, J. (1981).Regional Diversity: Growth in the United States 1960–1990 Auburn House, Boston, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller v. California (1973). 413 U.S. 153.

  • Mackinnon, C. A. (1989).Toward A Feminist Theory of the State Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York v. Ferber. (1982). 102 S. Ct. 3357, n. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobile, P. (ed.), (1970).The New Eroticism: Theories, Vogues, and Canons Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obscenity Research Project. (1977). An empirical inquiry into the effects ofMiller v. California on the control of obscenity.New York Univ. Law R. 52: 810–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, B., Anderson, H., Bradley, M., Goetting, P., and Shriver, P. (1980).Churches and Church Membership in the United States Glenmary Research Center, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, H. T. (1977).The Analysis of Cross-Classifications Free Press, Riverside, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. E. (1991). What is obscene? Social science and the contemporary community standard test of obscenity.Int. J. Law Psychiat. 14: 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seldin, C. (1984). Vote rejecting cable measure by a 3—2 ratio.Salt Lake Tribune, November 7, p. 1.

  • Straus, M. A. (1985). The validity of U.S. States as units for sociological research. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association.

  • Winick, C. (1977). From deviant to normative: Changes in the social acceptability of sexually explicit material. In Sagarin, E. (ed.),Deviance and Social Change Sage, Beverly Hills. pp. 219–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1985). The validity of U.S. States as units for sociological research. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association.

  • Winick, C. (1977). From deviant to normative: Changes in the social acceptability of sexually explicit material. In Sagarin, E. (ed.),Deviance and Social Change Sage, Beverly Hills. pp. 219–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, B., and Armstrong, S. (1979).The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court Simon and Schuster, New York, pp. 192–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevin, D. (1992). Sex in entertainment: How far can it go?US August, pp. 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winick, C., Evans, J.T. Is there a national standard with respect to attitudes toward sexually explicit media material?. Arch Sex Behav 23, 405–419 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541406

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541406

Key words

Navigation