Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 151–157 | Cite as

Three clinically discrete categories of fetishistic transvestism

  • Neil Buhrich
  • Neil McConaghy
Article

Abstract

In a previous article the authors established that subjects who identified themselves as transvestites could be categorized into two clinically discrete groups — a nuclear transvestite group who were satisfied with cross-dressing and a marginal transvestite group who, in addition to cross-dressing, desired feminization by hormones or surgical intervention. Both groups had shown fetishistic arousal to cross-dressing. In the present study subjects in the marginal transvestite group were compared with subjects who had shown fetishistic arousal but who identified themselves as transsexuals by attending a Transsexual Clinic seeking a full sex-change operation. They were termed fetishistic transsexuals. Significantly more of the self-identified transsexuals in comparison to the marginal transvestites showed homosexual interest, felt like a woman when nude, and had lived for the previous 6 months continuously as a woman. These differences are consistent with the self-identification of the subjects as transsexuals or transvestites and justify the differentiation of two clinical syndromes: marginal transvestism and fetishistic transsexualism. There appear to be three clinically discrete types of fetishistic cross-dressing: nuclear transvestism, marginal transvestism, and fetishistic transsexualism.

Key words

transvestism fetishism transsexualism cross-dressing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, J. (1969). Transsexualism — problems in treatment.Am. J. Psychother. 125: 1412–1417.Google Scholar
  2. Bancroft, J. (1972). The relationship between gender identity and sexual behaviour: some clinical aspects. In Ounsted, C., and Taylor, D. C. (eds.),Gender Differences: Their Ontogeny and Significance Churchill Livingstone, London.Google Scholar
  3. Barr, R. F., Raphael, B., and Hennessey, N. (1974). Apparent heterosexuality in two male patients requesting change of sex operation.Arch. Sex. Behav. 3: 325–331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin, H. (1966).The Transsexual Phenomenon Julian Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Benjamin, H. (1967). Transvestism and transsexualism in the male and female.J. Sex Res. 3: 107–127.Google Scholar
  6. Buhrich, N., and McConaghy, N., (1977a). Can fetishism occur in transsexuals?Arch. Sex. Behav. 6: 223–235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Buhrich, N., and McConaghy, N. (1977b). The discrete syndromes of transvestism and transsexualism.Arch. Sex. Behav. 6: 483–495.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Buhrich, N., and McConaghy, N. (1978). Two clinically discrete syndromes of transsexualism.Br. J. Psychiat. 133: 73–76.Google Scholar
  9. Hoenig, J., and Kenna, J. (1974). The prevalence of transsexualism in England and Wales.Br. J. Psychiat. 124: 181–190.Google Scholar
  10. McConaghy, N. (1967). Penile volume change to moving pictures of male and female nudes in heterosexual and homosexual subjects.Behav. Res. Ther. 5: 43–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Meyer, J. K. (1974). Clinical variants among applicants for sex reassignment.Arch. Sex. Behav. 3: 327–358.Google Scholar
  12. Stoller, R. J. (1971). The term transvestism.Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 24: 230–237.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neil Buhrich
    • 1
  • Neil McConaghy
    • 2
  1. 1.New South Wales Institute of PsychiatryLeichhardtAustralia
  2. 2.The Prince Henry HospitalUniversity of New South WalesLittle BayAustralia

Personalised recommendations