Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Love, sex, permissiveness, and abortion: A test of alternative models

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alternative models of premarital abortion permissiveness (PAP) are tested with a two-state sample of single college women. The first model proposes that number of times in love (Love) leads to coitus (Sex) and that coitus increases premarital sexual permissiveness (PSP), which in turn leads to greater acceptance of abortion (PAP). The second posits a causal path from Love to PSP to Sex to PAP. The data appear to be consistent with a revised third model. The paths between Love and PAP and between Love and PSP are negligible, indicating that the effects of Love on PSP and PAP are mediated by Sex. The revised model suggests that as number of times in love increases so does coital experience and that coitus has both a direct effect on PAP and an indirect effect through PSP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, D. W. (1967). An abortion clinic ethnography.Soc. Probl. 14: 293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardis, P. D. (1972a). Abortion and public opinion: A research note.J. Marriage Family 34: 111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardis, P. D. (1972b). A technique for the measurement of attitudes toward abortion.Int. J. Sociol. Family 2: 98–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. (1971). Abortion and public opinion: The 1960–1970 decade.Science 171: 540–549.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, R. P. (1970). Path analysis and ordinal data.Am. J. Sociol. 75: 461–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briedis, C. (1975). Marginal deviants: Teenage girls experience community response to premarital sex and pregnancy.Soc. Probl. 22: 480–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, W. R. (1973). Premarital sexual attitudes and behavior. InTheory Construction and the Sociology of the Family Wiley, New York, Chap. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, K. L., and Long, R. (1971). Premarital sexual behavior in the sixties.J. Marriage Family 33: 36–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, H. T. (1969). Normative theory derived from cross-cultural family research.J. Marriage Family 31: 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, R. R. (1972). Premarital sexual intercourse: A substantive test of the contingent consistency model.J. Marriage Family 34: 273–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotson, L. E., and Summers, G. F. (1970). Elaboration of Guttman Scaling techniques. In Summers, G. F. (ed.),Attitude Measurement Rand McNally, Chicago, pp. 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D. (1966). Path analysis: Sociological examples.Am. J. Sociol. 72: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrmann, W. (1959).Premarital Dating Behavior Holt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finner, S. L., and Gamache, J. D. (1969). The relation between religious commitment and attitudes toward induced abortion.Sociol. Anal. 30: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G. (1974). Public closely divided on abortion despite Supreme Court ruling.Grand Forks Herald Grand Forks, North Dakota, April 7, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1947). The Cornell technique for scale and intensity analysis.Educ. Psychol. Meas. 7: 247–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankins, F. (1937). German policies for increasing births.Am. J. Sociol. 42: 630–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). Abortion — Or compulsory pregnancy?J. Marriage Family 30: 246–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. E., Bennett, W. H., and Globetti, G. (1969). Attitudes of rural youth toward premarital sexual permissiveness.J. Marriage Family 31: 783–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R. (1969). Problems in path analysis and causal inference. In Borgatta, E. F. (ed.),Sociological Methodology 1969 Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 38–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heltsley, M. E., and Broderick, C. B. (1969). Religiosity and premarital sexual permissiveness: Reexamination of Reiss's traditionalism proposition.J. Marriage Family 31: 441–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J. (ed.) (1973). Changing women in a changing society.Am. J. Sociol. 78: special issue devoted to research on women.

  • Himes, J. S. (1964). Some reaction to a hypothetical premarital pregnancy by 100 Negro college women.J. Marriage Family 26: 344–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, K. C. (1969). Principles of path analysis. In Borgatta, E. F. (ed.),Sociological Methodology 1969 Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 3–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maranell, G. M., Dodder, R. A., and Mitchell, D. F. (1970). Social class and premarital sexual permissiveness: A subsequent test.J. Marriage Family 32: 85–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. W. (1970). College students' attitudes toward abortion.Family Coordinator 19: 247–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middendorp, C. P., Brinkman, W., and Koomen, W. (1970). Determinants of premarital sexual permissiveness: A secondary analysis.J. Marriage Family 32: 369–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, N. H., Bent, D. H., and Hull, C. H. (1970).Statistical Package for the Social Sciences McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygreen, G. T. (1971). Interactive path analysis.Am. Sociologist 6: 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, I. L. (1960).Premarital Sexual Standards in America Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, I. L. (1964a). Premarital sexual permissiveness among Negroes and Whites.Am. Sociol. Rev. 29: 688–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, I. L. (1964b). The scaling of premarital sexual permissiveness.J. Marriage Family 26: 188–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, I. L. (1965). Social class and premarital sexual permissiveness: A re-examination.Am. Sociol. Rev. 30: 747–756.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, I. L. (1967a). Some comments on premarital sexual permissiveness.Am. J. Sociol. 72: 558–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, I. L. (1967b).The Social Context of Premarital Sexual Permissiveness Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, I. L. (1970). Premarital sex as deviant behavior: An application of current approaches to deviance.Am. Sociol. Rev. 35: 78–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, E. A., and Gibbons, D. C. (1966). Social reactions to “crimes without victims.”Soc. Probl. 13: 400–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, A. S. (1966). Abortion laws and their victims.Transaction 3: 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruppel, H. J., Jr. (1970). Religiosity and premarital sexual permissiveness: A response to the Reiss-Heltsley and Broderick debate.J. Marriage Family 32: 647–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarvis, B., and Rodman, H. (1973).The Abortion Controversy Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schur, E. M. (1955). Abortion and the social system.Soc. Probl. 3: 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. B. (1972). Neighborhood context and college plans: An ordinal path analysis.Soc. Forces 51: 199–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tien, H. Y. (1963). Induced abortion and population control in Mainland China.Marriage Family Living 25: 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, W. S. (1958).Theory and Methods of Scaling Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoff, C. F., Moore, E. C., and Ryder, N. B. (1969). The structure of attitudes toward abortion.Milbank Mem. Fund Quart. 47: 11–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of California, Riverside, California, USA

    Alfred M. Mirandé Ph.D.

  2. Department of Sociology, Mary Baldwin College, Staunton, Virginia, USA

    Elizabeth L. Hammer M.S.

Authors
  1. Alfred M. Mirandé Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth L. Hammer M.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mirandé, A.M., Hammer, E.L. Love, sex, permissiveness, and abortion: A test of alternative models. Arch Sex Behav 5, 553–566 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541219

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541219

Key words

Search

Navigation