Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Self-report instruments concerning personality and subjective responses to sexual orgasm were filled out by 281 female university undergraduates. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to evaluate the dimensionality of women's subjective responsiveness to orgasm. The results did not support the concept of a unidimensional orgasm process; separate coital and masturbatory factors of orgasmic experience were obtained. Highly internally consistent scales were developed to assess the two factors, and both scales were found to be significantly correlated with indices of extraversion, attitudes toward masturbation, and sexual experience. A path-analytic model was developed which is consistent with the hypothesis that heterosexual and monosexual behaviors act as mediators between extraversion, neuroticism, and attitudes toward masturbation, on the one hand, and subjective coital or masturbatory orgasmic responsiveness, on the other. It appears that attitudes toward masturbation may also have a direct influence on masturbatory responsiveness. Various therapeutic implications of the path model are described. Replications and extensions of the study with older, more experienced populations are necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, P. R. (1977). Ethical requirements for research on human sexual behavior: From the perspective of participating subjects.J. Soc. Iss. 33: 184–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, P. R., and Mosher, D. L. (1975). Development of a measure of negative attitudes toward masturbation.J. Consult. Psychol. 40: 485–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1967). A scale for monosexual behavior. Mimeograph.

  • Bentler, P. M. (1968). Heterosexual behavior assessment. II. Females.Behav. Res. Ther. 6: 27–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1976). Multistructure statistical model applied to factor analysis.Mult. Behav. Res. 11: 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1978). The interdependence of theory, methodology, and empirical data: Causal modeling as an approach to construct validation. In Kandel, D. B. (ed.),Longitudinal Research on Drug Use: Empirical Findings and Methodological Issues Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., and Huba, G. J. (1979). Simple minitheories of love.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 37: 124–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunzl, M., and Mullen, S. (1974). A self report investigation of two types of myotonic response during sexual orgasm.J. Sex Res. 10: 10–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, C. A. (1976). New data about female sexual response.J. Sex. Mar. Ther. 2: 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1976).Sex and Personality University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964).The Eysenck Personality Inventory University of London Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. (1973).The Female Orgasm Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1938). Three contributions to the theory of sex. In Brill, A. A. (ed.),The Basic Writings of Sigmund Freud Modern Library, New York, pp. 553–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom, D. (1976).LISREL III: Users Guide National Educational Resources, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H. S. (1974).The New Sex Therapy Brunner/Mazel, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. H., and Johnson, V. E. (1966).Human Sexual Response Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1968).Personality and Assessment Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. (1961). Frigidity in women — Panel report.J. Am. Psychoan. Assoc. 9: 571–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertiello, R. C. (1970). The “clitoral vs. vaginal orgasm” controversy and some of its ramifications.J. Sex Res. 6: 307–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, N. (1970). The primacy of genitality in the light of Dego psychology.J. Am. Psychoan. Assoc. 18: 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J., and Singer, I. (1972). Types of female orgasm.J. Sex Res. 8: 255–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. A., and Bentler, P. M. (1978). A statistical lower bound to population reliability.Psychol. Bull. 85: 1323–1326.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This investigation was supported in part by a Research Scientist Development Award (KO2-DA00017) and a research grant (DA01070) from the U.S. Public Health Service.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bentler, P.M., Peeler, W.H. Models of female orgasm. Arch Sex Behav 8, 405–423 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541197

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541197

Key words

Navigation