Skip to main content
Log in

Social interaction and stereotypic responses to homosexuals

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work focuses on the variations in societal responses perceived by male homosexuals in different group settings of interaction and on the relationship of these responses to their social status and related behavioral characteristics. Based on the analysis of data collected from a sampling of 148 male homosexuals in and around a large midwestern city, it is concluded that (1) stereotypic responses are more likely to occur under the interactional prescripts characteristic of secondary groups due to the impersonal and almost “one-way” interaction which characterizes them and (2) lower-class homosexuals are more likely to perceive stereotypic responses because of their closer approximation to the stereotypic image of the homosexual. It is also suggested that exhibiting behavior which closely approximates the stereotype may be a manifestation of the lowerclass homosexual's desire to be clearly identified with the homosexual community and to conform to the sex role stereotypic expectations of the lower classes. Such behavior may provide for a meaningful self-definition and opportunity for upward mobility unattainable in the larger society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blalock, H. M. (1960).Social Statistics McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1966). Sociological implications of the thought of George Herbert Mead.Am. J. Sociol. 71: 535–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969).Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonjean, C. M., Hill, R., and McLemore, S. (1967).Sociological Measurement Chandler, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, W. (1967).Sociology and Modern Systems Theory Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1902).Human Nature and the Social Order Scribner's, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1909).Social Organization Scribner's, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika 16: 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohrenwend, B. P., and Chin-Shong, E. (1967). Social status and attitudes toward psychological disorder: The problem of tolerance of deviance.Am. Sociol. Rev. 32: 417–433.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, T., and Dean, C. (1968). Common misinterpretations of significance levels in sociological journals.Am. Sociologist 3: 45–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, R. A. (1971). Class linkages of legal treatment of homosexuals.Criminology 9: 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, J. J.,et al. (1965–1966). The consenting adult homosexual and the law.UCLA Law Rev. 13: 686–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. (1964). Awareness contexts and social interaction.Am. Sociol. Rev. 29: 669–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963).Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, D. (1969). Statistical tests and substantive significance.Am. Sociologist 4: 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, H. M. (1971). Homosexuals: Deviant or minority group? In Sagarin, E. (ed.),The Other Minorities Ginn, Waltham, Mass., pp. 65–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. (1950).The Human Group Harcourt, Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, L. (1970).Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitsuse, J. (1962). Societal reaction to deviant behavior: Problems of theory and method.Soc. Problems 9: 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leznoff, M., and Westley, W. (1965). The homosexual community.Soc. Problems 3: 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechanic, D. (1962). Some factors in identifying and defining mental illness.Ment. Hyg. 46: 66–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrione, T. J. (1971). The omission of the “i”: A clue to understanding the link between social action theory and symbolic interactionism. Paper presented at the 1971 Annual Meeting of the Pacific Sociological Society.

  • Myerhoff, H. L., and Myerhoff, B. G. (1964). Field observation of middle class gangs.Soc. Forces 42: 328–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubington, E., and Weinberg, M. S. (1968). The social deviant. Part I inDeviance: The Interactionist Perspective, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, W., and Gagnon, J. (1969). Homosexuality: The formulation of a sociological perspective. In Weltge, R. W. (ed.),The Same Sex Pilgrim Press, Philadelphia. Originally printed inJ. Health Soc. Behav. 8(3), 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strerfert, S. (1965). Communicator importance and interpersonal attitudes toward conforming and deviant group members.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2: 242–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, R. M. (1967). The screening of juvenile offenders.J. Crim. Law Criminol. Pol. Sci. 58: 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I. (1923).The Unadjusted Girl Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. (1962). Role-taking: Process versus conformity. In Rose, A.M. (ed.),Human Behavior and Social Process: An Interactionist Approach Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, M. S. (1970). Homosexual samples: Differences and similarities.J. Sex Res. 6: 312–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. J., and Weinberg, M. S. (1971).Homosexuals and the Military Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. P. (1970). Conceptions of interaction and forms of sociological explanation.Am. Sociol. Rev. 35: 697–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, R., and Campbell, D. (1969). Proof? No. Evidence? Yes. The significance of tests of significance.Am. Sociologist 4:140–143

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farrell, R.A., Morrione, T.J. Social interaction and stereotypic responses to homosexuals. Arch Sex Behav 3, 425–442 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541163

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541163

Keywords

Navigation