Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 143–159 | Cite as

Mate swapping: Perceptions, value orientations, and participation in a Midwestern community

  • Graham B. Spanier
  • Charles L. Cole


This article attempts to illuminate the understanding of swinging, or mate swapping, an increasingly common form of extramarital sexual activity. A theoretical formulation argues that swinging is a form of extramarital sexual activity which serves to define as good and acceptable a behavior that in other forms and in the past has been considered deviant or immoral. A stratified area probability sample of 579 married adults was drawn from a Midwestern community of 40,000. Areas investigated included community knowledge and perception of swinging, values of respondents with regard to participation in and acceptance of swinging, and the incidence of swinging in the community. Most respondents disapproved of mate swapping as well as other forms of extramarital sex. Over half of the respondents knew about mate swapping, although less than 7% of the sample would consider participating. Swinging was found to exist in the community, but less than 2% of the respondents had ever participated. The data analysis is descriptive and exploratory, focusing on social correlates and characteristics.

Key words

swinging extramarital mate swapping marriage intercourse 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bartell, G. D. (1971).Group Sex Wyden, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, R. (1971). Swinging — The sexual exchange of married partners.Sex. Behav. 1: 70–79.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, R., and Chaskes, J. B. (1970). Premarital sexual experience among coeds: 1958 and 1968.J. Marriage Family 32: 81–84.Google Scholar
  4. Breedlove, W. and Breedlove, J. (1964).Swap Clubs Sherborne Press, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  5. Christensen, H. T. and Gregg, C. G. (1970). Changing sex norms in America and Scandinavia.J. Marriage Family 32: 616–627.Google Scholar
  6. Cole, C. L., and Spanier, G. B. (1973). Induction into mate swapping: A review.Family Process 12: 279–290.Google Scholar
  7. Cole, C. L., and Spanier, G. B. (1974). Co-marital mate sharing and family stability.J. Sex Res. 10: 21–31.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, K. E. (1970). Sex on the campus: Is there a revolution?Med. Aspects Hum. Sexuality 4.Google Scholar
  9. Denfeld, D. and Gordon, M. (1970). The sociology of mate-swapping: Or the family that swings together clings together.J. Sex Res. 6: 85–100.Google Scholar
  10. Edmonds, V. H., Withers, G., and Dibatista, B. (1972). Adjustment, conservatism and marital conventionalization.J. Marriage Family 34: 96–103.Google Scholar
  11. Galant, M., and Galant, K. (1966).Sex Rebels Publisher's Export Co., San Diego.Google Scholar
  12. Galant, M., and Galant, K. (1967a).Mate-Swapping Syndrome Triumph Fact Books, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  13. Galant, M., and Galant, K. (1967b).Wife Swapping in Business Century Books, Cleveland.Google Scholar
  14. Galant, M., and Galant, K. (1967c).Wife Swapping: The People Publisher's Export Co., San Diego.Google Scholar
  15. Gilmartin, B. G. (1972a). Some social and personal characteristics of mate-sharing swingers. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  16. Gilmartin, B. G. (1972b). The social context of co-marital sexual behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
  17. Kaats, G. R., and Davis, K. E. (1970). The dynamics of sexual behavior of college students.J. Marriage Family 32: 390–399.Google Scholar
  18. Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., and Martin, C. (1948).Sexual Behavior in the Human Male Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  19. Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., Martin, C., and Gebhard, P. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  20. Locke, H. J., and Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity.Marriage Family Living 21: 251–255.Google Scholar
  21. Luckey, E. B., and Nass, G. D. (1969). A comparison of sexual attitudes and behavior in an international sample.J. Marriage Family 31: 364–379.Google Scholar
  22. Masters, W., and Johnson, V. (1966).Human Sexual Response. Little, Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
  23. O'Neill, G. C., and O'Neill, N. (1970). Patterns in group sexual activity.J. Sex Res. 6: 101–112.Google Scholar
  24. Paulson, C., and Paulson, R. (1972). Swinging in wedlock.Society 9: 28–37.Google Scholar
  25. Robinson, I. E., King, K., Dudley, C. J., and Clune, F. J. (1968). Change in sexual behavior and attitudes of college students.Family Coordinator 17: 119–123.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, J. R., and Smith, L. G. (1970). Co-marital sex and the sexual freedom movement.J. Sex Res. 6: 131–142.Google Scholar
  27. Sorensen, R. C. (1973).Adolescent Sexuality in Contemporary America World, Cleveland.Google Scholar
  28. Spanier, G. B., (1972). Romanticism and marital adjustment.J. Marriage Family 34: 481–487.Google Scholar
  29. Spanier, G. B. (1973a). Whose marital adjustment? A research note.Sociol. Inquiry 43: 95–96.Google Scholar
  30. Spanier, G. B. (1973b). Sexual socialization and premarital sexual behavior: An empirical investigation of the impact of formal and informal sex education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  31. Symonds, C. (1968). Pilot study in the peripheral behavior of sexual mate-swappers. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of California, Riverside.Google Scholar
  32. Symonds, C. (1971). Sexual mate-swapping and the swingers.Marriage Counseling Quart. 6: 1–12.Google Scholar
  33. Walshok, M. L. (1971). The emergence of middle-class deviant subcultures: The case of swingers.Soc. Probl. 18: 488–495.Google Scholar
  34. Westoff, L. A., and Westoff, C. F. (1968).From Now to Zero: Fertility, Contraception and Abortion in America Little, Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
  35. Zelnik, M., and Kantner, J. F. (1972a). The probability of premarital intercourse.Soc. Sci. Res. 1: 335–341.Google Scholar
  36. Zelnik, M., and Kantner, J. F. (1972b). Sexuality, contraception and pregnancy among young unwed females in the United States. InDemographic and Social Aspects of Population Growth, Res. Vol. I, Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., pp. 355–374.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham B. Spanier
    • 1
  • Charles L. Cole
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Individual and Family StudiesPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyDenison UniversityGranvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations