Abstract
The history of scientific sex research which emerged at the turn of the century with the exemplary work of Sigmund Freud and Havelock Ellis has been complexly interactive with changing general social conditions, specific trends in sexual conduct, the content of sexual ideologies, and the developing techniques of scientific inquiry. The earliest sex researchers, although serving to bring sexuality out of the Victorian cold and into the center of human development, based their views of sexuality on control-repression and drive models. The Freudian tradition was especially influential in general intellectual matters and was probably the most important in the development of twentieth-century sexual ideologies. Beginning in the 1920s and culminating in the work of Kinsey in the 1940s and 1950s, a tradition of social bookkeeping began focusing on the sexual behavior of relatively normal persons. Methodologically such studies moved away from the case history and from populations who were defined as criminal or neurotic. At the same time, general social changes were occurring that were directly affecting the rates and directions of sexual conduct in the society. The work of Alfred Kinsey charted these changes and in turn influenced public attitudes, public policy, and research interests during the 1950s and 1960s. The work of other researchers began to fill in the picture of sexual conduct in the society from a survey point of view, and some workers began studies in sexual deviance that focused anew on homosexuality and prostitution. The work of William Masters and Virginia Johnson served to open the door to studies of sexual anatomy and physiology by applying well-known techniques to the laboratory study of the sexual. While the biological tradition is still strong in the discussion of the sexual, new emphases are being placed on a cognitive-social learning perspective that emphasizes the nonbiological factors in sexual development. Major changes have occurred in the sexual backdrop of the society in the 1960s, and, while changes in sexual conduct have been less than revolutionary, they have occurred in a number of areas (contraception, abortion) that have directly influenced societal practices. Sex research and the sex researcher have played an important role in providing benchmarks for sexual practices, illuminating general understanding, and providing the content for ideological debates about the right and wrong of sexuality in the society. In few areas of research have researchers had such an important role in the debate over the meaning and significance of the behavior they have studied.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bebel, A. (1883).Woman Under Socialism, 1971 edition, Shocken Books, New York.
Brecher, R., and Brecher, E., eds. (1966).An Analysis of Human Sexual Response Little, Brown, Boston.
Calder-Marshall, A. C. (1959).Havelock Ellis Rupert Hart Davis, London.
Collis, J. S. (1959).An Artist of Life Casall, London, p. 8.
Davis, K. B. (1929).Factors in the Sex Life of 2,200 Women Harper, New York.
Dickinson, R. L., and Beam, L. (1932).One Thousand Marriages Williams and Northgate, London.
Ellis, H. (1884).Views and Reviews: A Selection of Uncollected Articles (First Series, 1884–1919), D. Harmsworth, London, p. 18.
Ellis, H. (1932).Views and Reviews: A Selection of Uncollected Articles (Second Series, 1920–1932), D. Harmsworth, London, pp. 121–130.
Ellis, H. (1936).Studies in the Psychology of Sex, Vol. 1, No. 1, Random House, New York, p. 282 (original 1899).
Gagnon, J. H., and Simon, W. (1967). Pornography: Raging menace or paper tiger.Trans-Action 4: 41–48.
Gebhard, P.,et al. (1965).Sex Offenders: An Analysis of Types Harper and Row, New York.
Hamilton, G. V. (1929).A Study in Marriage Alfred and Charles Boni, New York.
Humphreys, R. A. L. (1972).Out of the Closets: The Sociology of Homosexual Liberation Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W., and Martin, C. (1948).Sexual Behavior in the Human Male Saunders, Philadelphia.
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W., Martin, C., and Gebhard, P. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female Saunders, Philadelphia.
LaFitte, F. (1967).Inaugural lecture of the Havelock Ellis Society. London (May).
Madge, J. (1962).The Origins of Scientific Sociology Free Press, New York.
Masters, W., and Johnson, V. (1966).Human Sexual Response Little, Brown, Boston.
Masters, W., and Johnson, V. (1970).Human Sexual Inadequacy Little, Brown, Boston.
Miller, P., Cottrell, C., and Simon, W. (1973). Some social and psychological correlates of adolescent sexuality. Paper presented at the Pacific Sociological Association Annual Meetings, Arizona.
Pomeroy, W. B. (1972).Doctor Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research Harper and Row, New York.
Reiss, I. (1967).The Social Context of Pre-marital Permissiveness Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Shaw, G. B. (1970).Collected Plays with Their Prefaces, Vol. 1, Max Reinhardt (ed.), The Bodley Head, London.
Sheehy, G. (1972). The landlords of Hell's bedroom.New York 5(47): 71 (November 20).
Simon, W., Berger, A. S., and Gagnon, J. H. (1972). Beyond anxiety and fantasy: The coital experiences of college youth.J. Youth Adolesc. 1: 203–232.
Trilling, L. (1950).The Liberal Imagination Viking Press, New York.
Zelnick, M., and Kantner, J. E. (1972).National Survey for the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Support for this research was provided by USPHS Grant HD 4157 and Postdoctoral Fellowship MH 53472.
This paper is a revised version of the Havelock Ellis Memorial Lecture presented in London, February 2, 1973, while the author was an Overseas Fellow of Churchill College, Cambridge.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gagnon, J.H. Sex research and social change. Arch Sex Behav 4, 111–141 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541078
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541078