Skip to main content
Log in

The need for performance auditing in the public sector and the best-practice frontier

  • Published:
European Journal of Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article is organized as follows. In Section 2 the arguments for performance auditing in the public sector are reviewed along the lines of the public-choice approach. An international comparison of the functions of supreme auditing institutions (Section 3) reveals that the BelgianRekenhof-Cour des Comptes lags behind, lacking a mandate for performance auditing. In Section 4 the notions of efficiency and effectiveness are clarified. Section S compares the concept of the best-practice frontier with a standard production function. In the public sector one is often confronted with a weak knowledge of the underlying technology. This poses problems of specification for a parametric estimation. Therefore a nonparametric frontier may be recommended. In Section 6 the Farrell method and the free disposal hull are presented. Moreover, when several inputs are transformed into a multiple output (instead of one single homogeneous output), data-envelopment analysis offers a solution (Section 7). These latter methods are also illustrated by an international empirical comparison of the efficiency of public enterprises: postal services in Section 6 and railway companies in Section 7. Some conclusions are reported in the final Section 8.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner, D., and S. Chu. (1968). “On Estimating the Industry Production Function.”American Economic Review 58(4), 826–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algemene, Rekenkamer. (1989). “An International Comparison of Auditing Authorities.” The Hague. Mimeo.

  • Atkinson, A., and J. Stiglitz. (1987).Lectures on Public Economics. London: Mc-Graw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckers, J. (1989). “Interne werking van het parlement: audit als functie van het Rekenhof.” Paper presented at the Politicologencongres, Brussels.

  • Charnes, A., W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. (1978). “Measuring Efficiency of Decision Making Units.European Journal of Operations Research 2, 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1981). “Data Envelopment Analysis: An Approach for Evaluation Program and Managerial Efficiency.”Management Science 27, 668–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L., D. Jorgenson, and L. Lau. (1973). “Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers.”Review of Economics and Statistics 55(1), 28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deprins, D., L. Simar, and H. Tulkens. (1984). “Measuring Labor Efficiency in Post Offices.” In M. Marchand, P. Pestieau, and H. Tulkens (eds.),The Performance of Public Enterprises: Concepts and Measurment. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 253–290.

  • Henley, D., C. Holtham, A. Likierman, and J. Perrin. (1989).Public Sector Accounting and Financial Control (3rd ed.). London: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, L. (1986). “Data Envelopment Analysis.” Catholic University of Leuven, Department of Applied Economics. Mimeo.

  • Ludwin, W., and T. Guthrie. (1989). “Assessing Productivity with Data Envelopment Analysis.”Public Productivity Review 4, 361–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. (1989).Public Choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muesen, W., and J. Van den Broeck. (1977). “Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error.”International Economic Review, 18, 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R., and P. Musgrave. (1984).Public Finance in Theory and Practice (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm, A. (1986). “Evolution de la performance de la Répie des Postes Belges par comparaison internationale.” Université de Liegè. Mimeo.

  • Tulkens, H. (1986). “La performance productive d'un service public: definitions, methodes de mesure et application la Répie des Postes de Belgique.”L'actualité économique: revue d'analyse économique, 62(2), 306–535.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moesen, W.A. The need for performance auditing in the public sector and the best-practice frontier. Eur J Law Econ 1, 263–274 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01540700

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01540700

Keywords

Navigation