Skip to main content
Log in

Book reviews

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Baibus, I. D. (1982).Marxism and Domination: A Neo-Hegelian, Feminist, Psychoanalytic Theory of Sexual, Political, and Technological Liberation. Princeton University, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorz, A. (1967).Strategy for Labor: A Radical Proposal, translated by Nicolaus, M. A., and Ortiz, V. Beacon Press, Boston (first published asStrategie Ouvriere et Neocapitalisme. Editions de Seuil, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorz, A. (1973).Socialism and Revolution, translated by Denny, N., Doubleday Anchor Books, Garden City, New York (first published asLe Socialisme Difficile. Editions de Seuil, 1967, with the addition of “Sartre and Marx,” first published inNew Left Review, No. 37, May–June, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorz, A. (1978). The tyranny of the factory: Today and Tomorrow, and technology, technicians and class struggle. In Gorz, A. (ed.).The Division of Labour: The Labour Process and Class Struggle in Modern Capitalism. The Harvester Press, Hassocks, Sussex, England (first published asCrítique de la Division du Travail. Editions de Seuil, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, A. (1981).The French New Left: An Intellectual History from Sartre to Gorz. South End Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary.Inquiry 16: 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Boserup, E. (1965).The Conditions of Agricultural Growth. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1970).Woman's Role in Economic Development. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, L. (1977). Man-environment relationships in anthropology and geography.Annals of the Association of American Geographers 67: 126–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, C. G., and Wilcox, R. R. (1976).Triumph or Triage? The World Food Problem in Geographical Perspective. Resource Paper No. 75-3, Commission on College Geography, Association of American Geographers, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Abruzzi, W. S. (1981).Ecological Succession and Mormon Colonization in the Little Colorado River Basin. Unpublished PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, T. D., Graves, N. B., and Kobrin, M. J. (1969). Historical inferences from Guttman scales: The return of age area magic?Current Anthropology 10: 317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1968).The Rise of Anthropological Theory. Thomas Y. Crowell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama, M. (1963). The second cybernetics: Deviation-amplifying mutual causal processes.American Scientist 51: 164–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plog, F. (1973). Diachronie anthropology. In Redman, C. (ed.),Research and Theory in Current Archaeology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Service, E. (1960). The law of evolutionary potential. In Sahlins, M., and Service, E. (eds.),Evolution and Culture. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Bunge, M. (1959). Do the levels of science reflect the levels of being? InMetascientific Queries. Charles C Thomas, Springfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1960). On the connections among levels. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Philosophy, Vol. VI, Metaphysics and Philosophy of Nature, Sansoni, Florence.

  • Bunge, M. (1963). Levels. InThe Myth of Simplicity: Problems of Scientific Philosophy. Prentice-Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1973). The metaphysics, epistemology and methodology of levels. InMethod, Model and Matter. D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht/Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, M. (1979). Hierarchical adaptability theory and its cross-correlation with dynamic ecological models. In Halfon, E. (ed.),Theoretical Systems Ecology: Advances and Case Studies. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feibleman, J. K. (1954). Theory of integrative levels.The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5(17): 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feibleman, J. K. (1965). The integrative levels in nature. In Kyle, B. R. F. (ed.),Focus on Information and Communication. Aslib, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatlin, L. L. (1972). The hierarchy and the game. InInformation Theory and the Living System. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grene, M. (1967). Biology and the problem of levels of reality.New Scholasticism 41: 427–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobstein, C. (1969). Organizational levels and explanation.Journal of the History of Biology 2(1): 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney, W. S. C. (1979). Ecological stability and social hierarchy.Theoretical Population Biology 16(1): 48–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, E. H. (1981). Organization, levels of organization, and machines. InThe Foundations of Biological Theory. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milsum, J. H. (1972). The hierarchical basis for general living systems. In Klir, G. J. (ed.),Trends in General Systems Theory. Wiley-Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novikoff, A. B. (1945). The concept of integrative levels and biology.Science 101(2618): 209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P. (1971).Fundamentals of Ecology. W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P. (1975).Ecology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P. (1983).Basic Ecology. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H. H. (1973).Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems. George Braziller, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portmann, A. (1964). Hierarchy of living forms. In Portmann, A. (ed.),New Paths in Biology. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, R. (ed.). (1942).Levels of Integration in Biological and Social Systems. The Jaques Cattell Press, Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidl, R. (1978).Order in Living Organisms: A Systems Analysis of Evolution. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J. S. (1961). The level-of-integration concept and ecology.Ecology 42(2): 420–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertlanffy, L. (1952). Levels of organization. In von Bertlanffy, L. (ed.),Problems of Life. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. R. (1979). Hierarchical organization of ecosystems. In Halfon, E. (ed.),Theoretical Systems Ecology: Advances and Case Studies. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, P. A. (1971). The basic concept of hierarchic systems. In Weiss, P. A. (ed.),Hierarchically Organized Systems in Theory and Practice. Hafner Publishing Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. L. (1978). Hiearchy and central place: Some questions of more general theory.Geografisker Annaler (Series B) 50(2): 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodman, J., Stone, L., Porter, P.W. et al. Book reviews. Hum Ecol 12, 319–341 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01540595

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01540595

Navigation