Abstract
Contemporary mysticism is in continuity with religious mysticism of all ages. Mysticism, like all religion, has an ideological and an experiential dimension. Traditional Freudian theory is inadequate for understanding either the ideological or the cognitive aspect, because it does not adequately account for either the cognitive process or the self-conscious “I.” Categories of both ego psychology and the social scientific approach to religion illuminate contemporary mysticism in ways unavailable to the traditional Freudian psychoanalytic approach. The epistemological implications of the mystical attitude are considered, in both the religious and the scientific enterprises.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bellah, R. N.,Beyond Belief. New York, Harper & Row, 1970, p. 21.
Troeltsch, E.,The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches, trans. O. Wyon. New York, Macmillan Co., 1931, p. 730.
Ibid..
Ibid., p. 731.
Ibid., p. 737.
Ibid., p. 739.
Ahlstrom, S.,A Religious History of the American People. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1972.
Ibid., p. 299.
GAP, Committee on Psychiatry and Religion,Mysticism: Spiritual Quest or Psychic Disorder? New York, Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, 1976, p. 775.
Underhill, E.,Practical Mysticism. New York, E. P. Dutton & Co. 1974, p. 30.
Greeley, A.,Ecstasy, a Way of Knowing. Englewood Cliffs, N. J., Prentice-Hall, 1974, p. 11.
Ibid..
op. cit..
Glock, C., and Bellah, R. N., eds.,The New Religious Consciousness. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1976, pp. 333–334.
Ibid., p. 336.
Ibid..
Ibid..
Ibid., p. 339.
Ibid., 340.
op. cit., p. 730.
op. cit., p. 792.
Ibid.. The committee here quotes Einstein's biographer, Hoffman, B.,Albert Einstein. New York, Viking Press, 1972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thayer, N.S.T. Perspectives on contemporary mysticism. J Relig Health 18, 230–240 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01540484
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01540484