Skip to main content
Log in

The world view factor in psychotherapy

  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Allport, G. W.,Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. New York, Henry Holt and Co., 1937, p. 540.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rokeach, M.,The Nature of Human Values. New York, The Free Press, 1973, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kluckhohn, F., and Strodtbeck, F. L.,Variations in Value Orientations. Evanston, Ill., Row, Peterson, 1961, pp. 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sahakian, W. S., “Philosophical Psychotherapy: An Existential Approach,”J. Individual Psychology, 1976,32, 62–68; and Strunk, O., Jr., “Principles of Axiotherapy,”J. Religion and Health, 1976,15, 241–246.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buchler, J.,Nature and Judgment. New York, Columbia University Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Allport, G. W.,Pattern and Growth in Personality. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wrightsman, L. S.,Assumptions about Human Nature: A Social-Psychological Approach. Monterey, Calif., Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  8. van Kaam, A.,Religion and Personality. Garden City, N. Y., Doubleday and Co., 1968, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kelly, G. R.,The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York, Norton, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morris, C.,Varieties of Human Values. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frankl, V. E.,The Doctor and the Soul: From Psychotherapy to Logotherapy. New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Of course, it is quite possible to take a much more limited view of the nature of the psychotherapeutic project, thus eliminating or at least reducing the central concerns of this paper. Empirically, however, we then need to acount for and confront those psychotherapeutic systems that assume and claim a more ambitious intention.

  13. I do need to note in this regard that personality propensities and the educational and training realities of these persons do tend to reinforce an intellectual bias; in this sense, it is often quite true that in terms of balancing or synthesizing the responses of thinking, feeling, and bodily expression, thinking often dominates. This does mean that it is quite often necessary to pay special attention to the intellectualizing mode as viewed in its original psychoanalytic sense.

  14. Oden, T.,After Therapy What? Springfield, Ill., Charles C Thomas, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson, P. E., “The Clinical Approach to Religion,”J. Pastoral Care, 1961,15, 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frank, J.,Persuasion and Healing. New York, Schocken Books, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strunk, O. The world view factor in psychotherapy. J Relig Health 18, 192–197 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01540480

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01540480

Keywords

Navigation