Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence ofCampylobacter pylori and association with antral mucosal histology in subjects with and without upper gastrointestinal symptoms

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine the incidence and significance of Campylobacter pyloriin patients undergoing routine endoscopic evaluation at this hospital, biopsies of the antrum were obtained from 132 patients and from 15 asymptomatic volunteers. Specimens were cultured and silver stained for the presence of C. pyloriand were examined histologically. C. pyloriwas detected in 67 (51%) patients and two (13%) volunteers (P=0.006).In patients, C. pyloriwas found significantly more often when the mucosa was inflamed (67%) than when the mucosa was normal (13%), and both volunteers with C. pylorihad chronic gastritis on histological examination. When compared to the volunteers, patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms had a significantly increased prevalence of antral inflammation, even if the endoscopic examination was normal. C. pyloriis infrequently found in young asymptomatic adults but is found in both asymptomatic volunteers and patients in association with all forms of histological antral gastritis which is prevalent in patients with both normal endoscopic findings and peptic ulcer disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krienitz W: Uber das Aufreten von Mageninhalt bei Carcinoma Ventriculi. Dtsch Med Wochenshr 22:872, 1906

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dogenes JL: Spriochaetes in the gastric glands ofMacacus rhesus and of man without related disease. Arch Pathol 27:469, 1939

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marshall BJ, Warren JR: Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet 1:1311–1315, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rollason TP, Stone J, Rhodes JM: Spiral organisms in endoscopic biopsies of the human stomach. J Clin Pathol 37:23–26, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McNulty CAM, Watson DM: Sprial bacteria of the gastric antrum. Lancet 1:1068, 1984 (letter)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kasper G, Kickgiesser N: Isolation from gastric epithelium ofCampylobacter-like organisms that are distinct from “Campylobacter pylorids”. Lancet 1:111–112, 1985 (letter)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Langenberg ML, Tygtat GNJ, Schipper MEI, Rietra PJGM, Zanen HC:Campylobacter-like organisms in the stomach of patients and healthy individuals. Lancet 1:1348–1349, 1984 (letter)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buck GE, Gourley WK, Lee WK, Subramanyam K, Latimer JM, DiNuzzo AR: Relation ofCampylobacter pyloridis to gastritis and peptic ulcer. J Infect Dis 153:664–669, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marshall BJ, Armstrong JA, McGechie DB, Glancy RJ: Attempt to fulfill Koch's postulates for pyloric campylobacter. Med J Aust 142(8):436–439, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morris A, Nicholson G: Ingestion ofCampylobacter pyloridis causes gastritis and raised fasting pH. Am J Gastroenterol 82:192–199, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peterson WL, Lee EL, Feldman M: GastricCampylobacter- like organisms in healthy humans: Correlation with endoscopic appearance and mucosal histology. Gastroenterology 90:1585, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marshall BJ, McGechie DB, Rogers PA, Glancy RJ: PyloricCampylobacter infection and gastroduodenal disease. Med J Aust 142(8):439–444, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen XG, Correa P, Offerhaus J, Rodriguez E, Janney F, Hoffmann E, Fox J, Hunter F, Diavolitsis S: Ultrastructure of the gastric mucosa harboringCampylobacter-like organisms. Am J Clin Pathol 86:575–582, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McNulty CAM, Gearty JC, Crump B, Davis M, Donovan IA, Melikian V, Lister DM, Wise R:Campylobacter pyloridis and associated gastritis: Investigator blind, placebo controlled trial of bismuth salicylate and erythromycin ethylsuccinate. Br Med J 293:645–649, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ho J, Lui WM, Ng MMT, Lam SK: A study on the correlation of duodenal-ulcer healing withCampylobacter- like organisms. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1:69–74, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  16. Steer HW: Surface morphology of the gastroduodenal mucosa in duodenal ulceration. Gut 25:1203–1210, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marshall BJ, Goodwin CS, Warren JR, Murray R, Blincow E, Blackbourn S, Phillips M, Waters T, Sanderson C: Long term healing of gastritis and low duodenal ulcer relapse after eradication ofCampylobacter pyloridis: A prospective double blind study. Gastroenterology 92:1518, 1987 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Coughlan G, Gilligan D, Humphries H, McKenna D, Dooley C, Sweeny E, Keane C, O'Morain C:Campylobacter pyloridis and relapse of duodenal ulcers. Gastroenterology 92:1355, 1987 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jones DM, Eddidge J, Fox AJ, Sethi P, Whorwell PJ: Antibody to the gastricCampylobacter-like organism (“Campylobacter pyloridis”): Clinical correlations and distribution in the normal population. J Med Microbiol 22:57–62, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Graham DY, Klein PD, Opekun AR, Alpert LC, Klish W, Evans DJ, Evans DG, Michaletz PA, Yoshimura HH, Adam E, Boutton TW: Epidemiology ofCampylobacter pyloridis infection. Gastroenterology 92:1411, 1987 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pettross, C.W., Appleman, M.D., Cohen, H. et al. Prevalence ofCampylobacter pylori and association with antral mucosal histology in subjects with and without upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Digest Dis Sci 33, 649–653 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01540425

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01540425

Key words

Navigation