Skip to main content
Log in

Factor substitution in small and large U.S. manufacturing establishments: 1977–82

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this article is to assess the possibility of differences in factor substitution in the production of small and large U.S. manufacturing establishments. For empirical implementation, we specify and estimate separate three-factor translog production factors, using confidential plant-level data for five four-digit industries extracted from the U.S. Bureau of the Census Longitudinal Research Database. Our primary finding is that for most industries under study, small establishments appear to be at least as flexible as large establishments in factor substitution. This finding, together with our previous results on economies of scale (Nguyen and Reznek, 1991), suggests that for the five industries under examination, large size is not a necessary condition for efficient production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, R. D. G., 1938,Mathematical Analysis For Economists, London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. G. and J. G. Thursby, 1986,‘Confidence Intervals for Elasticity Estimators in Translog Models’,Review of Economics and Statistics 3, 647–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, E. R. and L. R. Christensen, 1973, ‘The Translog Function and the Substitution of Equipment, Structures, and Labor in U.S. Manufacturing 1929–68’,Journal of Econometrics 1, 81–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, E. R. and D. O. Wood, 1975, ‘Technology, Process, and the Derived Demand for Energy’,The Review of Economics and Statistics 68, 647–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C. and R. R. Russell, 1989, ‘Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand Up? (A Comparison of the Allen/Uzawa and Morishima Elasticities)’,American Economic Review 79, 882–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W. A. and D. S. Evans, 1986,The Economics of Small Business: Their Role and Regulation in the U.S. Economy, New York: Hohlms and Meier Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess D. F., 1975, ‘Duality Theory and Pitfalls in the Specification of Technologies’,Journal of Econometrics 3, 105–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. G., 1988,Applied Production Analysis: A Dual Approach, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. R. and W. H. Green, 1976, ‘Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation’,Journal of Political Economy 84, 655–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. R., D. W. Jorgenson, and L. J. Lau, 1971, ‘Conjugate Duality and the Transcendental Logarithmic Production Function’,Econometrica 39, 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhrymes, P. J., 1989, ‘Autoregressive Errors in Singular Systems of Equations’, unpublished paper presented at the Center for Economic Studies Seminar on April 13.

  • Diewert, W. E. and T. J. Wales, 1987, ‘Flexible Functional Forms and Global Curvature Conditions’,Econometrica 55, 43–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilkey, D. K., C. A. K. Lovell, and R. C. Sickles, 1983, ‘A Comparison of the Performance of Three Flexible Functional Forms’,International Economic Review 24, 591–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kmenta J. and R. F. Gilbert, 1968, ‘Small Sample Properties of Alternatives Estimators of Seemingly Unrelated Regressions’,Journal of the American Statistical Association 63, 1180–1200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokkelenberg, E. C. and S. V. Nguyen, 1987, ‘A Comparison of Three Flexible Functional Cost Forms Using Plant Level Data’, Paper presented at the 1987 American Economic Association Conference in Chicago, December.

  • Kokkelenberg, E. C. and S. V. Nguyen, 1989, ‘Modelling Technical Progress and Multifactor Productivity: A Plant Level Example’,Journal of Productivity Analysis 1, 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D., 1978, ‘The General Linear Profit Function’, in M. Fuss and D. McFadden (eds.),Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Application, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 269–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuckin, R. and G. Pascoe, 1988, ‘The Longitudinal Research Database: Status and Research Possibilities’,Survey of Current Business, 30–37.

  • Magnus, J. R., 1979, ‘Substitution Between Energy and Non-Energy in the Netherlands 1950–1976’,International Economic Review 20, 465–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschak, T. and R. R. Nelson, 1962, ‘Flexibility, Uncertainty, and Economic Theory’,Metroeconomica 14, 42–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, D. E. and L. Schumann, 1985, ‘Industry Structure with Fluctuating Demand’,American Economic Review 4, 758–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, S. V. and A. Reznek, 1989, ‘Production Technologies, Economies of Scale, and Factor Substitution in Large and Small U. S. Manufacturing Establishment: A Pilot Study’, AReport submitted to the U.S. Small Business Administration, October.

  • Nguyen, S. V. and A. Reznek, 1991, ‘Returns to Scale in Small and Large U.S. Manufacturing Establishments’,Small Business Economics 3, 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc., 1984,SAS Users Guide Version 5 Edition, Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc., 1985, SAS Users Guide: Basics, Version 5 Edition, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, J. L., 1987, ‘The Capital-Energy Complementarity Debate Revisited’,American Economic Review 77, 605–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. 1939, ‘Production and Distribution in the Short-Run’,Journal of Political Economy 47, 305–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Small Business Administration, 1987,The State of Small Business: A Report of the President to the Congress 1987, Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A., 1963, ‘Estimators of Seemingly Unrelated Regressions: Some Exact Finite Samples Results’,Journal of American Statistical Association 58, 977–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nguyen, S.V., Reznek, A.P. Factor substitution in small and large U.S. manufacturing establishments: 1977–82. Small Bus Econ 5, 37–54 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539317

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539317

Keywords

Navigation