The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 19–58 | Cite as

Praxeology and understanding: An analysis of the controversy in Austrian Economics

  • G. A. Selgin
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blanshard, Brand.Reason and Analysis. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. Bowley, Marian.Nassau Senior and Classical Economics. New York: Octagon Books, 1967.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, Morris R.The Meaning of Human History, 2nd ed. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, 1961.Google Scholar
  4. —.Reason and Nature: An Essay on the Meaning of Scientific Method. New York: Dover, 1978.Google Scholar
  5. Egger, John B. “The Austrian Method.” InNew Directions in Austrian Economics, Louis M. Spadaro, ed. Kansas City, Kans.: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, 1978, pp. 19–39.Google Scholar
  6. Harris, Errol E.Hypothesis and Perception: The Roots of Scientific Method. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1970.Google Scholar
  7. Hayek, Friedrich A. “Economics and Knowledge.” InIndividualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948, pp. 33–56.Google Scholar
  8. Kirzner, Israel M.Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  9. —.The Economic Point of View. Kansas City, Kans.: Sheed and Ward, 1976.Google Scholar
  10. - ed.Method, Process, and Austrian Economics: Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1982.Google Scholar
  11. Knight, Frank H. “The Limits of Scientific Method in Economics.” InThe Ethics of Competition and Other Essays. New York: Harper Bros., 1935.Google Scholar
  12. Koppl, Roger. “Alfred Schutz and George Shackle: Two Views of Choice.” Unpublished ms., Spring 1982.Google Scholar
  13. Lachmann, Ludwig M. “From Mises to Shackle: An Essay on Austrian Economics and the Kaleidic Society.”Journal of Economic Literature XIV (1) (March 1976), pp. 54–62.Google Scholar
  14. —.The Legacy of Max Weber. Berkeley: Glendessary Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  15. -. “Reflections on Hayekian Capital Theory.” Unpublished ms., 1975.Google Scholar
  16. —. “The Role of Expectations in Economics as a Social Science.” InCapital, Expectations and the Market Process. Kansas City, Kans.: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, 1977, pp. 65–80.Google Scholar
  17. Latsis, Spiro J. “A Research Program in Economics.” InMethod and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge, England: University Press, 1976, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
  18. Menger, CarlProblems of Economics and Sociology. Trans. and ed. James Dingwall and Bert F. Hoselitz. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  19. Mill, John StuartEssays on some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy, 2nd ed. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer, 1874.Google Scholar
  20. Mises, Ludwig von. “‘Elastic Expectations’ and the Austrian Theory of the Trade Cycle.”Economica 10 (n.s.) (August 1943), pp. 251–52.Google Scholar
  21. —.Epistemological Problems of Economics. Trans. George Reisman. New York: New York University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  22. —.Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, 3rd ed. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1966.Google Scholar
  23. —.Notes and Recollections. Trans. Hans F. Sennholz. South Holland, Ill.: Libertarian Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  24. —. “Profit and Loss.” InPlanning for Freedom, 2nd ed. South Holland, Ill.: Libertarian Press, 1962, pp. 108–50.Google Scholar
  25. —. “The Treatment of ‘Irrationality’ in the Social Sciences.”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research IV (4) (June 1944), pp. 527–53.Google Scholar
  26. —.The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science. Kansas City, Kans.: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, 1978.Google Scholar
  27. Montague, William Pepperall.The Ways of Knowing. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1925.Google Scholar
  28. Morgenstern, Oskar “Perfect Foresight and Economic Equilibrium.” InSelected Economic Writings of Oskar Morgenstern, Andrew Schotter, ed. New York: New York University Press, 1976, pp. 169–83.Google Scholar
  29. O'Driscoll, Gerald P., Jr., and Mario Rizzo.The Economics of Time and Uncertainty. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1984.Google Scholar
  30. Popper, Karl. “Of Clocks and Clouds.” InObjective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1972, pp. 206–55.Google Scholar
  31. Rothbard, Murray N. “In Defense of ‘Extreme Apriorism.’”Southern Economic Journal XXIII (3) January 1957), pp. 314–20.Google Scholar
  32. —.Man, Economy, and State: A Treatise on Economic Principles. Princeton, N.J.: D. Van Nostrand, 1962.Google Scholar
  33. —. “Praxeology: The Method of Austrian Economics.” InThe Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics, Edwin G. Dolan, ed. Kansas City, Kans.: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, 1976, pp. 19–39.Google Scholar
  34. Schutz, Alfred. “Common Sense and the Scientific Interpretation of Human Action.” InPhilosophy of the Social Sciences, Maurice Natanson, ed. New York: Random House, 1963, pp. 302–46.Google Scholar
  35. —.The Phenomenology of the Social World. Trans. George Walsh and Frederick Lehnert. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  36. Shackle, G.L.S.Epistemics and Economics: A Critique of Economic Doctrines. Cambridge, England: University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  37. —. “Time, Nature, and Decision.” InThe Nature of Economic Thought. Cambridge, England: University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  38. Shils, Edward, and H.L. Finch, eds.Max Weber on the Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  39. White, Lawrence H. “Entrepreneurship, Imagination, and the Question of Equilibrium.” Unpublished ms., 1976.Google Scholar
  40. —. “The Methodology of the Austrian School of Economics.” Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1984.Google Scholar
  41. -. “Uncertainty and Entrepreneurial Expectation in Economic Theory.” Unpublished ms., 1977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D.C. Heath and Company 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. A. Selgin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations