Skip to main content

Prevalence studies of problem gambling in the United States

Journal of Gambling Studies volume 12, pages 111–128 (1996)Cite this article

Abstract

The rapid expansion of legalized gambling in the United States has produced tremendous demands for information about the number and characteristics of problem gamblers in the general population. This paper examines the results of prevalence studies of problem and pathological gambling that have been carried out in the United States. The discussion is largely chronological, with a focus on comparative findings from the 15 United States jurisdictions where prevalence studies have been completed since 1980. The results of diese studies verify findings from clinical and experimental studies as well as suggesting important avenues for future research. The paper concludes with a consideration of the role played by survey research in advancing the field of gambling research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Abbott, M.W. & Volberg, R.A. (1992).Frequent gamblers and problem gamblers in New Zealand: Report on Phase Two of the national survey. Research Series No. 14. Wellington: New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, E.M. (1993). 1992 gross annual wager: Industry rebounds with 8.4% handle gain.Gaming &Wagering Business, 14, 12–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen/Cummings Associates. (1992).Legal gambling in Connecticut: Assessment of current status and options for the future. Report to the Connecticut Division of Special Revenue.

  • Connor, M. (1993). Indian gaming: Prosperity and controversy.Gaming &Wagering Business, 14, 1, 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culleton, R.P. (1985).A survey of pathological gamblers in the state of Ohio. Report to the Ohio Lottery Commission.

  • Culleton, R.P. (1989). The prevalence rates of pathological gambling: A look at methods.Journal of Gambling Behavior, 5, 22–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, M.G. (1993). A preliminary exploration of a two-stage methodology in the assessment of the extent and degree of gambling-related problems in the Australian population. In W.R. Eadington & J.A. Cornelius (Eds.),Gambling behavior and problem gambling. (pp. 347–364). Reno: University of Nevada Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, F.J. (1988).Survey research methods. Revised Edition. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallick, M., Suits, D., Dielman, T. & Hybels, J. (1979).A survey of American gambling attitudes and behavior. Research Report Series, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laundergan, J.C. (1992).Measuring pathological gambling in a general population and a chemically dependent population using SOGS and a modified SOGS (MOGS). Paper presented at the Sixth National Conference on Gambling Behavior.

  • Laundergan, J.C., Schaefer, J.M., Eckhoff, K.F. & Pirie, P.L. (1990).Adult survey of Minnesota gambling behavior: A benchmark, 1990. Report to the Minnesota Department of Human Services, Mental Health Division.

  • Lesieur, H.R. & Blume, S.B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers.American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, L.B. (1985). The epidemiology of pathological gambling: Critique of existing research and alternative strategies.Journal of Gambling Behavior, 1, 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt, C.S. & Cook, T.D. (1979). Beyond qualitativeversus quantitative methods. In T.D. Cook & C.S. Reichardt (Eds.),Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research (pp. 7–32). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, I. (1988). Pathological gambling: Estimating prevalence and group characteristics.International Journal of the Addictions, 23, 477–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R.A. (1992).Gambling involvement and problem gambling in Montana. Report to the Montana Department of Corrections and Human Services.

  • Volberg, R.A. (1993a). Estimating the prevalence of pathological gambling in the United States. In W.R. Eadington & J.A. Cornelius (Eds.),Gambling behavior and problem gambling. (pp. 365–378). Reno: University of Nevada Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R.A. (1993b).Gambling and problem gambling in Washington State. Report to the Washington State Lottery.

  • Volberg, R.A. (1994). The prevalence and demographics of pathological gamblers: Implications for public health.American Journal of Public Health, 84, 237–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R.A. & Abbott, M.W. (1994). Lifetime prevalence estimates of pathological gambling in New Zealand.International Journal of Epidemiology, 23, 976–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R.A. & Banks, S.M. (1990). A review of two measures of pathological gambling in the United States.Journal of Gambling Behavior, 6, 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R.A. & Silver, E. (1993).Gambling and problem gambling in North Dakota. Report to the North Dakota Department of Human Services, Division of Mental Health.

  • Volberg, R.A. & Steadman, H.J. (1988). Refining prevalence estimates of pathological gambling.American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 502–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R.A. & Stuefen, R.M. (1991).Gambling and problem gambling in South Dakota. Report to the Governor's Office of South Dakota.

  • Walker, M.B. (1992).The psychology of gambling. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallisch, L. (1993).The 1992 Texas survey of adult gambling behavior. Report to the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gemini Research, 310 Poplar Street, 16673, Roaring Spring, PA

    Rachel A. Volberg Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Rachel A. Volberg Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The author would like to acknowledge the Connecticut Division of Special Revenues, the Iowa Department of Human Services, the Montana Department of Corrections and Human Services, the New York State Office of Mental Health, the North Dakota Department of Human Services, the University of South Dakota Business Research Bureau, the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse and the Washington State Lottery for funding several of the gambling surveys discussed here. A substantial proportion of the research reported here was supported by a grant (MH 44295) from the Violence and Traumatic Stress Research Branch of the National Institute of Mental Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Volberg, R.A. Prevalence studies of problem gambling in the United States. J Gambling Stud 12, 111–128 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539169

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539169

Keywords

  • Experimental Study
  • General Population
  • Problem Gambler
  • Prevalence Study
  • Pathological Gambling