Skip to main content
Log in

The dose-response relationship for ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations at the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase locus in Chinese hamster ovary cells

  • Published:
Somatic Cell Genetics

Abstract

The frequency of ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)-induced mutations to 6-thioguanine resistance in a Chinese hamster ovary cells done K 1-BH4 was studied at many EMS doses including the minimally lethal range (0–100 μg/ml) as well as the exponential killing portion (100–800 μg/ml) of the survival curve. The mutation frequency increases approximately in proportion with increasing EMS concentration at a fixed treatment time. The pooled data for the observed mutation frequency, f(X), as a function of EMS dose X, is adequately described by a linear function f(X)=10−6(8.73+3.45 X), where 0≤X≤800 μg/ml. One interpretation of the linear dose-response is that, as a result of EMS treatment, ethylation of cellular constituents occurs, which is directly responsible for the mutation. Biochemical analyses demonstrate that most of the randomly isolated 6-thioguanine-resistant variants possess a highly reduced or undetectable level of HGPRT activity suggesting that the EMS-induced mutations to 6-thioguanine resistance affect primarily, if not exclusively, the HGPRT locus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Puck, T. T., and Marcus, P. I. (1955).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 41:432–437.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Puck, T. T., Marcus, P. I., and Cieciura, S. J. (1956).J. Exp. Med. 103:273–284.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Puck, T. T., and Fisher, H. W. (1956).J. Exp. Med. 104:427–434.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lieberman, I., and Ove, P. (1959).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 45:867–872.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Puck, T. T., and Kao, F. T. (1967).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 58:1227–1234.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kao, F. T., and Puck, T. T. (1968).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 60:1275–1281.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chu, E. H. Y., and Malling, H. V. (1968).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sel U.S.A. 61:1306–1312.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kao, F. T., and Puck, T. T. (1969).J. Cell. Physiol. 74:245–258.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kao, F. T., and Puck, T. T. (1971).J. Cell. Physiol. 78:139–144.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chu, E. H. Y. (1971). In Hollaender, A. (ed.),Chemical Mutagens: Principles and Methods for their Detection, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 411–444.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thompson, L. H., and Baker, R. M. (1973). In Prescott, D. M. (ed.),Methods in Cell Biology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 209–281.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Albrecht, A. M., Biedler, J. L., and Hutchison, D. J. (1972).Cancer Res. 32:1539–1546.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chan, V. L., Whitmore, G. E., and Siminovitch, L. (1972).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69:3119–3123.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Beaudet, A. L., Roufa, D. J., and Caskey, C. T. (1973).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70:320–324.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharp, J. D., Capecchi, N. E., and Capecchi, M. R. (1973).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70:3145–3149.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson, L. H., Harkins, J. L., and Stanners, C. P. (1973).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70:3094–3098.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chasin, L. A., Feldman, A., Konstam, M., and Urlaub, G. (1974)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71:718–722.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Littlefield, J. W. (1964).Science 145:709–710.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bridges, B. A., and Huckle, J. (1970).Mutat. Res. 10:141–151.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huberman, E., Aspiras, L., Heidelberger, C., Grover, P. I., and Sims, P. (1971).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 68:3195–3199.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Arlett, C. F., and Harcourt, S. A. (1972).Mutat. Res. 16:301–306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Albertini, R. J., and DeMars, R. (1973).Mutat. Res. 18:199–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chasin, L. A. (1973).J. Cell. Physiol. 82:299–308.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Harris, M. (1973).Genetics (Suppl.) 73:181–185.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Puck, T. T. (1964).Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 29:167–176.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hsie, A. W., and Puck, T. T. (1971)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 68:358–361.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schröder, C. H., and Hsie, A. W. (1973)Nature (London), New Biol. 246:58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ham, R. G., and Puck, T. T. (1962). In Colowick, S. P. and Kaplan, N. O. (eds.),Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 5, Academic Press, New York, pp. 90–119.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951).J. Biol. Chem. 193:265–275.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gillin, F. D., Roufa, D. J., Beaudet, A. L., and Caskey, C. T. (1972).Genetics 72:239–252.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Atkinson, M. R., and Murray, A. W. (1965).Biochem. J. 94:64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dunnett, C. W. (1955).J. Am. Statist. 50:1096–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Roy-Burman, P. (1970). In Rentchnick, R. (ed.),Recent Results in Cancer Research, Vol. 25, Springer-Verlag, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin, pp. 9–35.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kreig, D. R. (1963).Genetics 48: 561–580.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsie, A.W., Brimer, P.A., Mitchell, T.J. et al. The dose-response relationship for ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations at the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase locus in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Somat Cell Mol Genet 1, 247–261 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01538449

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01538449

Keywords

Navigation