Skip to main content

Determinants of peer social status: Contributions of physical appearance, reputation, and behavior

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine behavioral correlates of social status and the relative importance of physical appearance, reputation, and current behavior in the assignment of social status by peers. Sixty-eight children identified as either popular, rejected, or neglected by peers were photographed individually and were videotaped during school lunch for 10 six-minute segments each. In a second sample of children those identified as popular, rejected, or neglected by their peers either viewed selected videotapes or photographs of same-age and same-sex children who were popular, rejected, or neglected, and categorized the viewed child as to his/her social competence. The bids of popular children were more likely to be clear, elicit attention, and continue beyond a simple bid-response sequence than were those of rejected or neglected children. The photographs and videotapes of both popular and neglected children were rated more positively than were those of rejected children.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Asher, S. R., and Dodge, A. (1985). Identifying children who are rejected by their peers.Develop. Psychol. 22: 444–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, S. R., and Wheeler, A. A. (1985). Children's loneliness: A comparison of rejected and neglected peer status.J. Consul. Clin. Psychol. 53: 500–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierman, K. L., and Furman, W. (1984). The effects of social skills training and peer involvement on the social adjustment of preadolescents.Child Develop. 55: 151–162.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brion-Meisels, S., and Selman, R. L. (1984). Early adolescent development of new interpersonal strategies: Understanding and interventions.School Psychol. Rev. 13: 278–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, C. L., Lahey, B. B., and Neeper, R. (1984). Peer assessment of the social behavior of accepted, rejected, and nonglected children.J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 12: 187–198.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. L., and Elliott, S. N. (1984). Social competence and social skills: Development, assessment, and intervention.Sch. Psychol. Rev. 13: 265–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., and Dodge, K. A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children's social status: A five-year longitudinal study.Merrill-Palmer Quart. 29: 261–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., and Krehbiel, G. (1984). Effects of academic tutoring on the social status of low-achieving, socially rejected children.Child Develop. 55: 1465–1478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., and Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective.Develop. Psychol. 18: 557–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, E. L., Pederson, A., Babiglan, H., Izzo, L. D., and Trost, M. A. (1973). Long-term follow-up of early detected vulnerable children.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 41: 438–446.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A. (1980). Social cognition and children's aggressive behavior.Child Develop. 51: 162–170.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, S. L., and Ritchey, W. L. (1985). Behavioral correlates of sociometric status of fourth-, fifth-, and sixth-grade children in two classroom situations.Behav. Assess. 7: 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A. P., and Pentz, M. A. (1984). Psychological skill training and the aggressive adolescent.School Psychol. Rev. 13: 311–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F. M., and Elliott, S. N. (1984). Assessment and classification of children's social sckills: A review of methods and issues.Sch. Psychol. Rev. 13: 292–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartup, W. W. (1983). Peer relations. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.),Handbook of Child Psychology. Vol. 4. Socialization, Personality, and Social Development (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymel, S. (1986). Interpretations of peer behavior: Affective bias in childhood and adolescence.Child Develop. 57: 431–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J. H. (1988). Issues in the identification of socially incompetent children.School Psychol. Rev. 17: 276–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J. H., and Downs, A. C. (1979). Peer relations as a function of physical attractiveness: The eye of the beholder or behavioral reality?Child Develop. 50: 409–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J. H., and Stephan, C. (1977). The effects of physical attractiveness and ethnicity on children's behavioral attributions and peer preference.Child Develop. 48: 1694–1698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann, C. A. (1957). Teachers, peers, and tests as predictors of adjustment.J. Educat. Psychol. 48: 257–267.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is based, in part, on a presentation made at the Southeastern Conference on Human Development, April 1986.

Received Ph.D. in Psychology from Georgia State University in 1980. Primary research interests are social competence development, peer relations, and mother-child attachment.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennedy, J.H. Determinants of peer social status: Contributions of physical appearance, reputation, and behavior. J Youth Adolescence 19, 233–244 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537889

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537889

Keywords

  • Health Psychology
  • Social Status
  • Social Competence
  • Physical Appearance
  • Current Behavior