Abstract
Using techniques derived from information theory, structural dimensions of adolescent self-images were studied. Within a sample of 58 adolescents, patients and normals, a variety of self-images were obtained using a specially designed Q-sort. The initial hypothesis predicted, on the basis of previous findings, that the idealized self-images would be more polarizedfor the patients. This hypothesis was only partiallyconfirmed. the self-idealization was significantly more polarized in the patient group. But the other two idealizations (those based on parental expectations) did not reflect a patient-normal difference. Rather, a significant three-way interaction of sex, age, and psychiatric status was found for these self-images, as well as for the current self-image. The consistent pattern in these three-way interactions was that late-adolescent boys polarized their self-images if they were in the normal group and had structurally complex (nonpolarized) self-images if they were in the patient group. The paper concludes by discussing the meaning of these findings. A framework for interpreting polarization is proposed and applied to the results. In addition, the notion of a “Self-Image Profile” is formulated and further elaborated. Finally, the relevance of these studies to other personality research and clinical observations is considered.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attneave, F. (1959).Applications of Information Theory to Psychology, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Bieri, J., Atkins, A., Briar, S., Leaman, R., Miller, H., and Tripodi, T. (1968).Clinical and Social Judgment: The Discrimination of Behavioral Information, Wiley, New York.
Bion, W. R. (1959).Experiences in Groups, Basic Books, New York.
Block, J. (1961).The Q-Sort Method in Personality Assessment and Psychiatric Research, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Ill.
Coopersmith, S. (1967).The Antecedents of Self-Esteem, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Engel, M. (1958). The stability of the self-concept in adolescence.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 58: 74–83.
Erikson, E. H. (1968).Identity: Youth and Crisis, Norton, New York.
Gergen, K. J. (1971).The Concept of Self, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Guntrip, H. J. (1971).Psychoanalytic Theory, Therapy and the Self, Basic Books, New York.
Hauser, S. T. (1971a).Black and White Identity Formation, Wiley, New York.
Hauser, S. T. (1971b). Cognition and Identity Development in Early and Late Adolescence: Longitudinal Studies. Individual Project M-AP(c)-17-5 Report July 1, 1970, through June 30, 1971, Personality Development Section, Adult Psychiatry Branch, National Institute of Mental Health.
Hauser, S. T. (1972a). Black and white identity development: Aspects and perspectives.J. Youth Adolesc. 1(2): 113–130.
Hauser, S. T. (1972b). Adolescent self-image development: Longitudinal studies of black and white boys.Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 27: 537–541.
Hauser, S. T., and Shapiro, R. L. (1972). The differentiation of adolescent self-images. Presented at Annual American Psychiatric Association Meetings, Dallas (to be published inArch. Gen. Psychiat.).
Hollingshead, A. (1957).Two Factor Index of Social Class, Mimeo, New Haven.
Kernberg, O. (1968). The treatment of patients with borderline personality organization.Internat. J. Psychoanal. 49: 600–619.
Kohut, H. (1971).The Analysis of the Self: A Systematic Approach to the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorders, International University Press, New York.
Leff, H. S. (1969). Context, Psychiatric Diagnosis and Language. National Institute of Mental Health Grant Proposal.
Marcus, D., Offer, D., Blatt, S., and Gratch, D. (1966). A clinical approach to the understanding of normal and pathologic adolescence.Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 15: 569–576.
O'Donovan, D. (1965). Rating extremity: Pathology or meaningfulness?Psychol. Rev. 72: 358–372.
Rosenberg, M. (1965).Society and the Adolescent Self-Image, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Rice, A. K. (1965).Learning for Leadership: Interpersonal and Intergroup Relations, Tavistock, London.
Schaffer, R. (1968).Aspects of Internalization, International University Press, New York.
Shapiro, R. L. (1968). Action and family interaction in adolescence. In Marmor, J. (ed.),Modern Psychoanalysis, Basic Books, New York.
Stephenson, W. (1953).The Study of Behavior, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Winer, B. J. (1962).Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This investigation was supported in part by a Research Scientist Development Award, Number K1-70-178, to S.T.H.
Received M.A. in social anthropology from Harvard University and M.D. from Yale University. Candidate, Boston Psychoanalytic Institute, 1969-. Currently studying self-image and cognitive development in populations of normal and psychiatrically impaired adolescents, from individual and group perspectives.
Received M.D. from the University of Chicago; attended the Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute (1952–1954) and the Washington Psychoanalytic Institute (1954–1961). Presently on staff of Washington School of Psychiatry and Washington Psychoanalytic Institute. Major research interests are adolescence and the family and psychoanalytic-oriented treatment in conjunction with a ward or in-patient milieu therapy. Specific interest is identity formation of adolescence.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hauser, S.T., Shapiro, R.L. Dimensions of adolescent self-images. J Youth Adolescence 1, 339–353 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537823
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537823