Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to reexamine the relationship between sex-role orientation and self-esteem in adolescence. One hundred and six senior high school students completed the Rosenberg self-esteem measure (Rosenberg, 1965) and two measures of sex-role orientation, the Bem Sex Role Inventory, Short Form (BSRI; Bem, 1981), and the Personal Attributes Questionnaire Short Form (PAQ; Spence et al., 1975). The relationship between sex-role orientation and self-esteem was found to vary depending on the sex-role measure employed. Results of the BSRI revealed that androgynous individuals had higher levels of self-esteem than masculine, feminine, and undifferentiated adolescents. PAQ results indicated that androgynous individuals had higher levels of self-esteem than feminine and undifferentiated individuals. When the independent contributions of masculinity and femininity were assessed, both BSRI and PAQ masculinity and femininity significantly predicted self-esteem. Analyses also revealed that the effects of sex-role orientation on self-esteem varied by sex across both the BSRI and PAQ. Implications of the present findings for previous work on sex-role development in adolescence are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baucom, D. (1980). Indpendent CPI masculinity and femininity scales: Psychological correlates and a sex-role typology.J. Personal. Assess. 44: 262–271.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 47: 155–162.
Bem, S. L. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 45: 196–205.
Bem, S. L. (1979). Theory and measurement of androgyny: A reply to the Pedhazur-Tetenbaum and Locksley-Colten critiques.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 37: 1047–1054.
Bem, S. L. (1981).Bem Sex Role Inventory Professional Manual, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, Calif.
Bernard, L. (1980). Multivariate analysis of new sex role formulations and personality.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 38: 323–336.
Berzins, J. L., Welling, M. A., and Wetter, R. E. (1978). A new measure of psychological androgyny based on the Personality Research Form.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 46: 126–138.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20: 37–46.
Duncan, D. (1955). Multiple range and multipleF tests.Biometrics 11: 1–42.
Erikson, E. (1950).Childhood and Society, Norton, New York.
Flaherty, J., and Dusek, J. (1980). An investigation of the relationship between psychological androgyny and components of self-concept.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 38: 984–992.
Gaudreau, P. (1977). Factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 45: 299–302.
Heilbrun, A. B. (1976). Measurement of masculine and feminine sex role identities as independent dimensions.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 44: 183–190.
Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., and Holahan, C. K. (1979). Psychological androgyny and sex role flexibility: A test of two hypotheses.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 37: 1631–1644.
Ickes, W., and Barnes, R. (1978). Boys and girls together and alienated: On enacting stereotyped sex roles in mixed-sex dyads.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 36: 669–683.
Jones, W., Chernovetz, M., and Hansson, R. (1978). The enigma of androgyny: Differential implications for males and females?Consult. Clin. Psychol. 46: 298–313.
Kelly, J., and Worell, J. (1977). New formulations of sex roles and androgyny: A critical review.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 45: 1101–1115.
Kelly, J., Furman, W., and Young, V. (1978). Problems associated with the typological measurement of sex roles and androgyny.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 46: 1574–1576.
Kirk, R. (1968).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences, Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif.
Pedhazur, E., and Tetenbaum, T. (1979). Bem Sex Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 37: 996–1016.
Rosenberg, M. (1965).Society and the Adolescent Self-Image, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Silber, E., and Tippett, J. (1965). Self-esteem: Clinical assessment and measurement validation.Psychol. Rep. 16: 1017–1071.
Silvern, L. E., and Ryan, V. L. (1979). Self-rated adjustment and sex-typing on the Bem Sex Role Inventory: Is masculinity the primary predictor of adjustment?Sex Roles 5: 739–763.
Spence, J., and Helmreich, R. (1979). The many faces of androgyny: A reply to Locksley and Colten.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 37: 1032–1046.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., and Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 32: 29–39.
Wells, K. (1980). Gender-role identity and psychological adjustment in adolescence.J. Youth Adoles. 9: 59–73.
Whetton, C., and Swindells, T. (1977). A factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory.J. Clin. Psychol. 33: 150–153.
Worell, J. (1978). Sex roles and psychological well-being: Perspectives on methodology.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 46: 771–791.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received Ph.D. in human development and family studies from Texas Tech University. Present research interests are sex-role orientation and its relationship to self-esteem, adjustment, and shyness in adolescents and young adults.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lamke, L.K. Adjustment and sex-role orientation in adolescence. J Youth Adolescence 11, 247–259 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537470
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537470