Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between behavior in the home environment and perception of family social climate and personal well-being in a social-ecological perspective. Participants in the study were 46 eighth-grade students, who provided information on their use of the home environment, their perception of family social climate through the Family Environment Scale (FES), and their sense of well-being through the General Well-Being Questionnaire (GWBQ). Multiple regression analyses revealed several strong relationships between the variables. First, and most important, a strong positive relationship between adolescents' sense of well-being and time spent with adults in leisure and recreational activities in the home was identified. Second, selected home setting “behaviors,” including watching television, were found to account for approximately 40% of the variance in adolescents' scores on the “Intellectual-Cultural Orientation” subscale of the FES. Implications were drawn for research on the relationship between perception of social climate, optimal human functioning, and actual behavior in specified settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell, P. A., Fischer, J. D., and Loomis, R. J. (1978).Environmental Psychology, Saunders, Philadelphia.
Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. (1975).Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.
Draper, N. R., and Smith, H. (1966).Applied Regression Analysis, Wiley, New York.
Dupuy, H. (1973). Developmental rationale, substantive, derivative, and conceptual relevance of the General Well-Being Scale. Working paper, National Center for Health Statistics, Washington, D.C.
Hogge, J. H., Banspach, S. W., Hamning, R. R., and Moore, J. W. (1979). Matrix manipulation system. Unpublished computer program, George Peabody College Computer Center, Nashville, Tenn.
Insel, P., and Moos, R. H. (1974). Psychological environments: Expanding the scope of human ecology.Am. Psychologist 29: 179–188.
Lieben, R. M., Neale, J. M., and Davidson, E. S. (1973).The Early Window: Effects of Television on Children and Youth, Pergamon, New York.
Maccoby, E. E. (1951). Television: Its impact on school children.Public Opin. Quart. 15: 421–444.
McMillan, D. W. (1974).An ecological approach to quality of life. Unpublished master's thesis, George Peabody College.
Moos, R. H. (1974).Family Environment Scale: Preliminary Manual, California Social Ecology Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Moos, R. H. (1976).The Human Context, Wiley, New York.
Moos, R. H. (1979).Evaluating Educational Environments, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Murray, H. (1938).Explorations in Personality, Oxford University Press, New York.
Newbrough, J. R., Wandersman, A., McMillan, D., and Adelberg, B. M. (1975).Alienation and Environmental Integration of Adolescents, Research grant MH28360-02 from National Institute of Mental Health to Center for Community Studies, George Peabody College, Nashville, Tenn.
Nunnally, J. M. (1967).Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Pace, C. R., and Stern, G. G. (1958). An approach to the measurement of psychological characteristics of college environments.J. Educ. Psychol. 49: 269–277.
Parke, R. D. (1978). Children's home environments. In Altman, I., and Wohlwill, J. F. (eds.),Children and Environment, Vol. III, Plenum, New York.
Sacks, J. E., and McMillan, D. W. (1981). Age segregation and adolescent alienation. Unpublished manuscript, George Peabody College, Nashville, Tenn.
Simpkins, C., and Burke, F. E. (1974a).Comparative analysis of NCHS General Well-Being Schedule: Response Distortions, Community vs. Patient Discrimination and Content Relations, Report 1, Center for Community Studies, George Peabody College, Nashville, Tenn.
Simpkins, C., and Burke, F. E. (1974b)Maximum Patient-Community Status Discrimination and Analysis of Dimensions of Various Assessment Methods, Center for Community Studies, George Peabody College, Nashville, Tenn.
Stein, A. H., and Freidrich, L. K. (1975). Impact of television on children and youth. In Hetherington, E. M. (ed.),Review of Child Development Research, Vol. V, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Stern, G. G., Stein, M. I., and Bloom, B. S. (1956).Methods in Personality Assessment, Free Press, Glencoe, Ill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is based on a doctoral dissertation submitted by the second author to the Department of Psychology, George Peabody College for Teachers of Vanderbilt University. The data for the study were collected as part of a larger investigation of alienation and integration of adolescents in community settings, which was funded by a grant to the Center for Community Studies, George Peabody College for Teachers of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, by the National Institute of Mental Health.
Received his Ph.D. in psychology from George Peabody College for Teachers. Major interests are problems of adolescents, particularly age segregation and alienation in community settings.
Received his Ph.D. in psychology from George Peabody College for Teachers. Major interests are ecological relationships and issues in school and home settings.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McMillan, D.W., Hiltonsmith, R.W. Adolescents at home: An exploratory study of the relationship between perception of family social climate, general well-being, and actual behavior in the home setting. J Youth Adolescence 11, 301–315 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537172
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537172