Abstract
Five modes of reacting to the intimacy-isolation crisis of young adulthood were described, measured, and validated. Criteria for inclusion in one of the five intimacy statuses were (1) presence or absence of peer friendships, (2) presence or absence of an enduring-committed-heterosexual relationship, and (3) “depth” vs. “superficiality” of peer relationships. Statuses were compared on a “partner-perception” task assessing subject's intimate knowledge of his partner (a close male or female friend who accompanied the subject to the experiment). In all, 66 male college students participated in the study, 50 with male partners and 16 with female partners. The results support the hypothesis that subjects high in intimacy status share a greater degree of mutual knowledge and understanding with their partners then medium-or low-level intimacy status subjects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chittick, E. V., and Himmelstein, P. (1967). The manipulation of self-disclosure.J. Psychol. 65: 117–121.
Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on “understanding of others” and “assumed similarity.”Psychol. Bull. 52: 177–193.
Dymond, R. (1954). Interpersonal perception and marital happiness.Can. J. Psychol. 8: 164–171.
Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle,Psychological Issues, No. 1, International Universities Press, New York.
Erikson, E. H. (1963).Childhood and Society, 2nd ed., Norton, New York.
Fromm, E. (1956).The Art of Loving, Harper and Row, New York.
Hollingshead, A. B., and Redlich, F. C. (1958).Social Class and Mental Illness, Wiley, New York.
Jourard, S. M. (1959). Self-disclosure and other cathexis.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 59: 428–431.
Jourard, S. M., and Jaffe, P. E. (1970). Influence of an interviewer's disclosure on the self disclosing behavior of interviewees.J. Couns. Psychol. 17: 252–257.
Jourard, S. M., and Resnick, J. C. (1970). Some effects of self-disclosure on college women.J. Humanistic Psychol. 10: 84–93.
Marcia, J. E. (1964). Determination and construct validation of ego identity status. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego identity status.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 3:551–558.
Masling, J., Johnson, C., and Saturansky, C. (1975). Oral imagery, accuracy of perceiving others, and performance in Peace Corps training.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 30: 414–419.
Orlofsky, J. L. (1974). Intimacy status, partner perception, and resolution of previous developmental crises. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
Orlofsky, J. L., Marcia, J. E., and Lesser, I. M. (1973). Ego identity status and the intimacy vs. isolation crisis of young adulthood.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 27 (2): 211–219.
Yufit, R. (1956). Intimacy and isolation: Some behavioral and psychodynamic correlates. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago (University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Mich., BF 698, 9, S6Y8).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research was supported by SUNY/Buffalo Institutional Funds Grant No. 050-A081A.
This article is based in part on a doctoral dissertation submitted to the State University of New York at Buffalo (Orlofsky, 1974).
Received Ph.D. in clinical psychology at the State University of New York at Buffalo in 1974. Primary research interest is in personality development during late adolescence and young adulthood, particularly identity formation and the development of an intimate mode of interpersonal relationships. Also involved in research on sex roles and psychological androgyny.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Orlofsky, J.L. Intimacy status: Relationship to interpersonal perception. J Youth Adolescence 5, 73–88 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537085
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537085