Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 551–576 | Cite as

Adolescent room culture: Studying media in the context of everyday life

  • Jeanne R. Steele
  • Jane D. Brown
Article

Abstract

For the past several years, the authors have been investigating adolescent room culture in order to learn more about the relationship between teens and the media. The bedroom, they have found, is an important haven for most teenagers, a private, personal space often decorated to reflect teens' emerging sense of themselves and where they fit in the larger culture. Teens listen to music, read magazines, watch television, do homework, and consider the events of the day in their rooms. They appropriate and transform media messages and images to help them make sense of their lives. By looking closely at how teens draw from the media as they construct their identities and personal worlds, the authors have come to see adolescent media use as a dialectical process played out through everyday practices. Their Adolescents' Media Practice Model highlights the connections between adolescents' identities and media selection, interaction, and application.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In Bryant, J., and Zillmann, D. (eds.).Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  2. Bentley, G. C. (1987). Ethnicity and practice.Compar. Stud. Society History 29: 24–55.Google Scholar
  3. Biocca, F. (1988). Opposing conceptions of the audience: The active and passive hemispheres of mass communication theory. In Anderson, J. A. (ed.),Commun. Yearbook 11. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1977).Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1990).The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, J. D., White, A. B., and Nikopoulou, L. (1993). Disinterest, intrigue and resistance: Early adolescent girls' use of sexual media content. In Greenberg, B., Brown, J. D., and Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. (eds.),Media, Sex and the Adolescent. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, L. M., and Gilligan, C. (1992).Meeting at the crossroads: Women's Psychology and Girls' Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  8. Connell, R. W. (1983).Which Way Is Up? Essays on Sex, Class and Culture, Allen and Unwin, Winchester, MA.Google Scholar
  9. Corsaro, W. A. (1992). Interpretive reproduction in children's peer cultures.Social Psychol. Quart. 55: 160–177.Google Scholar
  10. Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Larson, R. (1984).Being Adolescent: Conflict and Growth in the Teenage Years. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Dervin, B. (1980). Communication gaps and inequities: Moving toward a reconceptualization. In Dervin, B., and Voigt, M. J. (eds.),Progress in Communication Sciences (Vol. 2), Ablex, Norwood, NJ.Google Scholar
  12. Donohew, L., and Tipton, L. (1973). A conceptual model of information seeking, avoiding and processing. In Clarke, P., (ed.)New Models for Communication Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA. Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Gamson, W. A. and Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach.Am. J. Sociol. 95: 1–37.Google Scholar
  14. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., and Signorielli, N. (1994). In Bryant, J., and Zillmann, D., (eds.).Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  15. Gitlin, T. (1991). The politics of communication and the communication of politics. In Curran, J., and Gurevitch, M., (eds.),Mass Media and Society. Edward Arnold, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Gore, T. (1987).Raising PG Kids in an X-Rated Society. Abingdon Press, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  17. Graber, D. A. (1989). Content and meaning: What's it all about?Am. Behav. Scient. 33: 144–152.Google Scholar
  18. Hall, S. (1986). On postmodernism and articulation: An interview with Stuart Hall.J. Commun. Inquiry 10: 45–60.Google Scholar
  19. Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In Rutherford J. (ed.).Identity, Community, Culture, Difference. Lawrence and Wishart, London.Google Scholar
  20. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective.Signs 14: 575–599.Google Scholar
  21. Hartsock, N. (1983). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for specifically feminist historical materialism. In Harding, S., and Hintikka, M. B. (eds.),Discovering Reality. Reidel, Boston.Google Scholar
  22. Heath, S. B. (1982). What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school.Lang. Society 11: 49–76.Google Scholar
  23. Heisley, D. D., and Levy, S. J. (1991). Autodriving: A photoelicitation technique.J. Consum. Res. 18: 257–272.Google Scholar
  24. Holland, D., and Eisenhart, M. (1990).Educated in Romance: Women, Achievement, and College Culture. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  25. Holland, D., and Valsiner, J. (1988). Cognition, symbols, and Vygotsky's developmental psychology.Ethos 16: 247–272.Google Scholar
  26. Illouz, E. (1992). Reason within passion: Love in women's magazines.Crit. Stud. Mass Commun. 8: 231–248.Google Scholar
  27. Iyengar, S. (1991).Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  28. Jo, E., and Berkowitz, L. (1994). A priming effect analysis of media influences: An update. In Bryant, J., and Zillmann, D. (eds.).Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, R. (1987). What is cultural studies anyway?Social Text: Theory/Culture/Ideology 16: 38–880.Google Scholar
  30. Kosicki, G. M., and McLeod, J. M. (1990). Learning from political news: Effects of media images and information-processing strategies. In Kraus, S. (ed.),Mass Communication and Information Processing. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  31. Lave, J., Duguid, P. Fernandez, N. and Axel, E. (1992). Coming of age in Birmingham: Cultural studies and conceptions of subjectivity.Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 21: 257–282.Google Scholar
  32. Levy, M., and Windahl, S. (1985). The concept of audience activity. In Rosengren, K. E., P. Palmgreen, and Wenner, L. (eds.),Media Gratification Research: Current Perspectives. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  33. Lindlof, T. R., and Grodin, D. (1990). When media use can't be observed: Some problems and tactics of collaborative audience research.J. Commun. 40: 8–28.Google Scholar
  34. Markus, H., and Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves.Am. Psychol. 41: 954–969.Google Scholar
  35. Mason, J. (ed.) (1983).The Family of Woman, Putnam Publishing Group, New York.Google Scholar
  36. McQuail, D., and Windahl, S. (1993).Communication Models for the Study of Mass Communication. Longman, London.Google Scholar
  37. McRobbie, A. (1984). Dance and social fantasy. In McRobbie, A., and Nava, M. (eds.).Gender and Generation. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  38. McRobbie, A. (1982). “Jackie”: An ideology of adolescent femininity. In Waites, B., Bennett, T., and Martin, G., (eds.),Popular Culture: Past and Present. Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  39. McRobbie, A., and Garber, J. (1975). Girls and subcultures. In Hall, S., and Jefferson, T., (eds.),Resistance Through Rituals: Youth Subcultures in Post-War Britain. Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
  40. Moffatt, M. (1989).Coming of Age in New Jersey: College and American Culture. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  41. Moffitt, M. A. (1993). Articulating meaning: Reconceptions of the meaning process, fantasy/reality, and identity in leisure activities.Commun. Theory, 3: 231–251.Google Scholar
  42. Radway, J. A. (1984).Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  43. Riger, S. (1992). Epistemological debates, feminist voices.Am. Psychol. 47: 730–740.Google Scholar
  44. Rogoff, B. (1990).Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Rook, D. W. (1991). I was observed (in absentia) and autodriven by the consumer behavior odyssey. In Belk, R. W. (ed.),Highways and Buyways: Naturalistic Research from the Consumer Behavior Odyssey. Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT.Google Scholar
  46. Rosengren, K. E., and Windahl, S. (1989).Media Matter: TV Use in Childhood and Adolescence. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.Google Scholar
  47. Rubin, A. M. (1994). Media uses and effects: A uses-and-gratifications perspective. In Bryant, J., and Zillmann, D. (eds.)Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  48. Salinger, A. (1995).In my room: Teenagers in their bedrooms. Chronicle Books, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  49. Schwichtenberg, C. (1989). The “mother lode” of feminist research: Congruent paradigms in the analysis of beauty culture. In Dervin, B., Grossberg, L., O'Keefe, B. J., and Wartella, E. (eds.),Rethinking Communication, Vol. 2, Paradigm Exemplars. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, D. (1987).The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Northeastern University Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  51. Smitherman, G. (1994).Black Talk: Words and Phrases from the Hood to the Amen Corner. Houghton Mifflin, New York.Google Scholar
  52. Snow, D. A., and Anderson, L. (1987). Identity work among the homeless: The verbal construction and avowal of personal identities.Am. J. Sociol. 92: 1336–1371.Google Scholar
  53. Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies.Am. Sociol. Rev. 51: 273–286.Google Scholar
  54. Thorson, E. (1989). Processing television commercials. In Dervin, B., Grossberg, L., O'Keefe, B. J., and Wartella, E. (eds.),Rethinking Communication: Vol. 2—Paradigm Examplars. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  55. Valsiner, J. (1991). Building theoretical bridges over a lagoon of everyday events: A review ofApprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context by Barbara Rogoff.Human Develop. 34: 307–315.Google Scholar
  56. Valsiner, J. (1993). Bi-directional cultural transmission and constructive sociogenesis. In Maier, R., and de Graaf, W. (eds.),Mechanisms of Sociogenesis, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  57. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman (Eds.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  58. Wallendorf, M., and Arnould, E. J. (1988). “My favorite things”: A cross-cultural inquiry into object attachment, possessiveness, and social linkage.J. Consum. Res. 14: 531–547.Google Scholar
  59. Wertsch, J. V. (1991).Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  60. Willis, P. (1977).Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  61. Willis, P. (1990).Common Culture. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  62. Wolf, N. (1991).The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women. W. Morrow, New York.Google Scholar
  63. Zinn, L. (1994, April 11). Teens here comes the biggest wave yet.Business Week, p. 76 and following.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeanne R. Steele
    • 1
  • Jane D. Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Journalism and Mass CommunicationUniversity of North CarolinaChapel Hill

Personalised recommendations