Skip to main content
Log in

Fitting the negative binomial distribution to some data on asynaptic behaviour of chromosomes

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Anscombe, F. J., 1948. The transformation of Poisson, Binomial and Negative Bionmial data. Biometrika 35: 246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe, F. J., 1949. The statistical analysis of insect counts based on the negative binomial distribution. Biometrics 5: 165–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe, F. J., 1950. Sampling theory of the negative binomial and logarithmic series distributions. Biometrika 37: 358–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arbous, A. G. andJ. E. Kerrich, 1951. Accident statistics and the concept of accident proneness. Biometrics 7: 340–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, E. E. A., 1948. Plant populations. I A new application of Neyman's contagious distribution. Ann. Bot. 12: 221–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beall, G., 1940. The fit and significance of contagious distributions when applied to observations on larval insects. Ecology 21: 460–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beall, G., 1942. The transformation of data from entomological field experiments so that the analysis of variance becomes applicable. Biometrika 32: 243–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beall, G. andR. R. Rescia 1953. A generalization of Neyman's contagious distributions. Biometrics 9: 354–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beall, 1954. Data in binomial or near-binomial distribution. In Statistics and mathematics in biology, ed. by O. Kempthrone, Iowa State College. Chap. 22, p. 295.

  • Bliss, C. I. andR. A. Fisher, 1953. Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data. Biometrics 9: 173–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, C. I. andA. R. G. Owen, 1958. Negative binomial distributions with a common k. Biometrika 45: 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, W., 1958. Simplified methods of fitting the truncated negative binomial distribution. Biometrika 45: 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. A., 1953. Experimental evidence concerning contagious distributions in ecology. Biometrika 40: 186–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller, W., 1943. On a general class of “contagious” distributions. Ann. Math. Stat. 14: 389–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A., 1941. The negative binomial distribution. Ann. Eugenics II: 182–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. andG. U. Yule, 1920. An inquiry into the nature of frequency distributions representative of multiple happenings, with particular reference to the occurrence of multiple attacks of disease or of repeated accidents. Jour. Roy. Stat. Soc. 83: 255–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J. B. S., 1941. The fitting of binomial distributions. Ann. Eugenics II: 179–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, W. D. andH. N. Barber, 1958. Patterns of chromosome breakage after irradiation and ageing. Heredity 12: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. W., 1937. Practical field methods of sampling soil for wireworms. Jour., Agric. Res. 54: 123–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleczkowski, A., 1949. The transformation of local lesion counts for statistical analysis. Ann. App. Biol. 36: 139–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maritz, J. S., 1950. On the validity of inferences drawn from the fitting of Poisson and negative binomial distributions to observed accident data. Psychol. Bull. 47: 434–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, J., 1939. On a class of “contagious” distributions, applicable in entomology and bacteriology. Ann. Math. Stat. 10: 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. S., 1954. Germination and survival of eastern hemlock seedlings in Connecticut seedbeds. Abst. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 35: 60. (cited after Bliss and Owen, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quenouille, M. H., 1949. A relation between the logarithmic, Poisson and negative binomial series. Biometrics 5: 162–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampford, M. R., 1955. The truncated negative binomial distribution. Biometrika 42: 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenton, L. R., 1950. Maximum likelihood and the efficiency of the method of moments. Biometrika 37: III-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sichel, H. J., 1951. The estimation of the parameters of a negative binomial distribution with special reference to psychological data. Psychometrika 16: 107–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skellam, J. G., 1948. A probability distribution derived from the binomial distribution by regarding the probability of success a variable between the sets of trials. Jour. Roy. Stat. Soc. B: 10: 257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirret, G. M., G. Beall andM. Timonin, 1937. A field experiment on the control of the European cornborer,Pyrausta nubilalis Hubn. byBeauveria bassiana Vuill. Scient. Agric. 17: 857–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Student 1907. On the error of counting with a haemocytometer. Biometrika 5: 351–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, I., 1914. On the Poisson law of small numbers. Biometrika 10: 36–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, M. E., 1946. The use of the negative binomial distribution in an industrial problem. Suppl. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 8: 202–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jain, S.K. Fitting the negative binomial distribution to some data on asynaptic behaviour of chromosomes. Genetica 30, 108–122 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01535667

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01535667

Keywords

Navigation