Skip to main content
Log in

A reversible selection system for UMP synthase gene amplification and deamplification

  • Published:
Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics

Abstract

The bifunctional enzyme UMP synthase provides a unique reversible selection system whereby cells that have amplified the UMP synthase gene can be isolated from a wild-type population and cells that have deleted the extra genes can be selected from a population with amplified copies of the gene. UMP synthase catalyzes the conversion of orotic acid to orotidine 5′-monophosphate (OMP) and then OMP to UMP. In the amplification step, Chinese hamster lung cells are selected for resistance to pyrazofurin and 6-azauridine, two inhibitors of the orotidine 5′-decarboxylase activity that converts OMP to UMP. The resistant cells have increased levels of both activities of UMP synthase as a result of a stable amplification of the UMP synthase gene. The deamplification step depends on 5-fluorouracil (5FU), which is converted to its monophosphate form by the orotate phosphoribosyltransferase activity of UMP synthase. Thus cells with increases in this activity are more sensitive to 5FU cytotoxicity, permitting single-step selection of revertants that have lost their amplified UMP synthase genes. These 5FU-selected cells are similar to the parental cell line in their level of UMP synthase activity and number of UMP synthase gene copies. Reselection in increasing concentrations of pyrazofurin and 6-azauridine allows one to isolate cells that have reamplified the UMP synthase gene. The ability to cycle cells of a single lineage through states of amplification and deamplification will facilitate study of the gene amplification process and the factors that influence the composition and stability of amplified regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Cowell, J.K. (1982).Annu. Rev. Genet. 16:21–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stark, G.R., and Wahl, G.M. (1984).Annu. Rev. Biochem. 53:447–491.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaufman, R.J., Brown, P.C., and Schimke, R.T. (1979).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76:5669–5673.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Curt, G.A., Carney, D.N., Cowan, K.H., Jolivet, J., Bailey, B.D., Drake, J.C., Kao-Shan, C.S., Minna, J.D., and Chabner, B.A. (1983).N. Engl. J. Med. 208:199–202.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kanalas, J.J., Hutton, J.J., and Suttle, D.P. (1985).Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 11:359–369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Biedler, J.L., and Spengler, B.A. (1976).Science 191:185–187.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nunberg, J.N., Kaufman, R.J., Schimke, R.T., Urlaub, G., and Chasin, L.A. (1978).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75:5553–5556.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Biedler, J.L., Melera, P.W., and Spengler, B.A. (1980).Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 2:47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wahl, G.M., Vitto, L., Padgett, R.A., and Stark, G.R. (1982).Mol. Cell. Biol. 2:308–319.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alitalo, K., Schwab, M., Lin, C.C., Varmus, H.E., and Bishop, J.M. (1983).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80:1707–1711.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mines, L.S., Yang, C.-H., Spengler, B.A., Biedler, J.L., and Sirotnak, F.M. (1988).Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 29: 1149.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnston, R.N., Beverley, S.M., and Schimke, R.T. (1983).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80:3711–3715.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Suttle, D.P., and Stark, G.R. (1979).J. Biol. Chem. 254:4602–4607.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Levinson, B.B., Ullman, B., and Martin, D.W., Jr. (1979).J. Biol. Chem. 254:4396–4401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Suttle, D.P., Bugg, B.Y., Winkler, J.K., and Kanalas, J.J. (1988).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85:1754–1758.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dix, D.E., Lehman, C.P., Jakubowski, A., Moyer, J.D., and Handschumacher, R.E. (1979).Cancer Res. 39:4485–4490.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gutowski, E., Sweeney, M.J., Delong, D.C., Hamill, R.L., and Gerzon, K. (1975).Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 255:544–551.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pasternak, C.A., and Handschumacher, R.E. (1959).J. Biol. Chem. 234:2992–2997.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanalas, J.J., and Suttle, D.P. (1984).J. Biol. Chem. 259:1848–1853.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ardalan, B., and Glazer, R. (1981).Cancer Treat. Rev. 8:157–167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Reyes, P., and Guganig, M.E. (1975).J. Biol. Chem. 250:5097–5108.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Patterson, D. (1980).Somat. Cell Genet. 6:101–114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gillin, F.D., Roufa, D.J., Beaudet, A.L., and Caskey, C.T. (1972).Genetics 72:239–252.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones, M.E., Kavipurapu, P.R., and Traut, T.W. (1978).Methods Enzymol. 51:155–167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Prabhakararao, K., and Jones, M.E. (1975).Anal. Biochem. 69:451–467.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Meinkoth, J., and Wahl, G.M. (1984).Anal. Biochem. 138:267–284.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Urlaub, G., Landzberg, M., and Chasin, L.A. (1981).Cancer Res. 41:1594–1601.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kempe, T.D., Swyryd, E.A., Bruist, M., and Stark, G.R. (1976).Cell 9:541–550.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rowland, P., III, Chiang, J., Jargiello-Jarrett, P., and Hoffee, P.A. (1986).Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 41:136–144.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brown, P.C., Tlsty, T.D., and Schimke, R.T. (1983).Mol. Cell. Biol. 3:1097–1107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tlsty, T.D., Brown, P.C., and Schimke, R.T. (1984).Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:1050–1056.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rice, G.C., Hoy, C., and Schimke, R.T. (1986).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83:5978–5982.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bresler, S., Mosevitsky, M., and Vyacheslavov, L. (1970).Nature 225:764–766.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kunz, B.A., Barclay, B.J., Game, J.C., Little, J.G., and Haynes, R.H. (1980).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77:6057–6061.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Barclay, B.J., Kunz, B.A., Little, J.G., and Haynes, R.H. (1982).Can. J. Biochem. 60:172–184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suttle, D.P. A reversible selection system for UMP synthase gene amplification and deamplification. Somat Cell Mol Genet 15, 435–443 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01534894

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01534894

Keywords

Navigation