Skip to main content
Log in

Perspectives on UV light mutagenesis: Investigation of the CHOaprt gene carried on a retroviral shuttle vector

  • Published:
Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics

Abstract

The extent to which the cellular processing of shuttle vector-carried genes reflects that of endogenous chromosomal loci has been a subject of considerable controversy. In order to address this issue, we have developed a retroviral-based shuttle vector carrying the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (aprt) gene stably integrated into the genome to be used for studying mutational specificity in mammalian cells. Initially, we have characterized a collection of UV-induced mutants in a CHO cell background. We have therefore been able to directly compare this shuttle vector data to that previously obtained for UV-induced mutation at the endogenous CHO (aprt)locus. Although some potential differences between the two spectra have been noted, there appears to be a remarkable similarity in the distribution and site specificity of UV-induced mutations. These similarities extend to extrachromosomal shuttle vectors as well and consolidate the role of shuttle vectors as powerful analytical tools for studying mechanisms of point mutagenesis in mammalian cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Glickman, B.W., de Jong, P.J., de Boer, J.G., Drobetsky, E.A., and Grosovsky, A.J. (1989).Mutat. Res.,226:245–252.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Myers, R.M., Larin, Z., and Maniatis, T. (1985).Science 230:1242–1246.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer, S.G., and Lerraan, L.S. (1983).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80:1579–1583.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Urlaub, G., Carothers, A.M., and Chasin, L.A. (1985).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82:1189–1193.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hauser, J., Seidman, M.M., Sidur, K., and Dixon, K. (1986).Mol. Cell Biol. 6:277–285.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsia Chao, H., Lebkowski, J.S., Leong, P., Calos, M.P., and Miller, J.H. (1989).J. Mol. Biol. 205:103–113.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Drinkwater, N.R., and Kleindinst, D.K. (1986).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83:3402–3406.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ashman, C.R., Jagadeeswaran, P., and Davidson, R.L. (1986).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83:3356–3360.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Glazer, P.M., Sarkar, S.N., and Summers, W.C. (1986).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83:1041–1044.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Drobetsky, E.A., Grosovsky, A.J., and Glickman, B.W. (1987).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84:9103–9107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grosovsky, A.J., deBoer, J.G., deJong, P.J., Drobetsky, E.A., and Glickman, B.W. (1988).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85:185–188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mazur, M.M., and Glickman, B.W. (1988).Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 14:393–400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Boer, J., and Glickman, B.W. (1988).Carcinogenesis (in press).

  14. De Jong, P., Grosovsky, A.J., and Glickman, B.W. (1988).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85:3499–3505.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grosovsky, A.J., Drobetsky, E.A., deJong, P.J., and Glickman, B.W. (1986).Genetics 113:405–410.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cepko, C.L., Roberts, B.E., and Mulligan, R.C. (1984).Cell 37:1053–1062.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mann, R., Mulligan, R.C., and Baltimore, D. (1983).Cell 37:153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gluzman, Y. (1981).Cell 23:175–182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hirt, B. (1967).J. Mol. Biol. 26:365–369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Levinson, A., Silver, D., and Seed, B. (1984).J. Mol. Appl. Genet. 2:507–517.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulson, A.R. (1977).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74:5463–5467.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Scharf, S.J., Horn, G.T., and Erlich, H.A. (1986).Science 233:1076–1078.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Protic-Sabljic, M., N., Tuteja, N. Tuteja, Munson, P.J., Hauser, J., Kraemer, K.H., Dixon, K. (1986).Mol. Cell Biol. 6:3349–3356.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Seidman, M.M., Bredberg, A., Seetharam, S., and Kraemer, K.H. (1987).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84:4944–4948.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brash, D.E., Seetharam, S., Kraemer, K.H., Seidman, M.M., and Bredberg, A. (1987).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84:3782–3786.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Glickman, B.W., Schaaper, R.M., Haseltine, W.A., Dunn, R.L., and Brash, D.E. (1986).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83:6945–6950.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schaaper, R.M., Dunn, R.L., and Glickman, B.W. (1987).J. Mol. Biol. 198:187–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Franklin, W.A., Doetsch, P.W., and Haseltine, W.A. (1985).Nucleic Acids Res. 13:5317–5325.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brash, D.E., and Haseltine, W.A. (1982).Nature 298:189–192.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bohr, V.A., Smith, C.A., Okumoto, D.S., and Hanawalt, P.C. (1985).Cell 40:359–369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drobetsky, E.A., Grosovsky, A.J., Skandalis, A. et al. Perspectives on UV light mutagenesis: Investigation of the CHOaprt gene carried on a retroviral shuttle vector. Somat Cell Mol Genet 15, 401–409 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01534891

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01534891

Keywords

Navigation