Skip to main content
Log in

Cell fusion-mediated improvement in transfection competence for repair-deficient mutant of mouse T cell line

  • Published:
Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics

Abstract

A multiple mutagen-sensitive mutant (XUM1) of mouse T-cell lymphoma line, L5178Y, is hypersensitive to ionizing radiation, ultraviolet (UV) light, and cross-linking agents (such as mitomycin C). The frequency of transfection for XUML cells after exposure to calcium phosphate-coprecipitated pSV2neo DNA was more than 104-fold less effective than that for Ltkaprt (LTA) cells. Other transfection methods (DEAE-dextran and polybrene-DMSO) were not effective for L5178Y and XUM1 cells. The transfection-proficient trait of LTA cells was demonstrated to be genetically dominant by examining the transfection frequency in hybrid clones constructed between XUM1 and LTA cells. To circumvent the problem with XUM1, the LTA genes necessary for transformation processes were introduced into XUM1 cells by constructing hybrids between XUM1 and LTA cells irradiated with X-rays which causes directional chromosome elimination for hybrid cells. Four of 194 hybrid clones tested were transfection-proficient and hypersensitive to UV (XL102, XL107, XL215, and XL216). All four clones were not hypersensitive to X-rays or mitomycin C. The frequencies of transfection for XL102 and XL216 were nearly the same level as that for LTA cells. The efficiency of transfection for XL107 and XL215 was 10 to 100-fold lower than that for LTA cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Graham, F.L., and Van der Eb, A.J. (1973).Virology 52:456–467.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wiegler, M., Silverstein, S., Lee, L.S., Pellicer, A., Cheng, Y., and Axel, R. (1977).Cell 11:223–232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Westerveld, A., Hoeijmakers, J.H.J., Van Duin, M., J. de Wit, Odijk, H., Pastink, A., Wood, R.D., and Bootsma, D. (1984).Nature 310:425–429.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shiomi, T., Hieda-Shiomi, N., Hama-Inaba, H., Ito, A., and Sato, K. (1987).Mutat. Res. 182:223–227.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shiomi, T., Hieda-Shiomi, N., and Sato, K. (1982).Somat. Cell Genet. 8:329–345.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sato, K., And Setlow, R.B. (1981).Mutat. Res. 84:443–445.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hori, T., Shiomi, T., and Sato, K. (1983).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80:5655–5659.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sompayrac, L.M., and Danna, K.J. (1981).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78: 7575–7578.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chaney, W.G., Howard, D.R., Pollard, J.W., Sallustio, S., and Stanley, P. (1986).Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 12:237–244.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawai, S., and Nishizawa, M. (1984).Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:1172–1174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pontecorvo, G. (1971).Nature 230:367–369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chapman, V.M., and Shows, T.B. (1976).Nature 259:665–667.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shiomi, T., Hieda-Shiomi, N., and Sato, K. (1983).Mutat. Res. 108:395–404.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shiomi, T., Hieda-Shiomi, N., and Sato, K. (1982).Mutat. Res. 103:61–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Southern, P.J., and Berg, P. (1982).Mol. Appl. Genet. 1:327–341.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E.F., and Sambrook, J. (1982).Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hama-Inaba, H., Hieda-Shiomi, N., Shiomi, T., and Sato, K. (1983).Mutat. Res. 108:405–416.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sato, K., and Hieda, N. (1979).Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 35:83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsuji, H., Shiomi, T., and Tobari, I. (1984). InSister Chromatid Exchange: 25 Years of Experimental Research, (eds.) Tice, R.R., and Hollaender, A. (Plenum Press, New York), pp. 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Van Duin, M., J. de Wit, Odijk, H., Westerveld, A., Yasui, A., Koken, M.H.M., Hoeijmakers, J.H.J., and Bootsma, D. (1986).Cell 44:913–923.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jolly, D.J., Esty, A.C., Bernard, H.U., and Friedmann, T. (1982).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79:5038–5041.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kai, R., Ohtsubo, M., Sekiguchi, M., and Nishimoto, T. (1986).Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:2027–2032.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuhn, L.C., MacClelland, A., and Ruddle, F.H., (1984).Cell 37:95–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lowy, I., Pellicer, A., Jackson, J.F., Sim, G.K., Silverstein, S., and Axel, R. (1980)Cell 22:817–823.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Perucho, M., Hanahan, D., Lipsich L., and Wigler, M. (1980).Nature 285:207–210.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Takeishi, K., Ayusawa, D., Kaneda, S., Shimizu, K., and Seno, T. (1984).J. Biochem. 95:1477–1483.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Oi, V.T., Morrieon, S.L., Herzenberg, L.A., and Berg, P. (1983).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80:825–829.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Corsaro, C.M., and Pearson, M.L. (1981).Somat. Cell Genet. 7:617–630.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shiomi, T., Hieda-Shiomi, N., Sato, K. et al. Cell fusion-mediated improvement in transfection competence for repair-deficient mutant of mouse T cell line. Somat Cell Mol Genet 14, 195–203 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01534404

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01534404

Keywords

Navigation